Dataset Information

Efficacy and Safety of Preoperative vs. Intraoperative Computed Tomography-Guided Lung Tumor Localization: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

ABSTRACT: Background: Thoracoscopic removal of small pulmonary nodules is traditionally accomplished through a two-step approach-with lesion localization in a CT suite as the first step followed by lesion removal in an operating room as the second step. While the advent of hybrid operating rooms (HORs) has fostered our ability to offer a more patient-tailored approach that allows simultaneous localization and removal of small pulmonary nodules within a single-step, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the two techniques (two- vs. single-step) are still lacking. Methods: This is a RCT conducted in an academic hospital in Taiwan between October 2018 and December 2019. To compare the outcomes of traditional two-step preoperative CT-guided small pulmonary nodule localization followed by lesion removal vs. single-step intraoperative CT-guided lesion localization with simultaneous removal performed by a dedicated team of thoracic surgeons. The analysis was conducted in an intention-to-treat fashion. The primary study endpoint was the time required for lesion localization. Secondary endpoints included radiation doses, other procedural time indices, and complication rates. Results: A total of 24 and 25 patients who received the single- and two-step approach, respectively, were included in the final analysis. The time required for lesion localization was significantly shorter for patients who underwent the single-step procedure (median: 13 min) compared with the two step-procedure (median: 32 min, p < 0.001). Similarly, the radiation dose was significantly lower for the former than the latter (median: 5.64 vs. 10.65 mSv, respectively, p = 0.001). Conclusions: The single-step procedure performed in a hybrid operating room resulted in a simultaneous reduction of both localization procedural time and radiation exposure.

SUBMITTER: Fang HY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8782202 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:To describe in detail a dataset consisting of serial four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) and 4D cone beam CT (4DCBCT) images acquired during chemoradiotherapy of 20 locally advanced, nonsmall cell lung cancer patients we have collected at our institution and shared publicly with the research community.As part of an NCI-sponsored research study 82 4DCT and 507 4DCBCT images were acquired in a population of 20 locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy. All subjects underwent concurrent radiochemotherapy to a total dose of 59.4-70.2 Gy using daily 1.8 or 2 Gy fractions. Audio-visual biofeedback was used to minimize breathing irregularity during all fractions, including acquisition of all 4DCT and 4DCBCT acquisitions in all subjects. Target, organs at risk, and implanted fiducial markers were delineated by a physician in the 4DCT images. Image coordinate system origins between 4DCT and 4DCBCT were manipulated in such a way that the images can be used to simulate initial patient setup in the treatment position. 4DCT images were acquired on a 16-slice helical CT simulator with 10 breathing phases and 3 mm slice thickness during simulation. In 13 of the 20 subjects, 4DCTs were also acquired on the same scanner weekly during therapy. Every day, 4DCBCT images were acquired on a commercial onboard CBCT scanner. An optically tracked external surrogate was synchronized with CBCT acquisition so that each CBCT projection was time stamped with the surrogate respiratory signal through in-house software and hardware tools. Approximately 2500 projections were acquired over a period of 8-10 minutes in half-fan mode with the half bow-tie filter. Using the external surrogate, the CBCT projections were sorted into 10 breathing phases and reconstructed with an in-house FDK reconstruction algorithm. Errors in respiration sorting, reconstruction, and acquisition were carefully identified and corrected.4DCT and 4DCBCT images are available in DICOM format and structures through DICOM-RT RTSTRUCT format. All data are stored in the Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA, http://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/) as collection 4D-Lung and are publicly available.Due to high temporal frequency sampling, redundant (4DCT and 4DCBCT) data at similar timepoints, oversampled 4DCBCT, and fiducial markers, this dataset can support studies in image-guided and image-guided adaptive radiotherapy, assessment of 4D voxel trajectory variability, and development and validation of new tools for image registration and motion management.

Project description:BackgroundAs a minimally invasive method, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) was more accurate than non-invasive methods such as positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) to evaluate the lymph nodes in preoperative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PET/CT has more anatomical advantages than PET scanning and is more accurate in lung cancer staging. However, no relevant studies have comparatively evaluated PET/CT and EBUS-TBNA for NSCLC patients.MethodsA total of 112 patients were included in this retrospective analysis. The golden diagnosis of N2 status was postoperative pathological results. In EBUS-TBNA puncture specimens, if clear malignant tumor cells could be seen, the results were taken as positive. In PET/CT image analysis, the CT values, short diameter, and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of each lymph node were recorded to evaluate N2 status. The results of PET/CT and EBUS-TBNA were compared with the final pathological results, and respective sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated. - Then, the patients were divided into adenocarcinoma group and squamous cell carcinoma group -and the results were calculated and compared with the above method.ResultsThe results showed that EBUS-TBNA had a higher diagnostic value for mediastinal lymph nodes than PET/CT, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). In NSCLC patients, the results showed that the sensitivity (P=0.013), specificity (P<0.001), PPV (P<0.001), NPV (P<0.001), and accuracy (P<0.001) of EBUS-TBNA were higher than that of PET/CT (AUC =0.954 and 0.636, respectively). In adenocarcinoma cases, specificity (P<0.001), PPV (P<0.001), NPV (P<0.001), and accuracy (P<0.001) of EBUS-TBNA were higher than that of PET/CT (AUC =0.957 and 0.596, respectively).In cases with squamous cell carcinoma, specificity (P=0.003), PPV (P<0.001), and accuracy (P<0.001) of EBUS-TBNA were higher than PET/CT (AUC =0.952 and 0.657, respectively).ConclusionsFor preoperative diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node metastases in NSCLC, EBUS-TBNA is more accurate than PET/CT. For those patients with suspected mediastinal lymph node metastasis, EBUS-TBNA should be preferred method to evaluate the status of mediastinal lymph nodes.

Project description:To investigate the value of preoperative positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in differentiating the invasive degree of hypometabolic lung adenocarcinoma. We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent PET/CT examination, high-resolution computed tomography, and surgical resection for low-metabolism lung adenocarcinoma in our hospital between June 2016 and December 2021. We also investigated the relationship between the preoperative PET/CT findings and the pathological subtype of hypometabolic lung adenocarcinoma. A total of 128 lesions were found in 113 patients who underwent resection for lung adenocarcinoma, including 20 minimally invasive adenocarcinomas (MIA) and 108 invasive adenocarcinomas (IAC), whose preoperative PET/CT showed low metabolism. There were significant differences in the largest diameter (Dmax), lesion type, maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), SUVindex (the ratio of SUVmax of lesion to SUVmax of contralateral normal lung paranchyma), fasting blood glucose, lobulation, spiculation, and pleura indentation between the MIA and IAC groups (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the Dmax (odds ratio (OR) = 1.413, 95% confidence interval (CI: 1.155-1.729, p = 0.001)) and SUVmax (OR = 12.137, 95% CI: 1.068-137.900, p = 0.044) were independent risk factors for predicting the hypometabolic IAC (p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the Dmax ≥ 10.5 mm and SUVmax ≥ 0.85 were the cut-off values for differentiating MIA from IAC, with high sensitivity (84.3% and 75.9%, respectively) and specificity (84.5% and 85.0%, respectively), the Combined Diagnosis showed higher sensitivity (91.7%) and specificity (85.0%). The PET/CT findings correlated with the subtype of hypometabolic lung adenocarcinoma. The parameters Dmax and SUVmax were independent risk factors for predicting IAC, and the sensitivity of Combined Diagnosis prediction is better.

Dataset Information

Efficacy and Safety of Preoperative vs. Intraoperative Computed Tomography-Guided Lung Tumor Localization: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets