Dataset Information

Safety and efficacy of hetrombopag in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia: a single-arm, open-label, multi-center phase 1 study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) are promising therapeutic strategy for patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). We conducted this phase 1 trial (NCT02614846) to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and safety of hetrombopag (a TPO-RA) in patients with ITP.

Methods

Patients with ITP who had an insufficient response or had progressed on at least one standard treatment for ITP were given hetrombopag orally at an initial dose of 5 mg once daily for up to 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved platelet counts of ≥50×10⁹/L at week 6.

Results

A total of 37 eligible patients received hetrombopag treatment. This study met its primary endpoint, 22 (59.5%, 95% CI: 42.1-75.3) patients responded to hetrombopag, achieving platelet counts ≥50×10⁹/L at week 6. Of the 29 (78.4%, 95% CI: 61.8-90.2%) patients who responded at least once during the study, the median time from treatment initiation to first response was 2.1 weeks (95% CI: 1.3-4.1 weeks). The median accumulative response duration was 3.1 weeks [interquartile range (IQR), 2.1-4.1 weeks]. The incidence of bleeding was reduced with hetrombopag treatment compared to the baseline. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 32 (86.5%) patients and treatment-related AEs occurred in 13 (35.1%) patients. Two (5.4%) serious AEs were reported, but neither were treatment related. The dose was modified in one (2.7%) patient due to an AE. There were no incidences of treatment discontinuation/interruption or death.

Conclusions

Hetrombopag showed preliminary activity in elevating platelet counts and reducing bleeding in patients with chronic ITP who had received at least one standard therapy. It was well-tolerated.

SUBMITTER: Mei H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8848441 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Safety and efficacy of hetrombopag in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia: a single-arm, open-label, multi-center phase 1 study.

Mei Heng H Chen Xiequn X Zhou Jianfeng J Luo Jianmin J Shi Qingzhi Q Liu Jing J Wu Depei D Chen Guoan G Tai Yanfei Y Xiong Junye J Zou Jianjun J Hu Yu Y

Annals of translational medicine 20220101 2

<h4>Background</h4>Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) are promising therapeutic strategy for patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). We conducted this phase 1 trial (NCT02614846) to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and safety of hetrombopag (a TPO-RA) in patients with ITP.<h4>Methods</h4>Patients with ITP who had an insufficient response or had progressed on at least one standard treatment for ITP were given hetrombopag orally at an initial dose of 5 mg once daily for up to 6 weeks ...[more]

PMID: 35282136

Similar Datasets

Project description:Lessons learnedPatient compliance with the oral dosage treatment was good, with no need for hospitalization. Patients with tracheal and esophageal fistulas can take crushed apatinib by nutrient tube, with the same bioavailability and efficacy. Apatinib may be an effective and safe second- or further-line treatment for advanced esophageal cancer.BackgroundApatinib is an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR2), which is thought to play a role in esophageal cancer progression. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with unresectable esophageal cancer and to examine whether VEGFR2 expression influenced the clinical response.MethodsThis single-arm, open-label, investigator-initiated phase II study enrolled patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction who were admitted to Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital between August 2017 and January 2019. Apatinib monotherapy (500 mg/day) was given orally or via an enteral tube until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal, or death. Patients were followed until treatment was discontinued or death. The main endpoints were tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs).ResultsAmong 32 patients screened for inclusion, 30 were included in the safety and survival analyses (i.e., received apatinib), and 26 were included in the efficacy analysis (at least one imaging follow-up). Median follow-up time and exposure to apatinib were 5.34 months and 72 days, respectively. Among 26 patients included in the efficacy analysis, 2 had a partial response (PR; 7.7%) and 14 had stable disease (SD; 53.8%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 7.7%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 61.5%. Median PFS and OS were 4.63 months (95% confidence interval, 2.11-7.16 months) and 6.57 months (4.90 months to not estimable), respectively. Fifteen patients (50.0%) experienced treatment-related AEs, most commonly hypertension (26.7%), diarrhea (20.0%), and hand-foot-skin reaction (10.0%). No patients had grade ≥4 treatment-related AEs.ConclusionApatinib was effective as second- or further-line treatment for advanced esophageal cancer.

Project description:BackgroundCiprofol (HSK3486; Haisco Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China), developed as a novel 2,6-disubstituted phenol derivative showed similar tolerability and efficacy characteristics as propofol when applicated as continuous intravenous infusion for 12 h maintenance sedation in a previous phase 1 trial. The phase 2 trial was designed to investigate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic characteristics of ciprofol for sedation of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.MethodsIn this multicenter, open label, randomized, propofol positive-controlled, phase 2 trial, 39 Chinese intensive care unit patients receiving mechanical ventilation were enrolled and randomly assigned to a ciprofol or propofol group in a 2:1 ratio. The ciprofol infusion was started with a loading infusion of 0.1-0.2 mg/kg for 0.5-5.0 min, followed by an initial maintenance infusion rate of 0.30 mg·kg -1 ·h -1 , which could be adjusted to an infusion rate of 0.06 to 0.80 mg·kg -1 ·h -1 , whereas for propofol the loading infusion dose was 0.5-1.0 mg/kg for 0.5-5.0 min, followed by an initial maintenance infusion rate of 1.50 mg·kg -1 ·h -1 , which could be adjusted to 0.30-4.00 mg·kg -1 ·h -1 to achieve -2 to +1 Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale sedation within 6-24 h of drug administration.ResultsOf the 39 enrolled patients, 36 completed the trial. The median (min, max) of the average time to sedation compliance values for ciprofol and propofol were 60.0 (52.6, 60.0) min and 60.0 (55.2, 60.0) min, with median difference of 0.00 (95% confidence interval: 0.00, 0.00). In total, 29 (74.4%) patients comprising 18 (69.2%) in the ciprofol and 11 (84.6%) in the propofol group experienced 86 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs), the majority being of severity grade 1 or 2. Drug- and sedation-related TEAEs were hypotension (7.7% vs. 23.1%, P = 0.310) and sinus bradycardia (3.8% vs. 7.7%, P = 1.000) in the ciprofol and propofol groups, respectively. The plasma concentration-time curves for ciprofol and propofol were similar.Conclusionsciprofol is comparable to propofol with good tolerance and efficacy for sedation of Chinese intensive care unit patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the present study setting.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04147416.

Dataset Information

Safety and efficacy of hetrombopag in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia: a single-arm, open-label, multi-center phase 1 study.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Safety and efficacy of hetrombopag in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia: a single-arm, open-label, multi-center phase 1 study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets