Dataset Information

Six-Month Follow-Up after Vaccination with BNT162b2: SARS-CoV-2 Antigen-Specific Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses in Hemodialysis Patients and Kidney Transplant Recipients.

ABSTRACT: Hemodialysis patients (HDP) and kidney transplant recipients (KTR) have a high risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 with poor clinical outcomes. Because of this, vaccination of these groups of patients against SARS-CoV-2 is particularly important. However, immune responses may be impaired in immunosuppressed and chronically ill patients. Here, our aim was to compare the efficacy of an mRNA-based vaccine in HDP, KTR, and healthy subjects.

Design

In this prospective observational cohort study, the humoral and cellular response of prevalent 192 HDP, 50 KTR, and 28 healthy controls (HC) was assessed 1, 2, and 6 months after the first immunization with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine.

Results

After 6 months, 97.5% of HDP, 37.9% of KTR, and 100% of HC had an antibody response. Median antibody levels were 1539.7 (±3355.8), 178.5 (±369.5), and 2657.8 (±2965.8) AU/mL in HDP, KTR, and HC, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). A SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific cell response to vaccination was found in 68.8% of HDP, 64.5% of KTR, and 90% of HC.

Conclusion

The humoral response rates to mRNA-based vaccination of HDPs are comparable to HCs, but antibody titers are lower. Furthermore, HDPs have weaker T-cell response to vaccination than HCs. KTRs have very low humoral and antigen-specific cellular response rates and antibody titers, which requires other vaccination strategies in addition to booster vaccination.

SUBMITTER: Boedecker-Lips SC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8780885 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS Mortality due to SARS-COV-2 infection in hemodialysis (HD) patients and kidney transplant recipients(KTRs) is high. Despite increased rates of administration of two doses of mRNA vaccines among these vulnerable populations, the adequacy of the respective generated immune responses is reported lower than general population, especially in KTRs. A third booster dose has been officially recommended in these immunocompromised patients while the humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS-COV-2 vaccination remains to be elucidated in HD patients and KTRs. The aim of our study was to investigate the antibody (Ab) response status together with vaccine-induced alterations in circulating lymphocytes subsets, following the administration of three doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine in a cohort of maintenance HD patients and KTRs. METHOD The initial cohort of this prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04932876) included 34 HD patients and 54 KTRs who received two doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech). Of this cohort, 24 HD patients and 30 KTRs, who remained free of SARS-CoV2 infection and receive a third dose 6 months after the second dose, were finally analyzed. Lymphocyte subpopulations, including B cells, CD4+and CD8+T cells as well as naïve and memory T lymphocytes subpopulations among others, were analyzed by flow cytometry at four time points, before vaccination (T0), before the second dose (T1), 2 weeks after the second dose (T2) and 2–3 weeks after the third dose (T3). The anti-SARS-CoV2 antibody (Ab) response was assessed by using the ARCHITECT IgG II Quant test (Abbott). Titers >50 arbitrary units (AU)/mL were considered positive for seroconversion at T1 and at T2 and T3. RESULTS Of the initial cohort 31 HD patients (91.8%) and 16 KTRs (29.6%) became seropositive at T2. Of the final cohort (24 HD and 30 KTRs), almost all HD patients (23, 96%) became seropositive since T2 and this finding remained at T3 (Figure 1). In KTRs the percentage of responders was doubled between T2 and T3, T2 9 KTRs (30%) versus T3 18 KTRs (60%) (Figure 1). KTRs who developed Ab at T1 ``respond'' better to the third dose, maximizing the levels of Ab. HD patients who became seropositive at T1 displayed higher CD19+B lymphocytes compared with their seronegative HD counterparts. In HD patients, a positive correlation was established between CD19+B cells counts and Ab titers at all time-points (P < 0.001). In KTRs, Ab at T1 showed an inverse correlation with T+B+NK at T1 (P = 0.006). T2-Ab showed inverse correlation with CD45RA+CD45RO at T0 (P = 0.01) and with CD3+at T3 (P = 0.02). T3-Ab showed positive correlation with CD3+CD16+56+at T2 (P = 0.003) and with CD3-CD16+56+at T3 (P = 0.01). CD19+at T3 correlated positively with Ab at T1 and T3 (P = 0.003 and P = 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSION Our study confirms the improved immunogenicity after the third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine in KTRs. The positive correlation between CD19+B cells and Ab in both groups of patients, more stable and constant in HD patients in comparison with KTR, possibly reflects successful humoral immunity. However, a big proportion of kidney patients remain at high risk for COVID-19 infection considering the new more transmissible variants such as the Omicron variant.

Project description:Background and objectivesPatients receiving hemodialysis are at high risk for both severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and severe coronavirus disease 2019. A lifesaving vaccine is available, but sensitivity to vaccines is generally lower in patients on dialysis. Little is yet known about antibody responses after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in this vulnerable group.Design, setting, participants, and measurementsIn this prospective single-center study, we included 22 patients on dialysis and 46 healthy controls from Heidelberg University Hospital between December 2020 and February 2021. We measured anti-S1 IgG with a threshold index for detection greater than one, neutralizing antibodies with a threshold for viral neutralization of ≥30%, and antibodies against different SARS-CoV2 fragments 17-22 days after the first dose and 18-22 days after the second dose of the mRNA vaccine BNT162b2.ResultsAfter the first vaccine dose, four of 22 (18%) patients on dialysis compared with 43 of 46 (93%) healthy controls developed positive anti-S1 IgG, with a median anti-S1 IgG index of 0.2 (interquartile range, 0.1-0.7) compared with nine (interquartile range, 4-16), respectively. SARS-CoV2 neutralizing antibodies exceeded the threshold for neutralization in four of 22 (18%) patients on dialysis compared with 43 of 46 (93%) healthy controls, with a median percent inhibition of 11 (interquartile range, 3-24) compared with 65 (interquartile range, 49-75), respectively. After the second dose, 14 of 17 (82%) patients on dialysis developed neutralizing antibodies exceeding the threshold for viral neutralization and antibodies against the receptor binding S1 domain of the spike protein, compared with 46 of 46 (100%) healthy controls, respectively. The median percent inhibition was 51 (interquartile range, 32-86) compared with 98 (interquartile range, 97-98) in healthy controls.ConclusionsPatients receiving long-term hemodialysis show a reduced antibody response to the first and second doses of the mRNA vaccine BNT162b2. The majority (82%) develop neutralizing antibodies after the second dose but at lower levels than healthy controls.

Project description:BackgroundThe durability of the immune response following the 3-dose BNT162b2 vaccination is unknown. The complexity of the situation is enhanced by the threat that highly transmissible variants may further accelerate the decline in the protection afforded by mRNA vaccines.MethodsOne hundred and three 3-dose-vaccinated heart transplant recipients were longitudinally assessed for the kinetics of variant-specific neutralization (Cohort 1, n = 60) and SARS-CoV-2-specific-T-cell response (Cohort 2, n = 54) over 6 months. Neutralization and T-cell responses were compared between paired samples at 2 time points, using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple comparison test for continuous variables and McNemar's test for dichotomous variables. The Bonferroni method of p values adjustment for multiple comparison was applied.ResultsThe third dose induced high neutralization of the wild-type virus and delta variant (geometric mean titer [GMT], 137.2 [95% CI, 84.8-221.9] and 80.6, [95% CI, 49.3-132.0], respectively), and to a lesser degree of the omicron variant (GMT, 10.3 [95% CI, 5.9-17.9]). At 6 months, serum neutralizing activity declined but was still high for the wild-type virus and for the delta variant (GMTs 38.1 [95% CI, 21.2-69.4], p = 0.011; and 28.9 [95% CI, 16.6-52.3], p = 0.022, respectively), but not for the omicron variant (GMT 5.9 [95% CI, 3.4-9.8], p = 0.463). The percentages of neutralizing sera against the wild-type virus, delta and omicron variants increased from 70%, 65%, and 38%, before the third dose, to 93% (p < 0.001), 88% (p < 0.001), and 48% (p = 0.021) at 3 weeks after, respectively; and remained high through the 6 months for the wild-type (80%, p = 0.06) and delta (77%, p = 0.102). The third dose induced the development of a sustained SARS-CoV-2-specific-T-cell population, which persisted through 6 months.ConclusionsThe third BNT162b2 dose elicited a durable SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response and induced effective and durable neutralization of the wild-type virus and the delta variant, and to a lesser degree of the omicron variant.