Dataset Information

Prevalence of chronic cough in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Individual studies have indicated variable prevalence for chronic cough, but thus far, there has been no systematic report on the prevalence of this condition.

Methods

In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese biomedical literature service system, Wanfang Database, and VIP database, for studies on chronic cough in China published before December 28, 2020. A random effects model was used to calculate pooled prevalence estimates with 95% confidence interval [95%CI], weighted by study size.

Results

Fifteen studies with 141,114 community-based adults were included in the study, showing a prevalence of 6.22% (95% CI 5.03-7.41%). And 21 studies with 164,280 community-based children were included, presenting a prevalence of 7.67% (95% CI 6.24-9.11%). In subgroup meta-analyses, the prevalence in adults was 4.38% (95% CI 2.74-6.02%) in southern China and 8.70% (95% CI 6.52-10.88%) in northern China. In the children population, the prevalence in northern China was also higher than in southern China (northern vs. southern: 7.45% with a 95% CI of 5.50-9.41%, vs. 7.86% with a 95% CI of 5.56-10.16%).

Conclusions

Our population-based study provides relatively reliable data on the prevalence of chronic cough in China and may help the development of global strategies for chronic cough management.

SUBMITTER: Liang H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8840780 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prevalence of chronic cough in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liang Hanwen H Ye Weiyan W Wang Zhufeng Z Liang Jingyi J Yi Fang F Jiang Mei M Lai Kefang K

BMC pulmonary medicine 20220212 1

<h4>Background</h4>Individual studies have indicated variable prevalence for chronic cough, but thus far, there has been no systematic report on the prevalence of this condition.<h4>Methods</h4>In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese biomedical literature service system, Wanfang Database, and VIP database, for studies on chronic cough in China publ ...[more]

PMID: 35151307

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objectives: Chronic cough is a frequent condition worldwide that significantly impairs quality of life. Herbal medicine (HM) has been used to treat chronic cough due to the limited effectiveness of conventional medications. This study aimed to summarize and determine the effects of HM on patients with chronic cough. Methods: A comprehensive search of 11 databases was conducted to find randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) that reported the effects of HM for patients with chronic cough on 16 March 2023. The primary outcome was cough severity, and the secondary outcomes included cough-related quality of life, cough frequency, total effective rate (TER), and cough recurrence rate. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the certainty of the evidence for effect estimates was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations tool. Results: A total of 80 RCTs comprising 7,573 patients were included. When HM was used as an alternative therapy to conventional medication, there were inconsistent results in improving cough severity. However, HM significantly improved cough-related quality of life and TER and significantly lowered the cough recurrence rate compared with conventional medication. When used as an add-on therapy to conventional medication, HM significantly improved cough severity, cough-related quality of life, and TER and significantly lowered the recurrence rate. In addition, HM had a significantly lower incidence of adverse events when used as an add-on or alternative therapy to conventional medication. The subgroup analysis according to age and cause of cough also showed a statistically consistent correlation with the overall results. The certainty of the evidence for the effect of HM was generally moderate to low due to the risk of bias in the included studies. Conclusion: HM may improve cough severity and cough-related quality of life, and lower the cough recurrence rate and incidence of adverse events in patients with chronic cough. However, due to the high risk of bias and clinical heterogeneity of the included studies, further high-quality placebo-controlled clinical trials should be conducted using a validated and objective assessment tool. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023418736, CRD42023418736.

Project description:BackgroundCough is a relevant reason for encounter in primary care. For evidence-based decision making, general practitioners need setting-specific knowledge about prevalences, pre-test probabilities, and prognosis. Accordingly, we performed a systematic review of symptom-evaluating studies evaluating cough as reason for encounter in primary care.MethodsWe conducted a search in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Eligibility criteria and methodological quality were assessed independently by two reviewers. We extracted data on prevalence, aetiologies and prognosis, and estimated the variation across studies. If justifiable in terms of heterogeneity, we performed a meta-analysis.ResultsWe identified 21 eligible studies on prevalence, 12 on aetiology, and four on prognosis. Prevalence/incidence estimates were 3.8-4.2%/12.5% (Western primary care) and 10.3-13.8%/6.3-6.5% in Africa, Asia and South America. In Western countries the underlying diagnoses for acute cough or cough of all durations were respiratory tract infections (73-91.9%), influenza (6-15.2%), asthma (3.2-15%), laryngitis/tracheitis (3.6-9%), pneumonia (4.0-4.2%), COPD (0.5-3.3%), heart failure (0.3%), and suspected malignancy (0.2-1.8%). Median time for recovery was 9 to 11 days. Complete recovery was reported by 40.2- 67% of patients after two weeks, and by 79% after four weeks. About 21.1-35% of patients re-consulted; 0-1.3% of acute cough patients were hospitalized, none died. Evidence is missing concerning subacute and chronic cough.ConclusionPrevalences and incidences of cough are high and show regional variation. Acute cough, mainly caused by respiratory tract infections, is usually self-limiting (supporting a "wait-and-see" strategy). We have no setting-specific evidence to support current guideline recommendations concerning subacute or chronic cough in Western primary care. Our study presents epidemiological data under non non-pandemic conditions. It will be interesting to compare these data to future research results of the post-pandemic era.

Dataset Information

Prevalence of chronic cough in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Prevalence of chronic cough in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets