Dataset Information

Differentiation between staple line granuloma and recurrence after sublobar resection for primary lung cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The use of sublobar resection for early-stage lung cancer or frail cases that cannot tolerate radical surgery for primary lung cancer has been increasing. This study aimed to identify the frequency, shape, and course of staple line thickening and granuloma formation after sublobar resection for primary lung cancer, and to identify factors that help distinguish them from recurrent cancer cases.

Methods

The medical records of 64 patients who underwent sublobar resection for primary lung cancer from January 2012 to December 2017 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Computed tomography (CT) images taken every 6 months for at least 3 years after surgery were reviewed, and the postoperative course was examined.

Results

Staple line thickening at the time of the first CT scan after surgery was observed in 43 cases (67.2%). Of them, linear thickening was seen in 31 cases (72.1%), and nodular thickening was seen in 12 cases (27.9%). Of these 43 cases, 25 cases were decreased, 8 cases were unchanged and 10 cases showed a tendency to progress during the follow-up period. Of the 64 cases, 7 (10.9%) had staple line recurrence. Staple line recurrence was significantly correlated with vascular invasion (P=0.015), surgical margin (P=0.013), nodular thickening (P<0.001) and a tendency to show progressive thickening (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Staple line thickening was observed in many cases of sublobar resection, and most of them were linear thickening. Staple line recurrence should be suspected if nodular thickening appears and shows a tendency to progress.

SUBMITTER: Matsuura N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8828522 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background Imaging examinations following sublobar resection of lung cancer often find thickened neoplasms around the resection margin. Identifying whether the neoplasms are postoperative recurrence or margin granulomas is vitally important. However, the identification mainly depends on the empirical judgment of the imaging department or clinicians in each clinical center at present, and there are few relevant studies, so it is hard to formulate a relatively unified standard. Therefore, we collected data from patients with thickened neoplasms around the resection margin after sublobar resection and sought to discover how to differentiate granulomas from tumor recurrence. Methods We examined the clinical records of 15 patients with neoplasms around the margins which identified as malignant in auxiliary examination reports, and received second surgery after first sublobar resection. We collected their postoperative pathology and auxiliary examination parameters. The univariate predictors helpful in distinguishing between recurrence and granuloma were analyzed as a diagnostic test. Results Of the 15 patients with neoplasms around the resection margin, six were diagnosed with benign granulomas, and nine were diagnosed with primary lung cancer recurrence. The results revealed that age, gender, specific surgical method, maximum standardized fluorodeoxyglucose uptake value (SUVmax), and follow-up time were not significantly different, but there were significant differences in enhanced computed tomography (CT) values in several analyses, which calculated by the hospital imaging system. The maximum CT values of the tumor recurrence and granuloma were 104.9±8.051 and 130.3±7.017 (P=0.045), the minimum CT values (15.67±5.113 vs. −17.17±4.826, P=0.0007) and in the floating range CT values (148.00±5.471 vs. 88.11±7.671, P<0.0001), respectively. Conclusions Differentiating between tumor recurrence and granulomas after sublobar resection remains difficult. However, examining the differences in enhanced CT allows the clinician to make an informed diagnosis that aids further investigation and treatment.

Project description:Background To investigate postoperative temporary consequences of the enrolled patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Patients and Methods We analyzed the clinical data of patients with lung adenocarcinoma admitted by the same surgical team of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) from July 2019 to December 2019. Statistical methods including propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to analyze the differences among them. Results A total of 108 patients were enrolled, including 50 patients with sublobar resection and 58 patients with lobectomy. Before PSM, there were statistically significant differences in age (p=0.015), hospitalization costs (p=0.042), lymphadenectomy (p=0.000), pathological staging (p=0.000), number of lymph nodes removed (p=0.000), number of positive lymph nodes (p=0.034), chest drainage duration (p=0.000), total chest drainage (p=0.000), length of postoperative hospital stays (p=0.000), postoperative D-dimer level (p=0.030) and perioperative lymphocyte margin (LM) (p=0.003) between sublobar resection and lobectomy. After PSM, there were statistical differences in number of lymph nodes removed (p=0.000), chest drainage duration (p=0.031) and total chest drainage (p=0.002) between sublobar resection and lobectomy. Whether with PSM analysis or not, there were no significant differences in other blood test results, such as inflammation indicators, postoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), albumin level, perioperative activity of daily living (ADL) scale scoring margin, complications, postoperative admission to intensive care unit (ICU) and readmission within 30 days. NLR was associated with total chest drainage (p=0.000), length of postoperative hospital stays (p=0.000), postoperative D-dimer level (p=0.050) and ADL scale scoring margin (p=0.003) between sublobar resection and lobectomy. Conclusion Sublobar resection, including wedge resection and segmentectomy, was as safe and feasible as lobectomy in our study, and they shared similar short-term outcomes. Postoperative NLR could be used to detect the clinical outcomes of patients. Secondary resectability of pulmonary function (SRPF) should be the main purpose of sublobar resection.

Project description:BackgroundThe increased detection of small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has renewed interest in sublobar resection in lieu of lobectomy.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter, noninferiority, phase 3 trial in which patients with NSCLC clinically staged as T1aN0 (tumor size, ≤2 cm) were randomly assigned to undergo sublobar resection or lobar resection after intraoperative confirmation of node-negative disease. The primary end point was disease-free survival, defined as the time between randomization and disease recurrence or death from any cause. Secondary end points were overall survival, locoregional and systemic recurrence, and pulmonary functions.ResultsFrom June 2007 through March 2017, a total of 697 patients were assigned to undergo sublobar resection (340 patients) or lobar resection (357 patients). After a median follow-up of 7 years, sublobar resection was noninferior to lobar resection for disease-free survival (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 1.01; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.24). In addition, overall survival after sublobar resection was similar to that after lobar resection (hazard ratio for death, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.26). The 5-year disease-free survival was 63.6% (95% CI, 57.9 to 68.8) after sublobar resection and 64.1% (95% CI, 58.5 to 69.0) after lobar resection. The 5-year overall survival was 80.3% (95% CI, 75.5 to 84.3) after sublobar resection and 78.9% (95% CI, 74.1 to 82.9) after lobar resection. No substantial difference was seen between the two groups in the incidence of locoregional or distant recurrence. At 6 months postoperatively, a between-group difference of 2 percentage points was measured in the median percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second, favoring the sublobar-resection group.ConclusionsIn patients with peripheral NSCLC with a tumor size of 2 cm or less and pathologically confirmed node-negative disease in the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes, sublobar resection was not inferior to lobectomy with respect to disease-free survival. Overall survival was similar with the two procedures. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; CALGB 140503 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00499330.).