Dataset Information

Efficacy and Effect of Cabozantinib on Bone Metastases in Treatment-naive Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Cabozantinib is active in advanced prostate cancer with improvement on bone scans in men on phase II trials. This trial evaluated the efficacy and changes in bone lesions in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with cabozantinib.

Patients and methods

Eligible patients with mCRPC involving bone underwent biopsy of a bone lesion followed by cabozantinib starting at 60 mg daily and continuing until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary study endpoint was progression-free survival at 12 weeks. The bone lesion was rebiopsied at 6 weeks. Expression of CMET, phospho-CMET, and VEGFR2 was assayed by immunohistochemistry. Serum was obtained at baseline, and at 3, 6, and 12 weeks and assayed for bone remodeling markers.

Results

A total of 25 patients were enrolled: 22 were evaluable, and 3 were excluded before receiving cabozantinib. At 12 weeks, 17 (77%) of 22 patients had stable disease or better. The median time on treatment was 24 weeks (range, 3-112 weeks). The overall median progression-free survival was 43.7 weeks (95% confidence interval, 23.7-97.0 weeks). Eight (36%) of 22 patients had markedly reduced uptake on bone scan. Patients with significant response on bone scan had higher bone morphogenic protein-2 levels at baseline, stable N-telopeptides levels, increased vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 expression, and a trend towards increased phospho-CMET while on cabozantinib compared with patients with stable disease.

Conclusions

Cabozantinib is active in men with mCRPC, inducing significant changes on bone scan in one-third of patients with changes in markers of bone formation and the tumor microenvironment.

SUBMITTER: Smith DC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8802308 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Radiation therapy with radium-223 dichloride improves overall survival, reduces symptomatic skeletal events in Caucasian patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and bone metastases, and is well tolerated. We report here the results of the first efficacy and safety study of radium-223 dichloride in a Japanese population. METHODS:In this open-label, uncontrolled, non-randomized, phase I trial, radium-223 dichloride was given to Japanese patients with CRPC and ?2 bone metastases in 4-week cycles. The patients were divided into three cohorts, with cohort 1 and the expansion cohort receiving injections of radium-223 dichloride [55 kBq/kg body weight (BW)] every 4 weeks (Q4W) for up to six injections, and cohort 2 receiving an initial single radium-223 dichloride injection of 110 kBq/kg BW followed by up to five injections of 55 kBq/kg BW Q4W. Safety was determined via adverse event (AE) reporting, and biochemical bone markers were assessed for treatment efficacy. RESULTS:In total 19 patients received at least one dose of radium-223 dichloride and 18 patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) of which the most common were anemia, thrombocytopenia, and lymphocytopenia. Serious AEs were reported in three patients but none were drug-related. In the patients of cohort 1 + expansion cohort (55 kBq/kg BW Q4W treatment; n = 16), prostate-specific antigen levels remained stable or slightly increased while the bone alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level significantly decreased. The response rates of bone ALP (?30 and ?50% reductions) were 81.8 and 36.4% at week 12, and 81.3 and 50.0% at the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS:Radium-223 dichloride was well tolerated in these Japanese patients and, at a dose of 55 kBq/kg BW, efficacy on biomarkers was as expected. The outcomes in Japanese patients were consistent with those reported in other non-Japanese populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01565746.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Whole-body assessments of 18F-NaF positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) provide promising quantitative imaging biomarkers of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study investigated whether the distribution of metastases across anatomic regions is prognostic of progression-free survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS:Fifty-four mCRPC patients with osseous metastases received baseline NaF PET/CT. Patients received chemotherapy (n = 16) or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (n = 38). Semiautomated analysis using Quantitative Total Bone Imaging software extracted imaging metrics for the whole, axial, and appendicular skeleton as well as 11 skeletal regions. Five PET metrics were extracted for each region: number of lesions (NL), standardized maximum uptake value (SUVmax), average uptake (SUVmean), sum of uptake (SUVtotal), and diseased fraction of the skeleton (volume fraction). Progression included that discovered by clinical, biochemical, or radiographic means. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed between imaging metrics and progression-free survival, and were assessed according to their hazard ratios (HR) and concordance (C)-indices. RESULTS:The strongest univariate models of progression-free survival were pelvic NL and SUVmax with HR = 1.80 (NL: false discovery rate adjusted P = .001, SUVmax: adjusted P = .001). Three other region-specific metrics (axial NL: HR = 1.59, adjusted P = .02, axial SUVmax: HR = 1.61, adjusted P = .02, and skull SUVmax: HR = 1.58, adjusted P = .04) were found to be stronger prognosticators relative to their whole-body counterparts. Multivariate model including region-specific metrics (C-index = 0.727) outperformed that of whole-body metrics (C-index = 0.705). The best performance was obtained when region-specific and whole-body metrics were included (C-index = 0.742). CONCLUSION:Quantitative characterization of metastatic spread by anatomic location on NaF PET/CT enhances potential prognostication. Further study is warranted to optimize the prognostic and predictive value of NaF PET/CT in mCRPC patients.