Dataset Information

Patterns of adjuvant treatment and survival outcomes in stage I uterine carcinosarcoma

ABSTRACT: Highlights • 5-year survival for stage I uterine carcinosarcoma without adjuvant therapy is 43%.• Nationally 40% of stage I uterine carcinosarcoma do not receive adjuvant therapy.• Adjuvant chemotherapy alone improved OS and CSS in stage I uterine carcinosarcoma.

Objective

To determine patterns in type and sequence of adjuvant treatment and associated differences in overall survival among women with Stage I uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS).

Methods

Women with stage I UCS from 2000 to 2015 were identified through the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database linked to Medicare-based claims follow-up data through 2016. Data including demographics, co-morbidities, surgical procedure, surgical pathology and type and sequence of adjuvant treatment were collected. The primary study outcome was overall survival (OS) by type and sequence of adjuvant therapy. Cancer specific survival was also analyzed.

Results

A total of 755 women with Stage I UCS were identified. Of these, 56.3% (n = 445) received adjuvant therapy, whereas 43.7% (n = 330) did not. In comparison to no adjuvant treatment, an overall survival benefit was noted with receipt of chemotherapy alone for women with Stage I disease (log rank p < 0.01). Pairwise comparisons did not show a benefit in OS of concurrent RT-chemo, sequential RT-chemo, or sequential chemo-RT, over chemotherapy alone (p > 0.05 for all). Likewise, radiation alone and no treatment were associated with worse OS compared to chemotherapy alone (p < 0.001 for both). Adjusted Cox regression models demonstrated an OS benefit only in the chemotherapy alone cohort for Stage I disease (HR 0.43 95% CI 0.32, 0.60, p < 0.0001), as well as for CSS (HR 0.41, 95 %CI 0.26, 0.62, p < 0.0001), compared to no treatment.

Conclusions

In comparison to no adjuvant therapy, an overall survival and cancer-specific survival benefit was noted with receipt of chemotherapy alone in Stage I UCS.

SUBMITTER: Cory L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8790468 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) and carcinosarcomas (CSs) are rare, highly aggressive variants of endometrial cancer. No reliable tumor biomarkers are currently available to guide response to treatment or detection of early recurrence in USC/CS patients. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) identified using ultrasensitive technology such as droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) may represent a novel platform for the identification of occult disease. We explored the use of personalized ctDNA markers for monitoring USC and CS patients. Tumor and plasma samples from USC/CS patients were collected at the time of surgery and/or during the treatment course for assessment of tumor-specific somatic structural variants (SSVs) by a clinical-grade next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform (i.e., Foundation Medicine) and a droplet digital PCR instrument (Raindance, ddPCR). The level of ctDNA was quantified by droplet digital PCR in plasma samples and correlated to clinical findings, including CA-125 serum and/or computed tomography (CT) scanning results. The genomic-profiling-based assay identified mutated "driver" target genes for ctDNA analysis in all USC/CS patients. In multiple patients, longitudinal ctDNA testing was able to detect the presence of cancer cells before the recurrent tumor was clinically detectable by either CA-125 or CT scanning. Persistent undetectable levels of ctDNA following initial treatment were associated with prolonged progression-free and overall survival. In a USC patient, CA-125 and TP53 mutations but not PIK3CA mutations become undetectable in the plasma at the time of recurrence, suggesting that more than one customized probe should be used for monitoring ctDNA. Longitudinal ctDNA testing using tumor-informed assays may identify the presence of residual tumors, predict responses to treatment, and identify early recurrences in USC/CS patients. Recognition of disease persistence and/or recurrence through ctDNA surveillance may allow earlier treatment of recurrent disease and has the potential to change clinical practice in the management of USC and CS patients. CtDNA validation studies in USC/CS patients prospectively enrolled in treatment trials are warranted.

Project description:BackgroundThe survival impact of multi-agent (MAC) compared with single-agent (SAC) adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in elderly patients with stage III colon cancer (CC) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare survival outcomes of MAC and SAC in this population utilizing the National Cancer Database (NCDB).Patients and methodsPatients aged ≥70 years with pathological stage III CC diagnosed in 2004-2015 were identified in the NCDB. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted, and Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify associations between MAC vs. SAC and overall survival (OS).ResultsAmong 41 707 elderly patients (≥70 years old) with stage III CC, about half (n = 20 257; 48.5%) received AC; the majority (n = 12 923, 63.8%) received MAC. The median age was 79 (range 70-90). The majority were female (n = 11 201, 55.3%), Caucasians (88%) and had moderately differentiated tumor grade (n = 12 619, 62.3%), tumor size >4 cm (11 785, 58.2%), and negative surgical margins (18 496, 91.3%). Low-risk stage III CC constituted 50.6% (n = 10 264) of the study population. High-risk stage III CC was associated with worse OS compared with low-risk disease (HR 0.35, 0.34-0.36, P < .001). Multi-agent chemotherapy was associated with a better 5-year OS compared with SAC (P < .001). High-risk stage III patients who received MAC vs. SAC had an OS of 4.2 vs. 3.4 years, respectively (P < .001). Low-risk stage III patients who received MAC vs. SAC had a median OS of 8.5 vs. 7 years (P < .001). In univariate and multivariable analyses, male sex, positive surgical margin, insurance and facility types, age, year of diagnosis, tumor size, and Charlson-Deyo score of >2 were associated with worse OS (P < .05).ConclusionsAny adjuvant chemotherapy has a trend of survival benefits. Multi-agent chemotherapy seems to have an enhanced benefit in the 70-75 age group. Multi-agent chemotherapy seemed to have similar efficacy as SAC in those aged >76 years.