Dataset Information

Two-Year Toxicity and Efficacy of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: A Single-Centered Study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

We aimed at determining the safety and feasibility of spot-scanning carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for patients with localized prostate cancer.

Methods

We enrolled 118 patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent treatment with spot-scanning CIRT at the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center (SPHIC) from January 2016 to December 2020. The dose was gradually increased from relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose (D_RBE) = 59.2-65.6 Gy in 16 fractions. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of acute and late toxicities, while the secondary endpoints were biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

The median follow-up time was 30.2 months (4.8-62.7 months). Acute grade 1 and 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicities were 15.3% and 18.6%, while acute grade 1 and 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were 2.5% and 0%, respectively. Late grade 1 and 2 GU toxicities were 4.2% and 1.7%, respectively. No late GI toxicity was observed. Moreover, there were no cases of severe acute or late toxicity (≥ grade 3). No significant association were observed between the factors and the acute GU toxicities, except for clinical target volume (CTV) (p = 0.031) on multivariate analysis. The 2-year bRFS, DMFS, PCSS, and OS were 100%, 100%, 100%, and 98.8%, respectively.

Conclusion

The 2-year outcomes were encouraging, providing additional and useful information on the feasibility and safety of spot-scanning CIRT for treating prostate cancer. Thus, we recommend long-term follow-up and prospective multicentered studies to reinforce the role of CIRT in the management of localized prostate cancer.

SUBMITTER: Li P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8881099 | biostudies-literature | 2021

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Two-Year Toxicity and Efficacy of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: A Single-Centered Study.

Li Ping P Hong Zhengshan Z Li Yongqiang Y Fu Shen S Zhang Qing Q

Frontiers in oncology 20220211

<h4>Background</h4>We aimed at determining the safety and feasibility of spot-scanning carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for patients with localized prostate cancer.<h4>Methods</h4>We enrolled 118 patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent treatment with spot-scanning CIRT at the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center (SPHIC) from January 2016 to December 2020. The dose was gradually increased from relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose (D<sub>RBE</sub>) = 59.2-65.6 Gy in 16 ...[more]

PMID: 35223457

Similar Datasets

Project description:To compare the efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant proton beam vs. carbon-ion beam radiotherapy for head and neck cancers after radical resection and to explore the value of particle beam radiotherapy (PBRT) in postoperative radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. Data from 38 head and neck cancer patients who received adjuvant PBRT after complete surgical resection at the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center (SPHIC) between October 2015 and March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. In total, 18 patients received adjuvant proton beam therapy (54-60 GyE/27-30 fractions) and 20 received adjuvant carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) (54-60 GyE/18-20 fractions). Survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Toxicity was evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects (version 4.03). With a median follow-up time of 21 (range, 3-45) months, the 2-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 93.3%, 87.4%, 94.1%, and 90.7%, respectively, for the entire cohort. The rates after proton beam therapy vs. CIRT were 94.1% vs. 91.7% (P=0.96), 88.1% vs. 86.2% (P=0.96), 94.4% vs. 93.3% (P=0.97), and 88.1% vs. 92.9% (P=0.57), respectively. Furthermore, 16 of the 18 (88.9%) patients developed acute grade I/II dermatitis (13 grade I; 3 grade II) after proton beam therapy, and only 7 of the 20 (35%) patients developed acute grade I dermatitis after CIRT (P=0.001). The incidence of acute grade I/II mucositis and xerostomia in proton and carbon ion cases were 45% vs. 55% (P=0.75) and 56% vs. 50% (P=0.87) respectively. Adjuvant proton beam therapy and CIRT after radical surgical resection for head and neck cancers provided satisfactory therapeutic effectiveness, but no significant difference was observed between the two radiotherapy technologies. However, adjuvant CIRT was associated with a more favorable acute toxicity profile as compared to proton beam therapy with significantly lower frequency and severity of acute dermatitis observed.

Project description:BackgroundCarbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) and proton beam therapy (PBT) are promising methods for prostate cancer, however, the consensus of an increasing number of studies has not been reached. We aimed to provide systematic evidence for evaluating the efficacy and safety of CIRT and PBT for prostate cancer by comparing photon radiotherapy.Materials and methodsWe searched for studies focusing on CIRT and PBT for prostate cancer in four online databases until July 2021. Two independent reviewers assessed the quality of included studies and used the GRADE approach to rate the quality of evidence. R 4.0.2 software was used to conduct the meta-analysis. A meta-regression test was performed based on the study design and tumor stage of each study.ResultsA total of 33 studies including 13 CIRT- and 20 PBT-related publications, involving 54,101, participants were included. The quality of the included studies was found to be either low or moderate quality. Random model single-arm meta-analysis showed that both the CIRT and PBT have favorable efficacy and safety, with similar 5-year overall survival (OS) (94 vs 92%), the incidence of grade 2 or greater acute genitourinary (AGU) toxicity (5 vs 13%), late genitourinary (LGU) toxicity (4 vs 5%), acute gastrointestinal (AGI) toxicity (1 vs 1%), and late gastrointestinal (LGI) toxicity (2 vs 4%). However, compared with CIRT and PBT, photon radiotherapy was associated with lower 5-year OS (72-73%) and a higher incidence of grade 2 or greater AGU (28-29%), LGU (13-14%), AGI (14-19%), and LGI toxicity (8-10%). The meta-analysis showed the 3-, 4-, and 5-year local control rate (LCR) of CIRT for prostate cancer was 98, 97, and 99%; the 3-, 4-, 5-, and 8-year biochemical relapse-free rate (BRF) was 92, 91, 89, and 79%. GRADE assessment results indicated that the certainty of the evidence was very low. Meta-regression results did not show a significant relationship based on the variables studied (P<0.05).ConclusionsCurrently available evidence demonstrated that the efficacy and safety of CIRT and PBT for prostate cancer were similar, and they may significantly improve the OS, LCR, and reduce the incidence of GU and GI toxicity compared with photon radiotherapy. However, the quantity and quality of the available evidence are insufficient. More high-quality controlled studies are needed in the future.

Dataset Information

Two-Year Toxicity and Efficacy of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: A Single-Centered Study.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Two-Year Toxicity and Efficacy of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: A Single-Centered Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets