Dataset Information

Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Vedolizumab in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease: Results From the VISIBLE 2 Randomised Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background and aims

To report results from VISIBLE 2, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial evaluating a new subcutaneous [SC] vedolizumab formulation as maintenance treatment in adults with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease [CD].

Methods

Following open-label vedolizumab 300 mg intravenous induction therapy at Weeks 0 and 2, Week 6 clinical responders (≥70-point decrease in CD Activity Index [CDAI] score from baseline) were randomised 2:1 to receive double-blind maintenance vedolizumab 108 mg SC or placebo every 2 weeks until Week 50. Assessments at Week 52 included clinical remission [primary endpoint; CDAI ≤150], enhanced clinical response [≥100-point decrease in CDAI from baseline], corticosteroid-free clinical remission among patients using a corticosteroid at baseline, clinical remission in anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF]-naïve patients, and safety.

Results

Following vedolizumab intravenous induction, 275 patients were randomised to vedolizumab SC and 135 to placebo maintenance. At Week 52, 48.0% of patients receiving vedolizumab SC versus 34.3% receiving placebo were in clinical remission [p = 0.008]. Enhanced clinical response at Week 52 was achieved by 52.0% versus 44.8% of patients receiving vedolizumab SC versus placebo, respectively [p = 0.167]. At Week 52, 45.3% and 18.2% of patients receiving vedolizumab SC and placebo, respectively, were in corticosteroid-free clinical remission, and 48.6% of anti-TNF-naïve patients receiving vedolizumab SC and 42.9% receiving placebo were in clinical remission. Injection site reaction was the only new safety finding observed for vedolizumab SC [2.9%].

Conclusions

Vedolizumab SC is an effective and safe maintenance therapy in patients with CD who responded to two infusions of vedolizumab intravenous induction therapy.

SUBMITTER: Vermeire S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8797168 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWhile indirect comparison of infliximab (IFX) and vedolizumab (VDZ) in adults with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) shows that IFX has better effectiveness during induction, and comparable efficacy during maintenance treatment, comparative data specific to subcutaneous (SC) IFX (i.e., CT-P13 SC) versus VDZ are limited.AimPooled analysis of randomised studies to compare efficacy and safety with IFX SC and VDZ in moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease.MethodsParallel-group, randomised studies evaluating IFX SC and VDZ in patients with moderate-to-severe CD or UC were identified. Eligible studies reported ≥ 1 prespecified outcome of interest at Week 6 (reflecting treatment during the induction phase) and/or at 1 year (Weeks 50-54; reflecting treatment during the maintenance phase). Prespecified efficacy and safety outcomes considered in this pooled analysis included the proportions of patients achieving disease-specific clinical responses, clinical remission, or discontinuing due to lack of efficacy, and the proportions of patients experiencing adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, infections, serious infections, or discontinuing due to AEs. Data from multiple studies or study arms were extracted and pooled using a random-effect model; comparative analyses were performed separately for patients with CD and UC.ResultsWe identified three eligible CD trials and four eligible UC trials that assigned over 1200 participants per disease cohort to either IFX SC or VDZ. In patients with CD, intravenous induction therapy with IFX demonstrated better efficacy (non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) compared with VDZ; during the maintenance phase, IFX SC showed numerically better efficacy (overlapping 95% CIs) than VDZ. A lower proportion of IFX SC-treated patients discontinued therapy due to lack of efficacy over 1 year. In patients with UC, efficacy profiles were similar with IFX SC and VDZ during the induction and maintenance phases, and a lower proportion of IFX SC-treated patients discontinued therapy due to lack of efficacy over 1 year. In both cohorts, safety profiles for IFX SC and VDZ were generally comparable during 1 year.ConclusionIFX SC demonstrated better efficacy than VDZ in patients with CD, and similar efficacy to VDZ in patients with UC; 1-year safety was comparable with IFX SC and VDZ.