Dataset Information

Indocyanine green versus technetium-99m with blue dye for sentinel lymph node detection in early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The fluorescent dye indocyanine green (ICG) has emerged as a promising tracer for intraoperative detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in early-stage cervical cancer. Although researchers suggest the SLN detection of ICG is equal to the more conventional combined approach of a radiotracer and blue dye, no consensus has been reached.

Aims

We aimed to assess the differences in overall and bilateral SLN detection rates with ICG versus the combined approach, the radiotracer technetium-99m (^99m Tc) with blue dye.

Methods and results

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to January 1, 2020 and included studies reporting on a comparison of SLN detection with ICG versus ^99m Tc with blue dye in early-stage cervical cancer. The overall and bilateral detection rates were pooled with random-effects meta-analyses. From 118 studies retrieved seven studies (one cross-sectional; six retrospective cohorts) were included, encompassing 589 patients. No significant differences were found in the pooled overall SLN detection rate of ICG versus ^99m Tc with blue dye. Meta-analyses of all studies showed ICG to result in a higher bilateral SLN detection rate than ^99m Tc with blue dye; 90.3% (95%CI, 79.8-100.0%) with ICG versus 73.5% (95%CI, 66.4-80.6%) with 99mTc with blue dye. This resulted in a significant and clinically relevant risk difference of 16.6% (95%CI, 5.3-28.0%). With sensitivity analysis, the risk difference of the bilateral detection rate maintained in favor of ICG but was no longer significant (13.2%, 95%CI -0.8-27.3%).

Conclusion

ICG appears to provide higher bilateral SLN detection rates compared to ^99m Tc with blue dye in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. However, in adherence with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines, the quality of evidence is too low to provide strong recommendations and directly omit the combined approach of ^99m Tc with blue dye.

SUBMITTER: Baeten IGT

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8789613 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionNowadays, two predominant methods for detecting sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in cervical cancer are in use. The most conventional method is a combination of a radiotracer, technetium-99m (99mTc) and blue dye. More recently, another method for SLN mapping using indocyanine green (ICG) is becoming widely accepted. ICG is a fluorescent dye, visualised intraoperatively with near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging, providing real-time visual navigation. The presumed advantages of ICG over 99mTc, that is, being cheaper, non-radioactive and logistically more attractive, are only valuable if its detection rate proves to be at least non-inferior. Before omitting the well-functioning and evidence-based combined approach of 99mTc and blue dye, we aim to provide prospective evidence on the non-inferiority of ICG with NIR fluorescence imaging.Methods and analysisWe initiated a prospective non-inferiority study with a paired comparison of both SLN methods in a single sample of 101 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA-IB2 or IIA1 cervical cancer receiving primary surgical treatment. All patients undergo SLN mapping with ICG and NIR fluorescence imaging in adjunct to mapping with 99mTc (including single photon emission computed tomography with X-ray computed tomography (SPECT/CT)) and blue dye. Surgeons start SLN detection with ICG while being blinded for the preoperative outcome of SPECT/CT to avoid biased detection with ICG. Primary endpoint of this study is bilateral SLN detection rate of both methods (ie, detection of at least one SLN in each hemipelvis). Since we compare strategies for SLN mapping that are already applied in current daily practice for different types of cancer, no additional risks or burdens are expected from these study procedures.Ethics and disseminationThe current study is approved by the Medical Ethics Research Committee Utrecht (reference number 21-014). Findings arising from this study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, academic conferences and through patient organisations.Trial registration numberNL9011 and EudraCT 2020-005134-15.

Project description:BackgroundThe breast cancer treatment paradigm has shifted to neoadjuvant treatment. There are many advantages to neoadjuvant treatment, such as tumor downsizing, in vivo tumor biology testing, treating micrometastasis, and achieving complete pathological response (a surrogate marker for overall survival). However, in the post neoadjuvant settings, sentinel lymph node biopsy can be done using a dual staining technique to decrease the false-negative rate (FNR) and increase the detection rate. However, many hospitals are not equipped to use radioisotopes. Here we investigate the detection rate and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in post neoadjuvant treatment breast cancer, comparing radioisotope, isosulfan blue, and indocyanine green (ICG) approaches.Material and methodsThis prospective study includes breast cancer patients (T2-4, N1-2) who had received neoadjuvant treatment. Carcinomas were confirmed by tissue pathology. Patients who had previous surgical biopsy or surgery involving the axillary regions, and those with a history of allergy to ICG, isosulfan blue, or radioisotope were excluded from the study.ResultThe study was done between July 1, 2019 to March 31, 2020. The mean age of participants was 53 years. Fourteen (60.87%) were post-menopause, two (8.7%) were perimenopause, and seven (30.43%) were premenopause. The clinical-stage distribution of the participants was: 2A (8.7%), 2B (34.78%), 3A (43.48%), and 3B (13.04%). The primary tumor size was 4.82 ± 2.73 cm. The lymph node size was 1.8 ± 0.96 cm. The detection rates at the individual level were 95.23% with ICG, 85.71% with isosulfan blue, and 85.71% with a radioisotope. The detection rate increased up to 100% when the ICG and blue dye methods were combined. The FNRs of sentinel lymph node biopsy at the individual level were: 10% using ICG, 30% using isosulfan blue, and 40% using radioisotope. At the lymph node level, the detection rates were 93.22% using ICG, 81.78% using isosulfan blue, and 53.87% using a radioisotope. The FNRs of sentinel lymph node biopsy at the lymph node level were 19.05% with ICG, 21.43% with isosulfan blue, and 18.03% with a radioisotope. However, the FNR was less than 10% when ICG, isosulfan blue, and a radioisotope were combined.ConclusionWe can perform sentinel lymph node biopsy by combining blue dye with ICG as an optional modality and achieve a comparable outcome with combine radioisotope in locally advanced breast cancer after neoadjuvant treatment.

Project description:BackgroundMethylene blue as tracer used in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) have low detection rate and high false negative rate. Indocyanine green (ICG) can detect the flow of subcutaneous lymphatic vessels and the position of lymph nodes dynamically. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of ICG combined with methylene blue staining in SLNB of breast cancer.MethodsOne hundred and fifty-six early breast cancer patients treated at our hospital from July 2020 to May 2022 were enrolled in this study. SLNB was performed by ICG combined with methylene blue staining under the guidance of the fluorescent tracer navigation system FLI-10B. Standard axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis confirmed by intraoperative frozen pathology, while low ALND was performed in patients with negative SLNs. According to the staining condition, the SLNs were divided into: (I) the combined group (SLNs with methylene blue staining and/or ICG luminescence); (II) the methylene blue group (SLNs with methylene blue staining alone); and (III) the ICG group (SLNs with ICG luminescence alone). The detection rate, accuracy, sensitivity, and false negative rate of SLNB were compared among the 3 groups.ResultsA total of 592 SLNs were detected in the combined group (average 3.8 SLNs), yielding a detection rate of 97.4%; the accuracy, sensitivity, and false negative rates were 97.4%, 92.7%, and 7.3%. In the methylene blue group, 390 SLNs were detected (average 2.5 SLNs), yielding a detection rate of 84.6%; the accuracy, sensitivity, and false negative rates were 83.3%, 89.1%, and 10.9%. A total of 483 SLNs were detected in the ICG group (average 3.1 SLNs), the detection rate was 92.9%; the accuracy, sensitivity and false negative rates were 91.7%, 90.9%, and 9.1%. The average number of detected SLNs, detection rate and accuracy rate in the combined group were higher than those in the methylene blue group (P<0.05), and the accuracy rate of the combined group was higher than that of the ICG group (P<0.05).ConclusionsICG combined with methylene blue staining is a promising and effective tracing strategy in the SLNB of breast cancer with high detection and accuracy rates.

Project description:IntroductionSentinel lymph node biopsy is the technique recommended for the axillary staging of patients with breast cancer in the initial stages without clinical axillary involvement. Three techniques are widely used globally to detect sentinel lymph nodes: patent blue, the radiopharmaceutical technetium 99 with gamma probe, and the combination of these two.ObjectivesTo evaluate the sentinel lymph node detection rate with an innovative technique: indocyanine green (ICG) associated with fluorescence in breast cancer patients, and compare it with patent blue and a combination of patent blue and indocyanine green.Methods99 patients were sequentially (not randomly) allocated into 3 arms with 33 patients submitted to sentinel lymph node techniques. One arm underwent patent blue dying, the other indocyanine green, and the third received a combination of both. The detection rates between arms were compared.ResultsThe detection rate in identifying the sentinel lymph node was 78.8% with patent blue, 93.9% with indocyanine green, and 100% with the combination. Indocyanine green identified two sentinel nodes in 48.5% of patients; the other groups more commonly had only one node identified. The mean time to sentinel lymph node identification was 20.6 ± 10.7 SD (standard deviation) minutes among patients submitted to the patent blue dye, 8.6 ± 6.6 minutes in the indocyanine green arm, and 10 ± 8.9 minutes in the combined group (P<0.001; Student's test). The mean surgery time was 69.4 ± 16.9; 55.1 ± 13.9; and 69.4 ± 19.3 minutes respectively (P<0.001; Student's test).ConclusionsThe sentinel lymph node detection rate by fluorescence using indocyanine green was 93.9%, considered adequate. The rates using patent blue, indocyanine green, and patent blue plus indocyanine green (combined) were significantly different, and the indocyanine green alone is also acceptable, since it has a good performance in sentinel lymph node identification and it can avoid tattooing, with a 100% sentinel lymph node detection rate when combined with patent blue.