Dataset Information

Development of a Mitochondrial Myopathy-Composite Assessment Tool.

ABSTRACT:

Background

'Mitochondrial Myopathy' (MM) refers to genetically-confirmed Primary Mitochondrial Disease (PMD) that predominantly impairs skeletal muscle function. Validated outcome measures encompassing core MM domains of muscle weakness, muscle fatigue, imbalance, impaired dexterity, and exercise intolerance do not exist. The goal of this study was to validate clinically-meaningful, quantitative outcome measures specific to MM.

Methods

This was a single centre study. Objective measures evaluated included hand-held dynamometry, balance assessments, Nine Hole Peg Test (9HPT), Functional Dexterity Test (FDT), 30 second Sit to Stand (30s STS), and 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Results were assessed as z-scores, with < -2 standard deviations considered abnormal. Performance relative to the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) of functional mobility was assessed by Pearson's correlation.

Results

In genetically-confirmed MM participants [n = 59, mean age 21.6 ± 13.9 (range 7 - 64.6 years), 44.1% male], with nuclear gene aetiologies, n = 18/59, or mitochondrial (mtDNA) aetiologies, n = 41/59, dynamometry measurements demonstrated both proximal [dominant elbow flexion (-2.6 ± 2.1, mean z-score ± standard deviation, SD), hip flexion (-2.5 ± 2.3), and knee flexion (-2.8 ± 1.3)] and distal muscle weakness [wrist extension (-3.4 ± 1.7), palmar pinch (-2.5 ± 2.8), and ankle dorsiflexion (-2.4 ± 2.5)]. Balance [Tandem Stance (TS) Eyes Open (-3.2 ± 8.8, n = 53) and TS Eyes Closed (-2.6 ± 2.7, n = 52)] and dexterity [FDT (-5.9 ± 6.0, n = 44) and 9HPT (-8.3 ± 11.2, n = 53)] assessments also revealed impairment. Exercise intolerance was confirmed by strength-based 30s STS test (-2.0 ± 0.8, n = 38) and mobility-based 6MWT mean z-score (-2.9 ± 1.3, n = 46) with significant decline in minute distances (slope -0.9, p = 0.03, n = 46). Muscle fatigue was quantified by dynamometry repetitions with strength decrement noted between first and sixth repetitions at dominant elbow flexors (-14.7 ± 2.2%, mean ± standard error, SEM, n = 21). All assessments were incorporated in the MM-Composite Assessment Tool (MM-COAST). MM-COAST composite score for MM participants was 1.3± 0.1(n = 53) with a higher score indicating greater MM disease severity, and correlated to NSAA (r = 0.64, p < 0.0001, n = 52) to indicate clinical meaning. Test-retest reliability of MM-COAST assessments in an MM subset (n = 14) revealed an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.59-0.92) indicating good reliability.

Conclusions

We have developed and successfully validated a MM-specific Composite Assessment Tool to quantify the key domains of MM, shown to be abnormal in a Definite MM cohort. MM-COAST may hold particular utility as a meaningful outcome measure in future MM intervention trials.

SUBMITTER: Flickinger J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8782422 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe context of healthcare organizations such as hospitals is increasingly accepted as having the potential to influence the use of new knowledge. However, the mechanisms by which the organizational context influences evidence-based practices are not well understood. Current measures of organizational context lack a theory-informed approach, lack construct clarity and generally have modest psychometric properties. This paper presents the development and initial psychometric validation of the Alberta Context Tool (ACT), an eight dimension measure of organizational context for healthcare settings.MethodsThree principles guided the development of the ACT: substantive theory, brevity, and modifiability. The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARiHS) framework and related literature were used to guide selection of items in the ACT. The ACT was required to be brief enough to be tolerated in busy and resource stretched work settings and to assess concepts of organizational context that were potentially modifiable. The English version of the ACT was completed by 764 nurses (752 valid responses) working in seven Canadian pediatric care hospitals as part of its initial validation. Cronbach's alpha, exploratory factor analysis, analysis of variance, and tests of association were used to assess instrument reliability and validity.ResultsFactor analysis indicated a 13-factor solution (accounting for 59.26% of the variance in 'organizational context'). The composition of the factors was similar to those originally conceptualized. Cronbach's alpha for the 13 factors ranged from .54 to .91 with 4 factors performing below the commonly accepted alpha cut off of .70. Bivariate associations between instrumental research utilization levels (which the ACT was developed to predict) and the ACT's 13 factors were statistically significant at the 5% level for 12 of the 13 factors. Each factor also showed a trend of increasing mean score ranging from the lowest level to the highest level of instrumental research use, indicating construct validity.ConclusionsTo date, no completely satisfactory measures of organizational context are available for use in healthcare. The ACT assesses several core domains to provide a comprehensive account of organizational context in healthcare settings. The tool's strengths are its brevity (allowing it to be completed in busy healthcare settings) and its focus on dimensions of organizational context that are modifiable. Refinements of the instrument for acute, long term care, and home care settings are ongoing.