Dataset Information

Deep learning-based image analysis for automated measurement of eyelid morphology before and after blepharoptosis surgery.

ABSTRACT:

Background and aim

Eyelid position and contour abnormality could lead to various diseases, such as blepharoptosis, which is a common eyelid disease. Accurate assessment of eyelid morphology is important in the management of blepharoptosis. We aimed to proposed a novel deep learning-based image analysis to automatically measure eyelid morphological properties before and after blepharoptosis surgery.

Methods

This study included 135 ptotic eyes of 103 patients who underwent blepharoptosis surgery. Facial photographs were taken preoperatively and postoperatively. Margin reflex distance (MRD) 1 and 2 of the operated eyes were manually measured by a senior surgeon. Multiple eyelid morphological parameters, such as MRD1, MRD2, upper eyelid length and corneal area, were automatically measured by our deep learning-based image analysis. Agreement between manual and automated measurements, as well as two repeated automated measurements of MRDs were analysed. Preoperative and postoperative eyelid morphological parameters were compared. Postoperative eyelid contour symmetry was evaluated using multiple mid-pupil lid distances (MPLDs).

Results

The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between manual and automated measurements of MRDs ranged from 0.934 to 0.971 (p < .001), and the bias ranged from 0.09 mm to 0.15 mm. The ICCs between two repeated automated measurements were up to 0.999 (p < .001), and the bias was no more than 0.002 mm. After surgery, MRD1 increased significantly from 0.31 ± 1.17 mm to 2.89 ± 1.06 mm, upper eyelid length from 19.94 ± 3.61 mm to 21.40 ± 2.40 mm, and corneal area from 52.72 ± 15.97 mm² to 76.31 ± 11.31mm² (all p < .001). Postoperative binocular MPLDs at different angles (from 0° to 180°) showed no significant differences in the patients.

Conclusion

This technique had high accuracy and repeatability for automatically measuring eyelid morphology, which allows objective assessment of blepharoptosis surgical outcomes. Using only patients' photographs, this technique has great potential in diagnosis and management of other eyelid-related diseases.

SUBMITTER: Lou L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8805858 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWe aimed to propose a deep learning-based approach to automatically measure eyelid morphology in patients with thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO).MethodsThis prospective study consecutively included 74 eyes of patients with TAO and 74 eyes of healthy volunteers visiting the ophthalmology department in a tertiary hospital. Patients diagnosed as TAO and healthy volunteers who were age- and gender-matched met the eligibility criteria for recruitment. Facial images were taken under the same light conditions. Comprehensive eyelid morphological parameters, such as palpebral fissure (PF) length, margin reflex distance (MRD), eyelid retraction distance, eyelid length, scleral area, and mid-pupil lid distance (MPLD), were automatically calculated using our deep learning-based analysis system. MRD1 and 2 were manually measured. Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were performed to assess the agreement between automatic and manual measurements of MRDs. The asymmetry of the eyelid contour was analyzed using the temporal: nasal ratio of the MPLD. All eyelid features were compared between TAO eyes and control eyes using the independent samples t-test.ResultsA strong agreement between automatic and manual measurement was indicated. Biases of MRDs in TAO eyes and control eyes ranged from -0.01 mm [95% limits of agreement (LoA): -0.64 to 0.63 mm] to 0.09 mm (LoA: -0.46 to 0.63 mm). ICCs ranged from 0.932 to 0.980 (P<0.001). Eyelid features were significantly different in TAO eyes and control eyes, including MRD1 (4.82±1.59 vs. 2.99±0.81 mm; P<0.001), MRD2 (5.89±1.16 vs. 5.47±0.73 mm; P=0.009), upper eyelid length (UEL) (27.73±4.49 vs. 25.42±4.35 mm; P=0.002), lower eyelid length (LEL) (31.51±4.59 vs. 26.34±4.72 mm; P<0.001), and total scleral area (SATOTAL) (96.14±34.38 vs. 56.91±14.97 mm2; P<0.001). The MPLDs at all angles showed significant differences in the 2 groups of eyes (P=0.008 at temporal 180°; P<0.001 at other angles). The greatest temporal-nasal asymmetry appeared at 75° apart from the midline in TAO eyes.ConclusionsOur proposed system allowed automatic, comprehensive, and objective measurement of eyelid morphology by only using facial images, which has potential application prospects in TAO. Future work with a large sample of patients that contains different TAO subsets is warranted.