Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Purpose
This study investigated the optimal cutoff points of three psychological tools for screening psychiatric disorders in women with high-risk pregnancy.Design and methods
In this cross-sectional study (N = 155), sensitivity/specificity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the Brief Symptom Inventory 53-items (BSI-53), and the BSI-18 were computed with respect to having a psychiatric diagnosis based on the clinical interview.Results
The usual cutoffs (≥13 for EPDS, T-score of 63 for BSI-53) demonstrated poor diagnostic accuracy. The optimal thresholds were computed for EPDS cutoff of 6.5, GSI = 0.47 for BSI-53, and GSI = 0.5 for BSI-18.Practice implications
The use of psychological tools among pregnant women with high-risk pregnancy may need to be modified in order to accurately identify psychiatric disorders.
SUBMITTER: Hamidia A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8855636 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Hamidia Angela A Kheirkhah Farzan F Chehrazi Mohammad M Basirat Zahra Z Ghadimi Reza R Barat Shahnaz S Cuijpers Pim P O'Connor Elizabeth E Mirtabar Seyyedeh Mahboubeh SM Faramarzi Mahbobeh M
Health science reports 20220218 2
<h4>Purpose</h4>This study investigated the optimal cutoff points of three psychological tools for screening psychiatric disorders in women with high-risk pregnancy.<h4>Design and methods</h4>In this cross-sectional study (N = 155), <b>s</b>ensitivity/specificity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the Brief Symptom Inventory 53-items (BSI-53), and the BSI-18 were computed with respect to having a psychiatric diagnosis based on the clinical interview.<h4>Results</h4>The usual cut ...[more]