Dataset Information

Radiotherapy in elderly patients with breast cancer: a literature review of acute and late toxicity

ABSTRACT: Radiotherapy (RT) induced toxicity in elderly patients is not well documented in the available literature due to the inhomogeneous and fragmentary data. Aim of this study was to review literature data on acute and late toxicity in elderly breast cancer patients treated with RT. The primary endpoint was RT-related acute and late toxicity in elderly breast cancer (BC) patients. The secondary endpoint was RT interruption rate in this patients’ population. All studies reporting RT-related acute and/or late toxicity in elderly women with breast cancer were included. All types of RT settings were included and no restriction was applied regarding other primary/adjuvant associated treatment. A bibliographic search was performed on PubMed. Only articles in English were considered while no chronological limitation was applied. Twenty-two studies were included in this analysis: 12 retrospective, 5 prospective observational trials, 1 phase III trial sub-analysis, and 4 phase I-II trials. Thirteen studies reported results about whole breast irradiation (WBI) delivered by external beams (EB) RT ± boost on the tumor bed. Nine studies reported results about accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) based on EB RT (2 studies), intraoperative RT (IORT: 2 studies), and brachytherapy (BRT: 2 studies); three studies compared different treatment techniques. Overall, reported acute grade (G) ≥3 toxicity ranged from 0.0% to 10.5% and late toxicity from 0.0% to 13.0%. RT discontinuation/interruption rates ranged between 0.0% and 2.0%. Acute G ≥3 toxicity rates were 2.0%, 6.7%, and 5.2% with EB-APBI, BRT, and IORT, respectively. Late G ≥3 toxicity with EB-APBI was 2.8%. No late G ≥3 toxicity was recorded in studies reporting on BRT and IORT. With WBI, the overall rates of G ≥3 toxicity were 3.0% (acute) and 1.8% (late). Higher toxicity rates were observed with weekly hypofractionation. None of the studies directly comparing age subgroups found age-related differences. Our findings suggest that RT of breast cancer is well tolerated even in elderly patients with toxicity rates comparable to those of the general population. Given these considerations, RT omission in elderly patients with breast cancer should be carefully evaluated limiting this option to very selected critical patients.

SUBMITTER: Zamagni A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8798880 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Radiation-induced normal-tissue toxicities are common, complex, and distressing side effects that affect 90% of patients receiving breast-cancer radiotherapy and 40% of patients post radiotherapy. In this study, the authors investigated the use of spectrophotometry and ultrasound to quantitatively measure radiation-induced skin discoloration and subcutaneous-tissue fibrosis. The study's purpose is to determine whether skin discoloration correlates with the development of fibrosis in breast-cancer radiotherapy.Eighteen breast-cancer patients were enrolled in our initial study. All patients were previously treated with a standard course of radiation, and the median follow-up time was 22 months. The treated and untreated breasts were scanned with a spectrophotometer and an ultrasound. Two spectrophotometer parameters-melanin and erythema indices-were used to quantitatively assess skin discoloration. Two ultrasound parameters-skin thickness and Pearson coefficient of the hypodermis-were used to quantitatively assess severity of fibrosis. These measurements were correlated with clinical assessments (RTOG late morbidity scores).Significant measurement differences between the treated and contralateral breasts were observed among all patients: 27.3% mean increase in skin thickness (p < 0.001), 34.1% mean decrease in Pearson coefficient (p < 0.001), 27.3% mean increase in melanin (p < 0.001), and 22.6% mean increase in erythema (p < 0.001). All parameters except skin thickness correlated with RTOG scores. A moderate correlation exists between melanin and erythema; however, spectrophotometer parameters do not correlate with ultrasound parameters.Spectrophotometry and quantitative ultrasound are objective tools that assess radiation-induced tissue injury. Spectrophotometer parameters did not correlate with those of quantitative ultrasound suggesting that skin discoloration cannot be used as a marker for subcutaneous fibrosis. These tools may prove useful for the reduction of radiation morbidities and improvement of patient quality of life.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Radiotherapy (RT) is of critical importance in the locoregional management of early breast cancer. Although RT is routinely used following breast conserving surgery (BCS), patients may occasionally be effectively treated with BCS alone. Currently, the selection of patients undergoing BCS who do not need breast irradiation is under investigation. With the advancement of personalized medicine, there is an increasing interest in reduction of aggressive treatments especially in older women. The primary objective of this study was to identify elderly patients who may forego breast irradiation after BCS without measurable consequences on local tumor growth and survival. METHODS:We analyzed 2384 early breast cancer patients aged 70 and older who were treated in 17 German certified breast cancer centers between 2001 and 2009. We compared RT versus no RT after guideline adherent (GA) BCS. The outcomes studied were breast cancer recurrence (RFS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Low-risk patients were defined by luminal A, tumor size T1 or T2 and node-negative whereas higher-risk patients were defined by patients with G3 or T3/T4 or node-positive or other than Luminal A tumors. To test if there is a difference between two or more survival curves, we used the Gp family of tests of Harrington and Fleming. RESULTS:The median age was 77 yrs (mean 77.6±5.6 y) and the median observation time 46 mths (mean 48.9±24.8 mths). 950 (39.8%) patients were low-risk and 1434 (60.2%) were higher-risk. 1298 (54.4%) patients received GA BCS of which 85.0% (1103) received GA-RT and only 15% (195) did not. For low-risk patients with GA-BCS there were no significant differences in RFS (log rank p = 0.651) and in BCSS (p = 0.573) stratified by GA-RT. 5 years RFS in both groups were > 97%. For higher-risk patients with GA-BCS we found a significant difference (p<0.001) in RFS and tumor-associated OS stratified by GA-RT. The results remain the same after adjusting by adjuvant systemic treatment (AST) and comorbidity (ASA and NYHA). CONCLUSIONS:Patients aged 70 years and older suffering from low-risk early breast cancer with GA-BCS can avoid breast irradiation with <3% chance of relapse. In the case of higher-risk, breast irradiation should be used routinely following GA-BCS. As a side effect of these results, removing the entire breast of elderly low risk patients to spare them from breast irradiation seems to be not necessary.

Project description:BackgroundLate intestinal toxicity after radiotherapy (LITAR) not only limits the radiation dose, which subsequently leads to unfavorable clinical outcomes, but also significantly lowers the quality of life in an increasing number of cancer survivors. Therefore, identifying clinical risk factors for LITAR is important for establishing a predictive model in the clinical setting of decision-making for these patients. This review aims to systematically summarize and clarify the clinical factors that can be potentially associated with an increased risk of moderate/severe LITAR in patients with abdominal or pelvic malignancies.Methods/designMEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Google Scholar and Chinese BioMed will be systematically searched to identify appropriate studies. Citations of the retrieved studies and recent reviews will also be searched separately by case.The enrolled studies should at least have the following information: (1) a clear definition and information on the LITAR severity; (2) assess clinical factors for moderate/severe toxicity with adjusted risk estimates; (3) have a cohort, case-control, randomized controlled trial and controlled clinical trial study design.Two authors will independently review the abstract and full text of retrieved studies, extract data from eligible studies and assess the risk of bias. Disagreements will be discussed among reviewers until a consensus is reached. The effect of identified risk factors will be displayed in forest plots. If the information is sufficient, results will be synthesized by a meta-analysis with the random effects model to pool the estimate of risk posed by clinical factors. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis will be used to explore the sources of heterogeneity.DiscussionThis review will summarize the evidence of clinical risk factors for moderate/severe LITAR. The results may help guide decision-making and minimize the side effects of therapeutic modalities in the clinical setting.

Dataset Information

Radiotherapy in elderly patients with breast cancer: a literature review of acute and late toxicity

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets