Dataset Information

Local treatment options for young women with ductal carcinoma in situ: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing breast conserving surgery with or without adjuvant radiotherapy, and mastectomy.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Young age is associated with poor prognosis in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of female breast and controversy exists regarding the optimal treatment modality for young patients. We aimed to compare treatment outcomes among breast conserving surgery (BCS), BCS with adjuvant radiotherapy (BCS + RT), and total mastectomy (MT) for young DCIS women.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for studies reporting comparative results among BCS, BCS + RT, or MT in ≤50 years old (y/o) DCIS females. Study quality was assessed and meta-analysis with subgroup analysis was performed to pool the effect sizes of the outcomes-of-interest.

Results

We included 3 randomized control trials and 18 observational studies. For DCIS women ≤50 y/o, RT following BCS significantly reduced the risk for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) (HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.87). However, the benefit was less robust in extremely young patients and with long follow-ups. RT revealed no statistically significant preventive effect on ipsilateral invasive recurrence (HR = 1.38, 95% CI 0.98-1.94). On the other hand, MT yielded the lowest IBTR (BCS + RT vs MT: HR = 4.4, 95% CI 2.06-9.40), both in ipsilateral DCIS recurrence and ipsilateral invasive recurrence. There was great heterogeneity and could not reach an evident conclusion concerning survival outcomes.

Conclusion

This study highlighted the varying effect of RT for young DCIS females. The local control benefit of MT was definite without survival differences observed. Our study provided a moderate certainty of evidence to guide the treatment for young DCIS women. Further age-specific prospective trial is warranted.

SUBMITTER: Chien JC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8927828 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Local treatment options for young women with ductal carcinoma in situ: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing breast conserving surgery with or without adjuvant radiotherapy, and mastectomy.

Chien Ju-Chun JC Liu Wen-Shan WS Huang Wei-Tzu WT Shih Liang-Chung LC Liu Wen-Chung WC Chen Yu-Chia YC Chou Kang-Ju KJ Shiue Yow-Ling YL Lin Pei-Chin PC

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 20220312

<h4>Purpose</h4>Young age is associated with poor prognosis in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of female breast and controversy exists regarding the optimal treatment modality for young patients. We aimed to compare treatment outcomes among breast conserving surgery (BCS), BCS with adjuvant radiotherapy (BCS + RT), and total mastectomy (MT) for young DCIS women.<h4>Methods</h4>PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for studies reporting comparative results among BCS, BCS + RT, or MT in ≤50 y ...[more]

PMID: 35299032

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportancePatients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are treated with radiotherapy to reduce their risk of local invasive recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. However, the association of radiotherapy with breast cancer survival in patients with DCIS has not yet been clearly established.ObjectiveTo determine the extent to which radiotherapy is associated with reduced risk of breast cancer mortality in a large cohort of patients treated for DCIS, using a propensity score-based matching approach.Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study of women who had first primary DCIS diagnosed between 1998 and 2014 used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 registries database. Information on age and year of diagnosis, ethnicity, income, tumor size, tumor grade, estrogen receptor status, all treatments (surgery and radiation), and outcomes (invasive local recurrence and death from breast cancer) was abstracted for 140 366 women diagnosed with first primary DCIS. Three separate comparisons were performed using 1:1 matching: lumpectomy with radiation vs lumpectomy alone; lumpectomy alone vs mastectomy; and lumpectomy with radiation vs mastectomy.ExposuresUse of radiotherapy and/or extent of surgery.Main outcomes and measuresCrude and adjusted 15-year breast cancer-specific mortality.ResultsOf the 140 366 patients with DCIS in the cohort (109 712 [78.2%] white; mean [SD] age, 58.8 [12.3] years), 35 070 (25.0%) were treated with lumpectomy alone, 65 301 (46.5%) were treated with lumpectomy and radiotherapy, and 39 995 (28.5%) were treated with mastectomy. The actuarial 15-year breast cancer mortality rate was 2.33% for patients treated with lumpectomy alone, 1.74% for patients treated with lumpectomy and radiation, and 2.26% for patients treated with mastectomy. The adjusted hazard ratios for death were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.67-0.88) for lumpectomy and radiotherapy vs lumpectomy alone (29 465 propensity-matched pairs), 0.91 (95% CI, 0.78-1.05) for mastectomy alone vs lumpectomy alone (20 832 propensity-matched pairs), and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.65-0.87) for lumpectomy and radiotherapy vs mastectomy (29 865 propensity-matched pairs).Conclusions and relevanceIn patients with DCIS, treatment with lumpectomy and radiotherapy was associated with a significant reduction in breast cancer mortality compared with either lumpectomy alone or mastectomy alone. This suggests that the survival benefit of radiation is likely not due to local control, but rather to systemic effects.

Dataset Information

Local treatment options for young women with ductal carcinoma in situ: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing breast conserving surgery with or without adjuvant radiotherapy, and mastectomy.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Local treatment options for young women with ductal carcinoma in situ: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing breast conserving surgery with or without adjuvant radiotherapy, and mastectomy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets