Dataset Information

The value of diffusion weighted imaging-alberta stroke program early CT score in predicting stroke-associated pneumonia in patients with acute cerebral infarction: a retrospective study

ABSTRACT:

Background

In this study, we aimed to investigate the value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (DWI-ASPECTS) in predicting stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Methods

A total of 291 patients who suffered acute cerebral infarction for the first time were included in this retrospective study. DWI-ASPECTS was assessed and clinical data were collected in order to find the risk factors of SAP, and a logistic regression model was used to investigate the effect of predicting SAP. Furthermore, correlation analysis was used to explore the relationship between DWI-ASPECTS and the immume status of the body.

Results

Among the 291 patients, 74 (25.4%) subjects were diagnosed with SAP. Compared with non-SAP, the patients with SAP were older and had a higher rate of atrial fibrillation (AF), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores. The SAP group also had a significantly lower DWI-ASPECTS than did the non-SAP group (P < 0.01). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, the DWI-ASPECTS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.438; 95% CI [1.158–1.787]; P < 0.01) remained significant after adjusting for confounders. What’s more, the predictive ability of DWI-ASPECTS (AUC = 0.743 >0.7, 95% CI [0.678–0.800]) had acceptable discriminatory abilities. By the correlation analysis, DWI-ASPECTS was found to be negatively correlated with the count of white blood cell, neutrophils, monocytes, neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and positively correlated with the count of lymphocytes.

Conclusions

DWI-ASPECTS grades could predict stroke-associated pneumonia for patients with acute ischemic stroke, and combining grade with age, AF, or NIHSS could predict SAP events more accurately.

SUBMITTER: Zhao D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8783557 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and aims:Assessment of ischemic lesions on computed tomography or MRI diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) is widely used to guide acute stroke treatment. However, it has never been defined how many voxels need to be affected to label a DWI-ASPECTS region ischemic. We aimed to assess the effect of various lesion load thresholds on DWI-ASPECTS and compare this automated analysis with visual rating. Materials and methods:We analyzed overlap of individual DWI lesions of 315 patients from the previously published predictive value of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery study with a probabilistic ASPECTS template derived from 221 CT images. We applied multiple lesion load thresholds per DWI-ASPECTS region (>0, >1, >10, and >20% in each DWI-ASPECTS region) to compute DWI-ASPECTS for each patient and compared the results to visual reading by an experienced stroke neurologist. Results:By visual rating, median ASPECTS was 9, 84 patients had a DWI-ASPECTS score ?7. Mean DWI lesion volume was 22.1 (±35) ml. In contrast, by use of >0, >1-, >10-, and >20%-thresholds, median DWI-ASPECTS was 1, 5, 8, and 10; 97.1% (306), 72.7% (229), 41% (129), and 25.7% (81) had DWI-ASPECTS ?7, respectively. Overall agreement between automated assessment and visual rating was low for every threshold used (>0%: ?w?=?0.020 1%: ?w?=?0.151; 10%: ?w?=?0.386; 20% ?w?=?0.381). Agreement for dichotomized DWI-ASPECTS ranged from fair to substantial (?7: >10% ??=?0.48; >20% ??=?0.45; ?5: >10% ??=?0.528; and >20% ??=?0.695). Conclusion:Overall agreement between automated and the standard used visual scoring is low regardless of the lesion load threshold used. However, dichotomized scoring achieved more comparable results. Varying lesion load thresholds had a critical impact on patient selection by ASPECTS. Of note, the relatively low lesion volume and lack of patients with large artery occlusion in our cohort may limit generalizability of these findings.

Project description:Background and purposeAdmission infarct core lesion size is an important determinant of management and outcome in acute (<9 hours) stroke. Our purposes were to: (1) determine the optimal CT perfusion parameter to define infarct core using various postprocessing platforms; and (2) establish the degree of variability in threshold values between these different platforms.MethodsWe evaluated 48 consecutive cases with vessel occlusion and admission CT perfusion and diffusion-weighted imaging within 3 hours of each other. CT perfusion was acquired with a "second-generation" 66-second biphasic cine protocol and postprocessed using "standard" (from 2 vendors, "A-std" and "B-std") and "delay-corrected" (from 1 vendor, "A-dc") commercial software. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed comparing each CT perfusion parameter-both absolute and normalized to the contralateral uninvolved hemisphere-between infarcted and noninfarcted regions as defined by coregistered diffusion-weighted imaging.ResultsCerebral blood flow had the highest accuracy (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve) for all 3 platforms (P<0.01). The maximal areas under the curve for each parameter were: absolute cerebral blood flow 0.88, cerebral blood volume 0.81, and mean transit time 0.82 and relative Cerebral blood flow 0.88, cerebral blood volume 0.83, and mean transit time 0.82. Optimal receiver operating characteristic operating point thresholds varied significantly between different platforms (Friedman test, P<0.01).ConclusionsAdmission absolute and normalized "second-generation" cine acquired CT cerebral blood flow lesion volumes correlate more closely with diffusion-weighted imaging-defined infarct core than do those of CT cerebral blood volume or mean transit time. Although limited availability of diffusion-weighted imaging for some patients creates impetus to develop alternative methods of estimating core, the marked variability in quantification among different postprocessing software limits generalizability of parameter map thresholds between platforms.

Project description:BackgroundHigh-quality neuroimages can be viewed using a medical app installed on a smartphone. Although interdevice agreement between smartphone and desktop PC monitor was found to be favorable for evaluating computed tomography images, there are no interdevice agreement data for diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).ObjectiveThe aim of our study was to compare DWI interpretation using the Join smartphone app with that using a desktop PC monitor, in terms of interdevice and interrater agreement and elapsed interpretation time.MethodsThe ischemic change in the DWI of consecutive patients with acute stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory was graded by 2 vascular neurologists using the Join smartphone app and a desktop PC monitor. The vascular neurologists were blinded to all patient information. Each image was categorized as either Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Scores (DWI-ASPECTS) ≥7 or DWI-ASPECTS <7 according to the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy. We analyzed interdevice agreement and interrater agreement with respect to DWI-ASPECTS. Elapsed interpretation time was compared between DWI-ASPECTS evaluated by the Join smartphone app and a desktop PC monitor.ResultsWe analyzed the images of 111 patients (66% male; median age=69 years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on admission=4). Interdevice agreement regarding DWI-ASPECTS between the smartphone and the desktop PC monitor was favorable (vascular neurologist 1: κ=0.777, P<.001, vascular neurologist 2: κ=0.787, P<.001). Interrater agreement was also satisfactory for the smartphone (κ=0.710, P<.001) and the desktop PC monitor (κ=0.663, P<.001). Median elapsed interpretation time was similar between the smartphone and the desktop PC monitor (vascular neurologist 1: 1.7 min vs 1.6 min; P=.64); vascular neurologist 2: 2.4 min vs 2.0 min; P=.14).ConclusionsThe use of a smartphone app enables vascular neurologists to estimate DWI-ASPECTS accurately and rapidly. The Join medical smartphone app shows great promise in the management of acute stroke.