Unknown

Dataset Information

0

The Impact of Surgical Practice on Oncological Outcomes in Robot-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer, Spanish National Registry.


ABSTRACT: This study aimed to assess whether surgical practice had a significant impact on oncological outcomes among women who underwent robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer (≤IB1 or IIA1, FIGO 2009). The secondary objective was to audit the pre-surgical quality indicators (QI) proposed by the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO). The top 5 of 10 centers in Spain and Portugal were included in the analysis. The hospitals were divided into group A (n = 118) and group B (n = 97), with recurrence rates of <10% and >10%, respectively. After balancing both groups using the propensity score, the ORs for all events were higher and statistically significant for group B (recurrences OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.13-1.15, p-value = 0.001; death OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.02-1.18, p-value = 0.012; disease-specific mortality ORr = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.04-1.19, p-value = 0.002). A higher surgical volume, higher participation in clinical trials, higher rate of MRI use for diagnosis, greater use of sentinel lymph node biopsies, and a favorable learning curve with low rates of early recurrences were observed among the centers with better oncological outcomes. These factors might have a significant impact on oncological outcomes not only after robot-assisted surgery, but also after laparoscopies and open surgeries in the treatment of cervical cancer.

SUBMITTER: Fernandez-Gonzalez S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8833333 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications


This study aimed to assess whether surgical practice had a significant impact on oncological outcomes among women who underwent robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer (≤IB1 or IIA1, FIGO 2009). The secondary objective was to audit the pre-surgical quality indicators (QI) proposed by the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO). The top 5 of 10 centers in Spain and Portugal were included in the analysis. The hospitals were divided into group A (<i>n</i> = 11  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10318649 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7699339 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7696424 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8432133 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9822966 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7767655 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7125366 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7497005 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10209308 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9045958 | biostudies-literature