Dataset Information

Differences in sexually transmitted infection risk comparing preexposure prophylaxis users and propensity score matched historical controls in a clinic setting.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine whether MSM using preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) are at a higher risk of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) than MSM not using PrEP.

Design

Secondary analysis of longitudinal STI data obtained from MSM attending an STD Clinic in Seattle, Washington, USA, October 2011-September 2017.

Methods

We identified patients obtaining PrEP through the STD Clinic, and used propensity score matching to select a historical group of similar patients not using PrEP for comparison. We linked patient data with STI surveillance data to compare the incidence of chlamydia, gonorrhoea and early syphilis, and time to first symptomatic STI among PrEP users and nonusers.

Results

Three hundred and sixty-five PrEP users who picked up prescriptions and returned for follow-up and 730 propensity score matched nonusers were included in the analysis. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) for chlamydia, gonorrhoea and early syphilis were 3.2 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.9-5.3], 2.8 (95% CI: 1.7-4.6) and 2.9 (95% CI: 1.5 - 5.6), respectively, comparing PrEP users to nonusers. Time to first symptomatic STI was shorter among PrEP users (120 days, 95% CI: 77 - 171) than among nonusers (185 days, 95% CI: 163-256).

Conclusion

Among MSM on PrEP, we observed a higher incidence of STIs and faster time to first symptomatic STI than MSM not using PrEP. PrEP may be a contributing factor in increasing STI rates among MSM.

SUBMITTER: Montano MA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8890685 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Differences in sexually transmitted infection risk comparing preexposure prophylaxis users and propensity score matched historical controls in a clinic setting.

Montaño Michalina A MA Dombrowski Julia C JC Dasgupta Sayan S Golden Matthew R MR Manhart Lisa E LE Barbee Lindley A LA Duerr Ann A Khosropour Christine M CM

AIDS (London, England) 20190901 11

<h4>Objective</h4>The aim of this study was to determine whether MSM using preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) are at a higher risk of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) than MSM not using PrEP.<h4>Design</h4>Secondary analysis of longitudinal STI data obtained from MSM attending an STD Clinic in Seattle, Washington, USA, October 2011-September 2017.<h4>Methods</h4>We identified patients obtaining PrEP through the STD Clinic, and used propensity score matching to select a historical gro ...[more]

PMID: 31149948

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceDoxycycline postexposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP) has been shown to decrease the incidence of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among people assigned male sex at birth in clinical trials, but data from clinical practice are limited.ObjectiveTo describe early uptake of doxyPEP and evaluate changes in STI incidence following doxyPEP initiation.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study of adults (aged ≥18 years) dispensed HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) at Kaiser Permanente Northern California during November 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023, examined electronic health record data to compare HIV PrEP users dispensed and not dispensed doxyPEP and rates of bacterial STIs before and after starting doxyPEP. Individuals were followed up from their first recorded STI test on or after November 1, 2020, until December 31, 2023, or discontinuation of health plan membership.ExposurePharmacy dispensing data were used to define doxyPEP recipients.Main outcomes and measuresDemographic and clinical characteristics were compared between individuals dispensed and not dispensed doxyPEP. Primary outcomes were incident chlamydia, gonorrhea, or infectious syphilis measured as quarterly STI positivity (proportion of individuals testing positive at least once per quarter). Among doxyPEP recipients, rate ratios (RRs) compared mean quarterly STI positivity from 24 months before to 12 months after starting doxyPEP. In an exploratory analysis, STI trends were evaluated for the full cohort, stratified by receipt of doxyPEP.ResultsAmong 11 551 HIV PrEP users (mean [SD] age, 39.9 [12.1] years; 95.1% male), 2253 (19.5%) were dispensed doxyPEP, of whom 2228 (98.9%) were male and 1096 (48.6%) had an STI in the year before starting doxyPEP. Compared with individuals not dispensed doxyPEP, doxyPEP recipients were older (mean [SD] age, 40.4 [10.8] vs 39.8 [12.4] years; P = .04) and had used HIV PrEP longer (mean [SD], 4.2 [2.8] vs 3.4 [2.6] years; P < .001), and a higher proportion were commercially insured (2091 [92.8%] vs 8270 [88.9%]; P < .001). Among doxyPEP recipients, quarterly chlamydia positivity decreased from 9.6% (95% CI, 9.0%-10.3%) before starting doxyPEP to 2.0% (95% CI, 1.5%-2.6%) after starting doxyPEP (RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.16-0.27; P < .001), with significant declines for each anatomic site of infection. Quarterly gonorrhea positivity decreased from 10.2% (95% CI, 9.6%-10.9%) before starting doxyPEP to 9.0% (95% CI, 8.0%-10.1%) after starting doxyPEP (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77-1.00; P = .048); site-specific declines were significant for rectal (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.97; P = .02) and urethral (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.40-0.79; P = .001) gonorrhea, but not pharyngeal gonorrhea. Quarterly syphilis positivity decreased from 1.7% (95% CI, 1.4%-1.9%) before starting doxyPEP to 0.3% (95% CI, 0.2%-0.6%) after starting doxyPEP (RR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.11-0.37; P < .001). Positivity for STIs remained stable in individuals not dispensed doxyPEP.Conclusions and relevanceThis study found that receipt of doxyPEP was associated with substantial declines in chlamydia and syphilis incidence and modest declines in urethral and rectal gonorrhea incidence among individuals using HIV PrEP. These findings suggest that doxyPEP may offer substantial benefits for reducing population-level STI transmission with broader implementation.

Project description:ImportanceEmerging evidence suggests that risk of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) increases among gay and bisexual men following initiation of HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).ObjectiveTo describe STI incidence and behavioral risk factors among a cohort of predominantly gay and bisexual men who use PrEP, and to explore changes in STI incidence following PrEP commencement.Design, setting, and participantsThe Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Expanded (PrEPX) Study, a multisite, open-label intervention study, was nested within the Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance (ACCESS) clinic network. A total of 4275 participants were enrolled (July 26, 2016-April 1, 2018) in Victoria, Australia. Of these, 2981 enrolled at 5 ACCESS clinics (3 primary care, 1 sexual health, and 1 community-based HIV rapid testing service), had at least 1 follow-up visit, and were monitored until April 30, 2018.ExposuresUpon enrollment, participants received daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumurate and emtricitabine for HIV PrEP, quarterly HIV and STI testing, and clinical monitoring.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was incidence of chlamydia, gonorrhea, or syphilis. Incidence rates and hazard ratios describing behavioral risk factors of STI diagnosis were calculated. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs), adjusted for change in testing frequency, described changes in STI incidence from 1-year preenrollment to study follow-up among participants with preenrollment testing data (n = 1378).ResultsAmong the 2981 individuals (median age, 34 years [interquartile range, 28-42]), 98.5% identified as gay or bisexual males, 29% used PrEP prior to enrollment, 89 (3%) withdrew and were censored at date of withdrawal, leaving 2892 (97.0%) enrolled at final follow-up. During a mean follow-up of 1.1 years (3185.0 person-years), 2928 STIs were diagnosed among 1427 (48%) participants (1434 chlamydia, 1242 gonorrhea, 252 syphilis). STI incidence was 91.9 per 100 person-years, with 736 participants (25%) accounting for 2237 (76%) of all STIs. Among 2058 participants with complete data for multivariable analysis, younger age, greater partner number, and group sex were associated with greater STI risk, but condom use was not. Among 1378 participants with preenrollment testing data, STI incidence increased from 69.5 per 100 person-years prior to enrollment to 98.4 per 100 person-years during follow-up (IRR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.29-1.56]). After adjusting for testing frequency, the increase in incidence from 1 year preenrollment to follow-up was significant for any STI (adjusted IRR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.02-1.23]) and for chlamydia (adjusted IRR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.04-1.33]).Conclusions and relevanceAmong gay and bisexual men using PrEP, STIs were highly concentrated among a subset, and receipt of PrEP after study enrollment was associated with an increased incidence of STIs compared with preenrollment. These findings highlight the importance of frequent STI testing among gay and bisexual men using PrEP.

Project description:IntroductionGiven the synergistic relationship between HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STI), the integration of services has the potential to reduce the incidence of both HIV and STIs. We explored the extent to which STI testing has been offered within HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) programmes worldwide.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of PrEP programmes implementing STI testing services in nine databases. We approached PrEP implementers for additional unpublished data and implementation details. Descriptive statistics were used to present the characteristics of STI testing within PrEP programmes. Content analysis of the input from PrEP implementers was conducted to summarize the barriers to and facilitators of STI testing.ResultsOf 9,161 citations, 91 studies conducted in 32 countries were included: 69% from high-income countries (HICs) and 64% from programmes targeting men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) only. The majority of programmes (70%, 64/91) conducted STI testing before the initiation of PrEP. The most common STIs tested were gonorrhoea (86%, 78/91), chlamydia (84%, 76/91) and syphilis (84%, 76/91). The majority provided STI testing at three-month intervals (70%, 53/76, for syphilis; 70% 53/78, for chlamydia; 68%, 53/78, for gonorrhoea). Relative to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), a higher proportion of PrEP programmes in HICs offered testing for gonorrhoea (92% vs. 71%, p < 0.05), chlamydia (92% vs. 64%, p < 0.01), syphilis (87% vs. 75%, p < 0.05), hepatitis A (18% vs. 4%, p < 0.05) and hepatitis C (43% vs. 21%, p < 0.05); offered testing for a higher number of STIs (mean 3.75 vs. 3.04, p < 0.05); and offered triple (throat, genital/urine and anorectal) anatomical site screening (54% vs. 18%, p < 0.001). Common implementation challenges included costs, access to STI diagnostics, programme logistics of integrating STI testing into PrEP delivery models and lack of capacity building for staff involved in PrEP provision.ConclusionsSignificant gaps and challenges remain in the provision of STI testing services within HIV PrEP programmes. We recommend more active integration of STI testing and management into PrEP programmes, supported by standardized practice guidelines, staff capacity building training and adequate funding. This could lead to improved sexual health and HIV outcomes in key populations.

Project description:BackgroundPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) reduces HIV acquisition risk by >90% and is a critical lever to reduce HIV incidence. Identifying individuals most likely to benefit from PrEP and retaining them on PrEP throughout HIV risk is critical to realize PrEP's prevention potential. Individuals with sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are an obvious priority PrEP population, but there are no data from sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) confirming the effectiveness of integrating PrEP into STI clinics. Assisted partner notification may further enhance STI clinic-based PrEP programming by recruiting PrEP users from the pool of named sexual partners of individuals presenting with an incident STI. However, the acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of these integrated and enhanced strategies are unknown.ObjectiveThis study aims to describe the implementation outcomes of acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness (regarding PrEP uptake and persistence) of integrating an enhanced PrEP implementation strategy into an STI clinic in Malawi.MethodsThe enhanced PrEP STI study is a prospective cohort study enrolling patients who are eligible for PrEP (aged ≥15 years) who are seeking STI services at a Lilongwe-based STI clinic. Data collection relies on a combination of in-depth interviews, patient and clinic staff surveys, and clinic record review. All enrolled PrEP users will be screened for acute HIV infection and receive quarterly testing for Neisseria gonorrhea, Chlamydia trachomatis, and syphilis. Participants will be asked to name recent sexual partners for assisted notification; returning partners will be screened for PrEP eligibility and, if interested, enrolled into the cohort of PrEP initiators. We will also enroll patients who are eligible for PrEP but choose not to initiate it, from the STI clinic. Patient participants will be followed for 6 months; we will assess self-reported PrEP use, PrEP refills, sexual behaviors, perceived HIV risk, and incident STIs. Clinic staff participants will be interviewed at baseline and at approximately 6 months and will complete surveys examining the perceived acceptability and feasibility of the integrated and enhanced PrEP strategy.ResultsEnrollment began in March 2022 and is projected to continue until February 2023, with patient participant follow-up through August 2023. The results of this study are expected to be reported in 2024.ConclusionsThis study will generate important evidence regarding the potential integration of PrEP services into STI clinics in SSA and preliminary data regarding the effectiveness of an enhanced intervention that includes assisted partner notification as a strategy to identify potential PrEP users. Furthermore, this trial will provide some of the first insights into STI incidence among PrEP users recruited from an STI clinic in SSA-critical data to inform the use of etiologic STI testing where syndromic management is the current standard. These findings will help to design future PrEP implementation strategies in SSA.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05307991; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05307991.International registered report identifier (irrid)DERR1-10.2196/37395.

Project description:ImportanceThere have been concerns that HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) may be associated with increases in sexually transmitted infections (STIs) because of subsequent reductions in condom use and/or increases in sexual partners.ObjectiveTo determine trends in STI test positivity among high-risk men who have sex with men (MSM) before and after the start of HIV PrEP.Design, setting, and participantsA before-after analysis was conducted using a subcohort of a single-group PrEP implementation study cohort in New South Wales, Australia (Expanded PreEP Implementation in Communities in New South Wales [EPIC-NSW]), from up to 1 year before enrollment if after January 1, 2015, and up to 2 years after enrollment and before December 31, 2018. STI testing data were extracted from a network of 54 sexual health clinics and 6 primary health care clinics Australia-wide, using software to deidentify, encrypt, and anonymously link participants between clinics. A cohort of MSM dispensed PrEP for the first time during the study, with 2 or more STI tests in the prior year and who tested during follow-up, were included from the EPIC-NSW cohort of HIV-negative participants with high-risk sexual behavior. Data analysis was performed from June to December 2019.ExposuresParticipants were dispensed coformulated tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (300 mg) and emtricitabine (200 mg) as HIV PrEP.Main outcomes and measuresThe main outcome was STI, measured using test positivity, defined as the proportion of participants testing positive for an STI at least once per quarter of follow-up. Outcomes were calculated for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoea by site of infection (anorectal, pharyngeal, urethral, or any) and for syphilis.ResultsOf the EPIC-NSW cohort of 9709 MSM, 2404 were included in the before-after analysis. The mean (SD) age of the participants was 36 (10.4) years, and 1192 (50%) were Australia-born. STI positivity was 52% in the year after PrEP (23.3% per quarter; 95% CI, 22.5%-24.2% per quarter) with no significant trend (mean rate ratio [RR] increase of 1.01 per quarter [95% CI, 0.99-1.02]; P = .29), compared with 50% positivity in the year prior to PrEP (20.0% per quarter [95% CI, 19.04%-20.95% per quarter]; RR for overall STI positivity, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.10-1.24]; P < .001), with an increase in quarterly STI positivity (mean RR of 1.08 per quarter, or an 8% increase per quarter [95% CI, 1.05-1.11]; P < .001; RR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.90-0.96]; P < .001). Findings were similar when stratified by specific STIs and anatomical site.Conclusions and relevanceSTI rates were high but stable among high-risk MSM while taking PrEP, compared with a high but increasing trend in STI positivity before commencing PrEP. These findings suggest the importance of considering trends in STIs when describing how PrEP use may be associated with STI incidence.

Dataset Information

Differences in sexually transmitted infection risk comparing preexposure prophylaxis users and propensity score matched historical controls in a clinic setting.

Objective

Design

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Differences in sexually transmitted infection risk comparing preexposure prophylaxis users and propensity score matched historical controls in a clinic setting.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets