Dataset Information

Cardiac Imaging for the Assessment of Left Atrial Mechanics Across Heart Failure Stages.

ABSTRACT: The left atrium (LA) is emerging as a key element in the pathophysiology of several cardiac diseases due to having an active role in contrasting heart failure (HF) progression. Its morphological and functional remodeling occurs progressively according to pressure or volume overload generated by the underlying disease, and its ability of adaptation contributes to avoid pulmonary circulation congestion and to postpone HF symptoms. Moreover, early signs of LA dysfunction can anticipate and predict the clinical course of HF diseases before the symptom onset which, particularly, also applies to patients with increased risk of HF with still normal cardiac structure (stage A HF). The study of LA mechanics (chamber morphology and function) is moving from a research interest to a clinical application thanks to a great clinical, prognostic, and pathophysiological significance. This process is promoted by the technological progress of cardiac imaging which increases the availability of easy-to-use tools for clinicians and HF specialists. Two-dimensional (2D) speckle tracking echocardiography and feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance are becoming essential for daily practice. In this context, a deep understanding of LA mechanics, its prognostic significance, and the available approaches are essential to improve clinical practice. The present review will focus on LA mechanics, discussing atrial physiology and pathophysiology of main cardiac diseases across the HF stages with specific attention to the prognostic significance. Imaging techniques for LA mechanics assessment will be discussed with an overlook on the dynamic (under stress) evaluation of the chamber.

SUBMITTER: Bandera F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8792604 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundImpairment of left atrial (LA) function is linked to left ventricle (LV) mechanics in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In this study, we set forth to determine the difference in LA mechanics compared between HFpEF patients with different degrees of LV strains using the cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking technique.MethodsThis retrospective study enrolled 79 patients with prior heart failure event and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% (HFpEF group) together with 2:1 matched controls. LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and global radial strain (GRS); LA emptying fraction (LAEF); and, LA strains consisting of reservoir phase strain (LASr), conduit phase strain (LAScd), and contraction phase strain (LASct) were derived from cine images. All LA parameters were compared between HFpEF subgroups (lower and higher LV strain stratified by the median of each LV strain value) and controls.ResultsA total of 237 subjects were included. HFpEF had a lower LAEF and LA strain values compared with controls. The mean GLS value was significantly different between HFpEF and controls (- 13.3 ± 3.4% vs. - 15.4 ± 2.2%, p < 0.001). HFpEF with lower GLS (value ≥ - 13.1%) had significantly impaired LA mechanical parameters compared with both HFpEF with higher GLS and controls independent of potential confounders, as follows: LAEF (38.8 ± 16.6% vs. 48.6 ± 15.7% and 54.2 ± 12.2%), LASr (14.6 ± 7.1% vs. 24.3 ± 9.6% and 26.7 ± 8.8%), and LAScd (- 6.6 ± 3.9% vs. - 12.9 ± 6.0% and - 14.7 ± 7.4%) (post hoc analysis of variance p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Similarly, HFpEF with lower GCS (value ≥ - 16.6%) or lower GRS (value < 27.9%) also had significant impairment of LASr and LAScd compared with the higher strain group and controls. Abnormal LAEF (< 50%) and abnormal LASr (< 23%) are independently associated with NYHA class ≥ II (Odds ratio [OR] 3.894 [95% CI 2.202-6.885] p < 0.001, adjusted OR 3.382 [1.791-6.389] p < 0.001 for abnormal LAEF; and OR 2.613 [1.497-4.562] p = 0.001, adjusted OR 2.064 [1.118-2.110] p = 0.021 for abnormal LASr).ConclusionsPatients with HFpEF were found to have impaired LV and LA mechanics. Abnormal LA mechanics was highly prevalent in HFpEF patients with lower LV strain and significantly associated with the symptomatic status of the patients.

Project description:AimsIn a large proportion of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients, echocardiographic estimation of left atrial pressure (LAP) is not possible when the ratio of the peak early left ventricular filling velocity over the late filling velocity (E/A ratio) is not available, which may occur due to several potential causes. Left atrial reservoir strain (LASr) is correlated with LV filling pressures and may serve as an alternative parameter in these patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether LASr can be used to estimate LAP in HFrEF patients in whom E/A ratio is not available.Methods and resultsEchocardiograms of chronic HFrEF patients were analysed and LASr was assessed with speckle tracking echocardiography. LAP was estimated using the current ASE/EACVI algorithm. Patients were divided into those in whom LAP could be estimated using this algorithm (LAPe) and into those in whom this was not possible because E/A ratio was not available (LAPne). We assessed the prognostic value of LASr on the primary endpoint (PEP), which comprised the composite of hospitalization for the management of acute or worsened HF, left ventricular assist device implantation, cardiac transplantation, and cardiovascular death, whichever occurred first in time. We studied 153 patients with a mean age of 58 years of whom 76% men and 82% who were in NYHA class I-II. A total of 86 were in the LAPe group and 67 in the LAPne group. LASr was significantly lower in the LAPne group as compared with the LAPe group (15.8% vs. 23.8%, P < 0.001). PEP-free survival at a median follow-up of 2.5 years was 78% in LAPe versus 51% in LAPne patients. An increase in LASr was significantly associated with a reduced risk of the PEP in LAPne patients (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.91 per %, 95% confidence interval 0.84-0.98). An abnormal LASr (<18%) was associated with a five-fold increase in reaching the PEP.ConclusionsIn HFrEF patients in whom echocardiographic estimation of LAP is not possible due to due to unavailability of E/A ratio, assessing LASr potentially carries added clinical and prognostic value.

Project description:ObjectivesTo determine the test-retest reproducibility and observer variability of CMR-derived LA function, using (i) LA strain (LAS) and strain rate (LASR), and (ii) LA volumes (LAV) and emptying fraction (LAEF).MethodsSixty participants with and without cardiovascular disease (aortic stenosis (AS) (n = 16), type 2 diabetes (T2D) (n = 28), end-stage renal disease on haemodialysis (n = 10) and healthy volunteers (n = 6)) underwent two separate CMR scans 7-14 days apart. LAS and LASR, corresponding to LA reservoir, conduit and contractile booster-pump function, were assessed using Feature Tracking software (QStrain v2.0). LAEF was calculated using the biplane area length method (QMass v8.1). Both were assessed using 4- and 2-chamber long-axis standard steady-state free precession cine images, and average values were calculated. Intra- and inter-observer variabilities were assessed in 10 randomly selected participants.ResultsThe test-retest reproducibility was moderate to poor for all strain and strain rate parameters. Overall, strain and strain rate corresponding to reservoir phase (LAS_r, LASR_r) were the most reproducible, yielding the smallest coefficient of variance (CoV) (29.9% for LAS_r, 28.9% for LASR_r). The test-retest reproducibility for LAVs and LAEF was good: LAVmax CoV = 19.6% ICC = 0.89, LAVmin CoV = 27.0% ICC = 0.89 and total LAEF CoV = 15.6% ICC = 0.78. The inter- and intra-observer variabilities were good for all parameters except for conduit function.ConclusionThe test-retest reproducibility of LA strain and strain rate assessment by CMR utilising Feature Tracking is moderate to poor across disease states, whereas LA volume and emptying fraction are more reproducible on CMR. Further improvements in LA strain quantification are needed before widespread clinical application.Key points• LA strain and strain rate assessment using Feature Tracking on CMR has moderate to poor test-retest reproducibility across disease states. • The test-retest reproducibility for the biplane method of assessing LA function is better than strain assessment, with lower coefficient of variances and narrower limits of agreement on Bland-Altman plots. • Biplane LA volumetric measurement also has better intra- and inter-observer variability compared to strain assessment.

Dataset Information

Cardiac Imaging for the Assessment of Left Atrial Mechanics Across Heart Failure Stages.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets