Dataset Information

Vitamin C improves microvascular reactivity and peripheral tissue perfusion in septic shock patients.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Vitamin C has potential protective effects through antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. However, the effect of vitamin C supplementation on microvascular function and peripheral tissue perfusion in human sepsis remains unknown. We aimed to determine vitamin C effect on microvascular endothelial dysfunction and peripheral tissue perfusion in septic shock patients.

Methods

Patients with septic shock were prospectively included after initial resuscitation. Bedside peripheral tissue perfusion and skin microvascular reactivity in response to acetylcholine iontophoresis in the forearm area were measured before and 1 h after intravenous vitamin C supplementation (40 mg/kg). Norepinephrine dose was not modified during the studied period.

Results

We included 30 patients with septic shock. SOFA score was 11 [8-14], SAPS II was 66 [54-79], and in-hospital mortality was 33%. Half of these patients had vitamin C deficiency at inclusion. Vitamin C supplementation strongly improved microvascular reactivity (AUC 2263 [430-4246] vs 5362 [1744-10585] UI, p = 0.0004). In addition, vitamin C supplementation improved mottling score (p = 0.06), finger-tip (p = 0.0003) and knee capillary refill time (3.7 [2.6-5.5] vs 2.9 [1.9-4.7] s, p < 0.0001), as well as and central-to-periphery temperature gradient (6.1 [4.9-7.4] vs 4.6 [3.4-7.0] °C, p < 0.0001). The beneficial effects of vitamin C were observed both in patients with or without vitamin C deficiency.

Conclusion

In septic shock patients being resuscitated, vitamin C supplementation improved peripheral tissue perfusion and microvascular reactivity whatever plasma levels of vitamin C. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04778605 registered 26 January 2021.

SUBMITTER: Lavillegrand JR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8781452 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe effects of vitamin C supplementation on patients with septic shock remain controversial. We aimed to evaluate the effects of different vitamin C dosages on norepinephrine (NE) synthesis in adult patients with septic shock.MethodsA total of 58 patients with septic shock admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) between July 2021 and December 2022 were included. Patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: high-dose vitamin C (150 mg/kg/d, group A), low-dose vitamin C (50 mg/kg/d, group B), and placebo (group C). NE synthesis-related indicators (dopamine-β-hydroxylase [DβH], tyrosine hydroxylase [TH], tetrahydrobiopterin [BH4], and dopamine [DA]), plasma NE, and vitamin C levels were measured every 24 hours and analyzed. All-cause mortality within 28 days and other clinical outcomes (including Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE], Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA], and Multiple-Organ Dysfunction Syndrome [MODS] scores) were compared.ResultsChanges in TH, BH4, and DβH levels at 96 hours in groups A and B were greater than those in group C. These differences became more pronounced over the course of the intravenous vitamin C administration. Significant differences between groups A and C were detected at 96-hours TH, 72-hours BH4, 96-hours BH4, 96-hours DA, and DβH levels every 24 hours. The 96-hours TH, 96-hours BH4, and 48-hours DβH in group B were significantly higher than those in group C. The NE levels every 24 hours in groups A and B were higher than those in group C, group A and group C had a statistically significant difference. The 96-hours exogenous NE dosage in groups A and B was significantly lower than that in group C. No significant reductions in APACHE, SOFA, or MODS scores were observed in the vitamin C group, including the duration of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation. The 28-days mortality was lower in groups A and B than in group C (0%, 10%, and 16.67%, P = .187), but the difference was not significant.ConclusionFor patients with septic shock, treatment with vitamin C significantly increased TH, BH4, and DβH levels and reduced the exogenous NE dosage, but did not significantly improve clinical outcomes.

Project description:BackgroundEarly goal-directed therapy (EGDT) has become an important therapeutic management in early salvage stage of septic shock. However, splenic organs possibly remained hypoperfused and hypoxic despite fluid resuscitation. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of EGDT on hepatic perfusion in septic shock patients.MethodsA prospective observational study was carried out in early septic shock patients who were admitted to Intensive Care Unit within 24 h after onset and who met all four elements of the EGDT criteria after treatment with the standard EGDT procedure within 6 h between December 1, 2012 and November 30, 2013. The hemodynamic data were recorded, and oxygen metabolism and hepatic functions were monitored. An indocyanine green clearance test was applied to detect the hepatic perfusion. The patients' characteristics were compared before treatment (T0), immediately after EGDT (T1), and 24 h after EGDT (T2). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.org, NCT02060773.ResultsTwenty-one patients were included in the study; however, the hepatic perfusion data were not included in the analysis for two patients; therefore, 19 patients were eligible for the study. Hemodynamics data, as monitored by pulse-indicator continuous cardiac output, were obtained from 16 patients. There were no significant differences in indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate (ICG-PDR) and 15-min retention rate (R15) at T0 (11.9 ± 5.0%/min and 20.0 ± 13.2%), T1 (11.4 ± 5.1%/min and 23.6 ± 14.9%), and T2 (11.0 ± 4.5%/min and 23.7 ± 15.3%) (all P > 0.05). Both of the alterations of ICG-PDR and R15 showed no differences at T0, T1, and T2 in the patients of different subgroups that achieved different resuscitation goal numbers when elected (P > 0.05).ConclusionThere were no hepatic perfusion improvements after EGDT in the early phase of patients with septic shock.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT02060773 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02060773).

Project description:ImportanceAbnormal peripheral perfusion after septic shock resuscitation has been associated with organ dysfunction and mortality. The potential role of the clinical assessment of peripheral perfusion as a target during resuscitation in early septic shock has not been established.ObjectiveTo determine if a peripheral perfusion-targeted resuscitation during early septic shock in adults is more effective than a lactate level-targeted resuscitation for reducing mortality.Design, setting, and participantsMulticenter, randomized trial conducted at 28 intensive care units in 5 countries. Four-hundred twenty-four patients with septic shock were included between March 2017 and March 2018. The last date of follow-up was June 12, 2018.InterventionsPatients were randomized to a step-by-step resuscitation protocol aimed at either normalizing capillary refill time (n = 212) or normalizing or decreasing lactate levels at rates greater than 20% per 2 hours (n = 212), during an 8-hour intervention period.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 28 days. Secondary outcomes were organ dysfunction at 72 hours after randomization, as assessed by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (range, 0 [best] to 24 [worst]); death within 90 days; mechanical ventilation-, renal replacement therapy-, and vasopressor-free days within 28 days; intensive care unit and hospital length of stay.ResultsAmong 424 patients randomized (mean age, 63 years; 226 [53%] women), 416 (98%) completed the trial. By day 28, 74 patients (34.9%) in the peripheral perfusion group and 92 patients (43.4%) in the lactate group had died (hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.55 to 1.02]; P = .06; risk difference, -8.5% [95% CI, -18.2% to 1.2%]). Peripheral perfusion-targeted resuscitation was associated with less organ dysfunction at 72 hours (mean SOFA score, 5.6 [SD, 4.3] vs 6.6 [SD, 4.7]; mean difference, -1.00 [95% CI, -1.97 to -0.02]; P = .045). There were no significant differences in the other 6 secondary outcomes. No protocol-related serious adverse reactions were confirmed.Conclusions and relevanceAmong patients with septic shock, a resuscitation strategy targeting normalization of capillary refill time, compared with a strategy targeting serum lactate levels, did not reduce all-cause 28-day mortality.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03078712.