Dataset Information

Identification of key protein-coding genes in lung adenocarcinomas based on bioinformatic analysis

ABSTRACT:

Background

Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers and the primary cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. The 5-year survival of lung cancer patients is lower than 15%. As a common subtype of lung cancer, lung adenocarcinoma still has a high morbidity and mortality, although many strategies have been made, such as surgical operation, chemotherapy, targeted therapy. The use of gene expression microarray has provided a feasible and effective approach for the study on lung cancer. However, the biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets of lung adenocarcinomas are still not completely identified. Our study is aimed to find biomarkers and therapeutic targets of lung adenocarcinomas by identifying the key protein-coding gene in lung adenocarcinomas by bioinformatical approaches.

Methods

We selected and obtained messenger RNA microarray datasets from Gene Expression Omnibus database to identify differentially expressed genes between lung adenocarcinomas and normal lung tissue. The differentially expressed genes were clarified by Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway, the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and statistical analyses. Subsequently, quantitative real-time PCR was used to verify the results of bioinformatic analysis.

Results

We obtained 1,264, 896 and 408 differentially expressed genes from GSE32863, GSE43458 and GSE63459, respectively. The 242 common differentially expressed genes in three datasets were related to cell adhesion molecules, ECM-receptor interaction, leukocyte transendothelial migration according to KEGG analysis. GO analysis showed that these common differentially expressed genes were enriched in tumor-related functions. ASPM, CCNB2, CDC20, CDC45, MELK, TOP2A and UBE2T and KIAA0101 have the strongest protein-protein interaction relationships based on protein-protein interaction networks. Survival analysis showed that these nine genes were closely related to the survival of lung adenocarcinomas. The further qRT-PCR assays indicated that seven key genes (ASPM, CCNB2, CDC20, CDC45, MELK, TOP2A and UBE2T) display differential profile between clinical lung adenocarcinoma specimens and their matched normal tissues.

Conclusions

ASPM, CCNB2, CDC20, CDC45, MELK, TOP2A and UBE2T may be key protein coding genes in lung adenocarcinoma, and deserve further study to verify their feasibility and effectiveness as biomarkers and therapeutic targets for lung adenocarcinomas.

SUBMITTER: Yao R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8799172 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Lung cancer is the world's most common malignancies and ranks first among all cancer-related deaths. Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most frequent histological type in lung cancer. Its pathogenesis has not yet been fully elucidated, so it is of great significance to explore related genes for elucidating the molecular mechanism involved in occurrence and development of LUAD.To explore the crucial genes associated with LUAD development and progression, microarray datasets GSE7670, GSE10072, and GSE31547 were acquired from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. R language Limma package was adopted to screen the differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The clusterProfiler package was used for enrichment analysis and annotation of the Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome (KEGG) pathways for DEGs. The Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes database (STRING) was used to construct the protein interaction network for DEGs, while Cytoscape was adopted to visualize it. The functional module was screened with Cytoscape's MCODE (The Molecular Complex Detection) plugin. The crucial genes associated with LUAD were identified by cytoHubba plugin. Kaplan-Meier plotter online tool was used to perform survival analysis of the hub gene.Three hundred twenty-one DEGs in total were screened, of which 105 were upregulated and 216 were downregulated. It was found that some GO terms and pathways (e.g., collagen trimer, extracellular structure organization, heparin binding, complement and coagulation cascades, malaria, protein digestion and absorption, and PPAR signaling pathway) were considerably enriched in DEGs. UBE2C, TOP2A, RRM2, CDC20, CCNB2, KIAA0101, BUB1B, TPX2, PRC1, and CDK1 were identified as crucial genes. Survival analysis showed that the overexpression of UBE2C, TOP2A, RRM2, CDC20, CCNB2, KIAA0101, BUB1B, TPX2, and PRC1 significantly reduced the overall survival of LUAD patients. One of the crucial genes: UBE2C was validated by immunohistochemistry to be upregulated in LUAD tissues.This study screened out potential biomarkers of LUAD, providing a theoretical basis for elucidating the pathogenesis and evaluating the prognosis of LUAD.

Project description:Background:Alcohol-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was reported to be diagnosed at a later stage, but the mechanism was unknown. This study aimed to identify special key genes (SKGs) during alcohol-related HCC development and progression. Methods:The mRNA data of 369 HCC patients and the clinical information were downloaded from the Cancer Genome Atlas project (TCGA). The 310 patients with certain HCC-related risk factors were included for analysis and divided into seven groups according to the risk factors. Survival analyses were applied for the HCC patients of different groups. The patients with hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus infection only were combined into the HCC-V group for further analysis. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the HCCs with alcohol consumption only (HCC-A) and HCC-V tumors were identified through limma package in R with cutoff criteria?log2 fold change (logFC)|>1.0 and p < 0.05. The DEGs between eight alcohol-related HCCs and their paired normal livers of GSE59259 from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) were identified through GEO2R (a built-in tool in GEO database) with cutoff criteria |logFC|> 2.0 and adj.p < 0.05. The intersection of the two sets of DEGs was considered SKGs which were then investigated for their specificity through comparisons between HCC-A and other four HCC groups. The SKGs were analyzed for their correlations with HCC-A stage and grade and their prognostic power for HCC-A patients. The expressional differences of the SKGs in the HCCs in whole were also investigated through Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA). The SKGs in HCC were validated through Oncomine database analysis. Results:Pathological stage is an independent prognostic factor for HCC patients. HCC-A patients were diagnosed later than HCC patients with other risk factors. Ten SKGs were identified and nine of them were confirmed for their differences in paired samples of HCC-A patients. Three (SLC22A10, CD5L, and UROC1) and four (SLC22A10, UROC1, CSAG3, and CSMD1) confirmed genes were correlated with HCC-A stage and grade, respectively. SPP2 had a lower trend in HCC-A tumors and was negatively correlated with HCC-A stage and grade. The SKGs each was differentially expressed between HCC-A and at least one of other HCC groups. CD5L was identified to be favorable prognostic factor for overall survival while CSMD1 unfavorable prognostic factor for disease-free survival for HCC-A patients and HCC patients in whole. Through Oncomine database, the dysregulations of the SKGs in HCC and their clinical significance were confirmed. Conclusion:The poor prognosis of HCC-A patients might be due to their later diagnosis. The SKGs, especially the four stage-correlated genes (CD5L, SLC22A10, UROC1, and SPP2) might play important roles in HCC development, especially alcohol-related HCC development and progression. CD5L might be useful for overall survival and CSMD1 for disease-free survival predication in HCC, especially alcohol-related HCC.

Project description:Background: The molecular mechanism of tumorigenesis remains to be fully understood in breast cancer. It is urgently required to identify genes that are associated with breast cancer development and prognosis and to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms. In the present study, we aimed to identify potential pathogenic and prognostic differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in breast adenocarcinoma through bioinformatic analysis of public datasets. Methods: Four datasets (GSE21422, GSE29431, GSE42568, and GSE61304) from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset were used for the bioinformatic analysis. DEGs were identified using LIMMA Package of R. The GO (Gene Ontology) and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) analyses were conducted through FunRich. The protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of the DEGs was established through STRING (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes database) website, visualized by Cytoscape and further analyzed by Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE). UALCAN and Kaplan-Meier (KM) plotter were employed to analyze the expression levels and prognostic values of hub genes. The expression levels of the hub genes were also validated in clinical samples from breast cancer patients. In addition, the gene-drug interaction network was constructed using Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD). Results: In total, 203 up-regulated and 118 down-regulated DEGs were identified. Mitotic cell cycle and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition pathway were the major enriched pathways for the up-regulated and down-regulated genes, respectively. The PPI network was constructed with 314 nodes and 1,810 interactions, and two significant modules are selected. The most significant enriched pathway in module 1 was the mitotic cell cycle. Moreover, six hub genes were selected and validated in clinical sample for further analysis owing to the high degree of connectivity, including CDK1, CCNA2, TOP2A, CCNB1, KIF11, and MELK, and they were all correlated to worse overall survival (OS) in breast cancer. Conclusion: These results revealed that mitotic cell cycle and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition pathway could be potential pathways accounting for the progression in breast cancer, and CDK1, CCNA2, TOP2A, CCNB1, KIF11, and MELK may be potential crucial genes. Further, it could be utilized as new biomarkers for prognosis and potential new targets for drug synthesis of breast cancer.