Project description:INTRODUCTION:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard of care for patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, questions remain about the optimal treatment sequence of EGFR TKIs. The global, observational GioTag study demonstrated prolonged time on treatment with sequential afatinib and osimertinib therapy in patients who acquired the T790M mutation. Here, we assessed outcomes in patients who received the approved 40-mg starting dose of afatinib, as used in the clinical trial setting. METHODS:In the non-interventional, global, multicenter GioTag study, patients had T790M-positive disease following first-line afatinib and started osimertinib treatment ? 10 months prior to data entry. Primary outcome was time on treatment. This subanalysis assessed outcomes in patients who received afatinib 40 mg. RESULTS:In 169 patients who received an afatinib starting dose of 40 mg, median time on treatment was 27.6 months (90% confidence interval [CI] 26.3-31.3). Benefit was seen across patient subgroups, particularly those with Del19-positive disease and Asian patients; median time on treatment was 29.9 months (90% CI 27.6-46.7) in patients with Del19-positive disease and 46.7 months (90% CI 28.4-not reached) in Asian patients. The 2-year overall survival rate was 80%. CONCLUSIONS:These real-world results support the overall study results and demonstrate prolonged time on treatment with sequential afatinib and osimertinib. The results suggest that sequential afatinib and osimertinib is a feasible therapeutic strategy for patients who acquire the T790M mutation, particularly those with Del19-positive disease or Asian patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:NCT03370770.
Project description:BackgroundThe therapeutic landscape for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients that have common epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations has changed radically in the last decade. The availability of these treatment options has an economic impact, therefore a budget impact analysis was performed.MethodsA budget impact analysis was conducted from a Dutch healthcare perspective over a 5-year time horizon in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients receiving first-line afatinib (Gilotrif®) versus first-line osimertinib (Tagrisso®), followed by subsequent treatments. A decision analysis model was constructed in Excel. Scenario analyses and one-way sensitivity analysis were used to test the models' robustness.ResultsSequential treatment with afatinib versus first-line treatment with osimertinib showed mean total time on treatment (ToT) of 29.1 months versus 24.7 months, quality-adjusted life months (QALMs) of 20.2 versus 17.4 with mean cost of €108,166 per patient versus €143,251 per patient, respectively. The 5-year total budget impact was €110.4 million for the afatinib sequence versus €158.6 million for the osimertinib sequence, leading to total incremental cost savings of €48.15 million.ConclusionsFirst-line afatinib treatment in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC had a lower financial impact on the Dutch healthcare budget with a higher mean ToT and QALM compared to osimertinib sequential treatment.
Project description:Osimertinib is an effective third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved in multiple countries and regions for patients with EGFR T790M mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite impressive initial tumor responses, development of drug resistance ultimately limits the benefit of this compound. Mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib are just beginning to emerge, such as EGFR C797S and L718Q mutations, BRAF V600E and PIK3CA E545K mutations, as well as ERBB2 and MET amplification. However, a comprehensive view is still missing. In this study, we presented the first case of Chinese NSCLC patient who developed resistance to osimertinib, and discovered de novo EGFR G796D mutation as a potential mechanism. Our findings provided insights into mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib and highlighted tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution during the development of drug resistance.
Project description:The discovery of mutations in EGFR significantly changed the treatment paradigm of patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a particular group of patients with different clinical characteristics and outcome to EGFR-wild-type patients. In these patients, the treatment of choice as first-line therapy is first- or second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), such as gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib. Inevitably, after the initial response, all patients become refractory to these drugs. The most common mechanism of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs is the development of a second mutation in exon 20 of EGFR (T790M). Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR-TKI designed for overcoming T790M-mediated resistance. Based on the results of efficacy and tolerability of Phase II and Phase III studies, osimertinib has been approved for treatment of advanced EGFRT790M+ mutation NSCLC following progression on a prior EGFR-TKI. Occurrence of acquired resistance to osimertinib represents an urgent need for additional strategies including combination with other agents, such as other targeted therapies or checkpoint inhibitors, or development of new and more potent compounds.
Project description:ObjectivesThe optimal sequence for the administration of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of sequential afatinib and osimertinib treatment in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.Materials and methodsElectronic records of patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC, who were administered afatinib and osimertinib (group A) or other chemotherapy (group B) between October 2014 and 2019, across 16 hospitals in South Korea were reviewed. The primary outcome, time on treatment (TOT), secondary outcome, and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsOf the 737 patients who received frontline afatinib treatment, 324 with complete records were selected (group A: 126, group B: 198). All patients in group A were T790M positive after afatinib, while patients in group B were all negative or unknown. The median TOT was 35.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.7-45.6) in group A and 20.8 months (95% CI: 19.4-24.0) in group B. The median TOT with afatinib was 13.0 months (95% CI: 12.0-13.9) overall and 15.7 months (95% CI: 13.9-17.3) in group A. The 2- and 3-year survival rates were 86.0 and 69.3% in group A and 75.9 and 55.3% in group B, respectively.ConclusionSequential afatinib and osimertinib treatment resulted in better survival rates than treatment with afatinib followed by other chemotherapies.
Project description:PurposeThis study aimed to report the final analysis of time-on-treatment (TOT) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced-stage epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received sequential afatinib and osimertinib and to compare the outcomes with other second-line regimens (comparator group).Materials and methodsIn this updated report, the existing medical records were reviewed and rechecked. TOT and OS were updated and analyzed according to clinical features using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. TOT and OS were compared with those of the comparator group, in which most patients received pemetrexed-based treatments. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate features that could affect survival outcomes.ResultsThe median observation time was 31.0 months. The follow-up period was extended to 20 months. A total of 401 patients who received first-line afatinib were analyzed (166 with T790M+ and second-line osimertinib, and 235 with unproven T790M and other second-line agents). Median TOTs on afatinib and osimertinib were 15.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.0 to 16.1) and 11.9 months (95% CI, 8.9 to 14.6), respectively. The median OS in the osimertinib group was 54.3 months (95% CI, 46.7 to 61.9), much longer than that in the comparator group. In patients who received osimertinib, the OS was longest with Del19+ (median, 59.1; 95% CI, 48.7 to 69.5).ConclusionThis is one of the largest real-world studies reporting the encouraging activity of sequential afatinib and osimertinib in Asian patients with EGFR+ NSCLC who acquired the T790M mutation, particularly Del19+.
Project description:BackgroundThe optimal treatment sequencing for patients with metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a subject of debate. In the United States, osimertinib is the preferred EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in the first-line setting. However, small retrospective studies suggest that alternative EGFR TKI sequencing strategies may produce similar outcomes. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring an EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation treated with osimertinib vs. afatinib as first-line therapy.MethodsThis retrospective, single-institution study examined 86 patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with either afatinib (n=15) or osimertinib (n=71) in the first-line setting. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints included time on EGFR TKI, overall survival (OS), and the incidence of adverse events (AEs).ResultsThere was no difference in the PFS (median: 27.9 vs. 29.0 months, P=0.75), OS (P=0.18), and the median time on first-line EGFR TKI (23.9 vs. 15.2 months, P=0.10) between the afatinib and osimertinib groups, respectively. The number of AEs was also similar between the two treatment groups (P=0.17).ConclusionsIn this real-world retrospective study, there were no differences in PFS or OS between patients treated with afatinib or osimertinib in the first-line setting. These findings should be further investigated in larger prospective studies.
Project description:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) L718Q is a rare resistant mutation which independently leads to third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance. Although a few studies have examined its resistance mechanisms, no effective treatment strategy has yet been proposed for patients with this mutation. Here, we report an effective treatment strategy for the rare EGFR L718Q mutation for the first time. A 44-year-old Chinese male patient initially presented with the sensitizing EGFR L858R mutation, and the progression-free survival (PFS) time after initial icotinib treatment was 9 months. When the progression of the disease (PD) and the EGFR T790M mutation were identified, he did not respond to the osimertinib treatment. Through comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the surgical specimen, the rare EGFR L718Q mutation was eventually identified as having a frequency of 68.84%, together with an EGFR amplification with a copy number of 11.54. The previous treatment response was retrospectively explained, and the patient faced the challenge of not being able to benefit from any targeted therapy. Following chemotherapy with a personalized regimen which effectively modified the proportion of sensitive and resistant cells, significant response to osimertinib re-challenge was observed, and another PFS of 4.7 months was achieved. Unfortunately, four EGFR mutations, EGFR L858, T790M, L718Q, and C797S, were simultaneously detected in his late stage, and led to further progression of disease.
Project description:Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene have been identified as key oncogenic drivers of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Osimertinib (Tagrisso®) is an orally administered, third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that is widely approved for the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations. In the pivotal phase III FLAURA trial, osimertinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) relative to first-generation EGFR-TKIs in patients with previously untreated, EGFR mutation-positive, advanced NSCLC. Osimertinib also significantly prolonged central nervous system (CNS) PFS in patients with CNS metastases at trial entry. Osimertinib had a generally manageable tolerability profile; the majority of adverse events considered to be possibly related to treatment were of mild to moderate severity. Osimertinib represents a valuable targeted therapeutic for use in adults with previously untreated, EGFR mutation-positive, advanced NSCLC.
Project description:Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, shows significant benefit among patients with EGFR T790M mutation at disease progression. We analyzed the whole exome sequence of 48 samples obtained from 16 lung cancer patients with a longitudinal follow-up: treatment-naïve-baseline primary tumors positive for EGFR activating-mutations, paired re-biopsies upon disease progression but negative for EGFR T790M mutation based on qPCR, and their matched normal blood samples. Our Next generation sequencing (NGS) analysis identified an additional set of 25% re-biopsy samples to harbor EGFR T790M mutation occurring at a low-allele frequency of 5% or less, undetectable by conventional qPCR-based assays. Notably, the clinical utility of osimertinib among patients harboring low-allele frequency of EGFR T790M in tissue biopsy upon disease progression remains less explored. We established erlotinib-resistant PC-9R cells and twenty single-cell sub-clones from erlotinib-sensitive lung cancer PC-9 cells using in vitro drug-escalation protocol. NGS and allele-specific PCR confirmed the low-allele frequency of EGFR T790M present at 5% with a 100-fold higher resistance to erlotinib in the PC-9R cells and its sub-clones. Additionally, luciferase tagged PC-9, and PC-9R cells were orthotopically injected through the intercostal muscle into NOD-SCID mice. The orthotopic lung tumors formed were observed by non-invasive bioluminescence imaging. Consistent with in vitro data, osimertinib, but not erlotinib, caused tumor regression in mice injected with PC-9R cells, while both osimertinib and erlotinib inhibited tumors in mice injected with PC-9 cells. Taken together, our findings could extend the benefit of osimertinib treatment to patients with low EGFR T790M mutation allele frequency on disease progression.