Dataset Information

Therapeutic Role of Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy in 170 Patients With Ovarian Clear Cell Cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

We evaluated the therapeutic role of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in patients with ovarian clear cell cancer (OCCC).

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed 170 OCCC patients diagnosed at two hospitals in China between April 2010 and August 2020. Clinical data were abstracted, and patients were followed until February 2021. Patients were divided into retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and no lymphadenectomy groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Statistical differences were determined by the log-rank test. The COX proportional hazards regression model was applied to identify predictors of tumor recurrence.

Results

The median age was 52 years; 90 (52.9%) and 80 (47.1%) patients were diagnosed as early and advanced stage, respectively. Clinically positive and negative nodes was found in 40 (23.5%) and 119 (70.0%) patients, respectively. Of all the 170 patients, 124 (72.9%) patients underwent retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy, while 46 (27.1%) did not. The estimated 2-year PFS and 5-year OS rates were 71.4% and 65.9% in the lymphadenectomy group, and 72.0% and 73.7% in no lymphadenectomy group (p = 0.566 and 0.669, respectively). There was also no difference in survival between the two groups when subgroup analysis was performed stratified by early and advanced stage, or in patients with clinically negative nodes. Multivariate analysis showed that retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy were not an independent predictor of tumor recurrence.

Conclusion

Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy provided no survival benefit in patients diagnosed with OCCC. A prospective clinical trial is needed to confirm the present results.

SUBMITTER: Gao W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8791852 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is an important component of the multimodal treatment which cures most patients diagnosed with testicular germ cell tumors. Considering the high cure rates achieved, research focus in recent years has been directed toward improving quality of life and decreasing long-term treatment related sequelae. Consequently, the role of RPLND has evolved over the past 3 decades in both low-stage and advanced testicular cancer. The use of RPLND in clinically stage I and low volume stage II disease may offer the advantages of treating retroperitoneal teratoma which is present in 15% to 20% of patients, avoiding chemotherapy and reducing the need for frequent imaging during follow-up. Similarly, ongoing studies are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of RPLND for the treatment of early stage seminoma to avoid the long-term effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. RPLND is traditionally used for the treatment of residual masses >1 cm after completion of chemotherapy. Its role in subcentimeter residual masses remains somewhat controversial given the fact that 25% to 30% of these patients are found to harbor either teratoma or viable nonteratomatous germ cell tumors. The presence of teratoma increases the probability of teratoma in metastatic sites. Modified unilateral templates were developed based on early mapping studies with the aim of preserving antegrade ejaculation. Recent data suggests initial mapping studies underestimated the risk of contralateral retroperitoneal metastases which may reach 32%. Furthermore, antegrade ejaculation may be preserved in >95% of patients undergoing bilateral nerve sparing primary RPLND and >80% undergoing nerve-sparing PC-RPLND, which, in our view is the more prudent oncologic approach. Recently, multiple series have demonstrated the safety and short-term efficacy of minimally invasive RPLND; however, larger studies with prolonged follow-up are required to validate the long-term oncologic efficacy of newer techniques.

Project description:Study designRetrospective cohort study.IntroductionDebates remain regarding the role of lymphadenectomy in patients with apparent stage IA endometrial cancer, especially subtypes with a favorable prognosis. This study aimed to explore the prognostic value of staging surgeries in apparent stage IA endometrial endometrioid cancer patients in a retrospective cohort study.MethodsCases from June 1, 2010 to June 1, 2017 were reviewed in patients with pathologically confirmed endometrial endometrioid carcinoma limited to <1/2 of the myometrium, without extrauterine metastasis on preoperative evaluation and during surgical inspection. Survival outcomes were compared between patients with and without lymphadenectomy and between patients with and without metastasis to lymph nodes.ResultsIn total, 1,312 eligible patients were included, among which 836 underwent staging surgeries and 476 underwent simple hysterectomy. Twenty-eight patients were found with metastasis to retroperitoneal lymph nodes. After a median follow-up of 57.4 months, lost to follow-up, recurrence, death, and cancer-specific death occurred in 28, 39, 24, and 16 patients, respectively. In a univariate analysis, lymphadenectomy of the pelvis with or without para-aortic lymph nodes had no significant impact on disease-free survival, overall survival or cancer-specific overall survival (p values >0.05). However, after adjusting for important baseline risk factors [menopausal status, tumor differentiation, maximum diameter and location, lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) status, and postoperative adjuvant therapy), lymphadenectomy resulted in significantly improved survival outcomes (p values <0.05). Menopause (odds ratio [OR] 4.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-16.4, p=0.015), tumor diameter larger than 2 cm (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.3-16.0, p=0.016), grade 3 tumors (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.0-8.5, p=0.042), positive LVSI (OR 8.7, 95% CI 3.7-20.4, p<0.001) and lower uterine segment involvement (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.4-7.2, p=0.007) had more extrauterine metastases.ConclusionIn cases of apparent stage IA endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, staging surgeries should be considered in patients with larger, higher grade tumors, positive LVSI, or lower uterine segment involvement.