Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Group-tailored feedback on online mental health screening for university students: using cluster analysis


ABSTRACT:

Background

The method by which mental health screening result reports are given affects the user’s health behavior. Lists with the distribution of scores in various mental health areas is difficult for users to understand, and if the results are negative, they may feel more embarrassed than necessary. Therefore, we propose using group-tailored feedback, grouping people of similar mental health types by cluster analysis for comprehensive explanations of multidimensional mental health.

Methods

This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted using a qualitative approach based on cluster analysis. Data were collected via a developed mental screening website, with depression, anxiety, sleep problems, perfectionism, procrastination, and attention assessed for 2 weeks in January 2020 in Korea. Participants were randomly recruited, and sample size was 174. Total was divided into 25 with severe depression/anxiety (SDA+) and 149 without severe depression/anxiety (SDA-) according to the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 criteria. Cluster analysis was conducted in each group, and an ANOVA was performed to find significant clusters. Thereafter, structured discussion was performed with mental health professionals to define the features of the clusters and construct the feedback content initially. Thirteen expert counselors were interviewed to reconstruct the content and validate the effectiveness of the developed feedback.

Results

SDA- was divided into 3 using the k-means algorithm, which showed the best performance (silhouette score = 0.32, CH score = 91.67) among the clustering methods. Perfectionism and procrastination were significant factors in discretizing the groups. SDA+ subgroups were integrated because only 25 people belonged to this group, and they need professional help rather than self-care. Mental status and treatment recommendations were determined for each group, and group names were assigned to represent their features. The developed feedback was assessed to improve mental health literacy (MHL) through integrative and understandable explanations of multidimensional mental health. Moreover, it appeared that a sense of belonging was induced to reduce reluctance to face the feedback.

Conclusions

This study suggests group-tailored feedback using cluster analysis, which identifies groups of university students by integrating multidimensions of mental health. These methods can help students increase their interest in mental health and improve MHL to enable timely help.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s12875-021-01622-6).

SUBMITTER: Lee S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8790855 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7277724 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10908025 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7084566 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5938694 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC9404754 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7370060 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7829670 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7265454 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7125436 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5703533 | biostudies-literature