IgA nephropathy in a pediatric patient after receiving the first dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Abdel-Qader DH
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8942577 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8256683 | biostudies-literature
Project description:On May 10, 2021, the Emergency Use Authorization of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (BNT162b2) was expanded to include adolescents (May 10, 2021. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-authorizes-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-emergency-use). We describe clinical characteristics of 8 adolescents who presented over the course of 36 days to Nicklaus Children's Hospital with perimyocarditis within 4 days of receiving a dose of BNT162b2 vaccine.
| S-EPMC8344528 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Purpose: To understand the single cell landscape of patients treated with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine
2021-06-25 | GSE171964 | GEO
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8608562 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8767873 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Immune thrombocytopenia is an autoimmune disease that can cause bleeding in severe cases. Although available published data do not associate the BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) with the risk of developing thrombocytopenia, the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine has raised concerns about its potential link with thrombosis and thrombocytopenia. We would like to clarify whether the BNT162b2 vaccine administration may interfere with pre-existing conditions and whether it may cause a risk of thrombocytopenia. Herein, we report three cases of post-vaccine thrombocytopenia among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA); one case in which a causal relationship cannot be ruled out with the BNT162b2 vaccine was officially announced. Furthermore, we reviewed reports of adverse events and death cases with a focus on thrombocytopenia and hemorrhages, following vaccination with BNT162b2 in Japan between February 17, 2021 and July 16, 2021, as reported by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare within the general population. The three cases in this report share the common features of old age, RA, chronic renal failure or hypertension, and pre-existing mild thrombocytopenia at baseline. A total of 746 death cases were reported during this time period, with death by bleeding accounting for 8.8% of the total deaths, of which 84.8% were cranial and statistically higher in young women than among elderly women. The risk-benefit ratio of the vaccine needs to be reconsidered based on high- and low-risk population types and ethnicity. To do so, the expansion of the pharmacovigilance system for BNT162b2 vaccination is urgently required worldwide.
| S-EPMC8514746 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionIn mid-February, the nationwide immunization plan for the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) started in Japan (at first primarily focused on health professionals) using an mRNA-based vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech). During the phase-in period from February to March, attention was focused on post-vaccination anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid symptoms from the viewpoint of ensuring the safety of the vaccination program.ObjectiveThe aim of this report was to provide an update on the status of anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid symptoms occurring after vaccination for COVID-19, as reported under the Adverse Event Following Immunization (AEFI) reporting system in Japan.MethodsThe Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) received AEFI reports from health professionals and manufacturers under the reporting system for AEFI after vaccination for COVID-19, which has been in operation since mid-February 2021. Reported AEFIs of anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid symptoms were assessed using the Brighton Collaboration Criteria to assess diagnostic certainty.Results1-month since Japan started the vaccination program for COVID-19 in February 2021, 578,835 doses have been administered to health professionals, with the PMDA receiving 181 suspected event reports of anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid symptoms. In 171 of these 181 cases, women developed these symptoms. Among 181 cases evaluated according to the Brighton Collaboration Criteria, 47 cases (26%) were classified as level 1-3 (reporting rate: 8.1/100,000 doses).ConclusionThe results appear similar to reported AEFIs in foreign studies of coronavirus vaccine administration to health professionals, although the reporting rate was higher. Further work is needed to examine the causal relationship of anaphylaxis reactions to coronavirus vaccine administration. Issues of multiple reporting and possible sex/age bias also remain to be analyzed.
| S-EPMC8335977 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIn mid-December 2020, Israel started a nationwide mass vaccination campaign against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In the first few weeks, medical personnel, elderly citizens, and patients with chronic diseases were prioritized. As such, patients with primary and secondary immunodeficiencies were encouraged to receive the vaccine. Although the efficacy of RNA-based COVID-19 vaccines has been demonstrated in the general population, little is known about their efficacy and safety in patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI).ObjectiveOur aim was to evaluate the humoral and cellular immune response to COVID-19 vaccine in a cohort of patients with IEI.MethodsA total of 26 adult patients were enrolled, and plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected from them 2 weeks following the second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Humoral response was evaluated by testing anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) receptor-binding domain and antinucleocapsid antibody titers and evaluating neutralizing ability by inhibition of receptor-binding domain-angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 binding. Cellular immune response was evaluated by using ELISpot, estimating IL-2 and IFN-γ secretion in response to pooled SARS-CoV-2 S- or M-peptides.ResultsOur cohort included 18 patients with a predominantly antibody deficiency, 2 with combined immunodeficiency, 3 with immune dysregulation, and 3 with other genetically defined diagnoses. Twenty-two of them were receiving immunoglobulin replacement therapy. Of the 26 patients, 18 developed specific antibody response, and 19 showed S-peptide-specific T-cell response. None of the patients reported significant adverse events.ConclusionVaccinating patients with IEI is safe, and most patients were able to develop vaccine-specific antibody response, S-protein-specific cellular response, or both.
| S-EPMC8168345 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine uses a novel messenger RNA technology to elicit a protective immune response. Short-term physiologic responses to the vaccine have not been studied using wearable devices.ObjectiveWe aim to characterize physiologic changes in response to COVID-19 vaccination in a small cohort of participants using a wearable device (WHOOP Strap 3.0). This is a proof of concept for using consumer-grade wearable devices to monitor response to COVID-19 vaccines.MethodsIn this prospective observational study, physiologic data from 19 internal medicine residents at a single institution that received both doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was collected using the WHOOP Strap 3.0. The primary outcomes were percent change from baseline in heart rate variability (HRV), resting heart rate (RHR), and respiratory rate (RR). Secondary outcomes were percent change from baseline in total, rapid eye movement, and deep sleep. Exploratory outcomes included local and systemic reactogenicity following each dose and prophylactic analgesic use.ResultsIn 19 individuals (mean age 28.8, SD 2.2 years; n=10, 53% female), HRV was decreased on day 1 following administration of the first vaccine dose (mean -13.44%, SD 13.62%) and second vaccine dose (mean -9.25%, SD 22.6%). RHR and RR showed no change from baseline after either vaccine dose. Sleep duration was increased up to 4 days post vaccination, after an initial decrease on day 1. Increased sleep duration prior to vaccination was associated with a greater change in HRV. Local and systemic reactogenicity was more severe after dose two.ConclusionsThis is the first observational study of the physiologic response to any of the novel COVID-19 vaccines as measured using wearable devices. Using this relatively small healthy cohort, we provide evidence that HRV decreases in response to both vaccine doses, with no significant changes in RHR or RR. Sleep duration initially decreased following each dose with a subsequent increase thereafter. Future studies with a larger sample size and comparison to other inflammatory and immune biomarkers such as antibody response will be needed to determine the true utility of this type of continuous wearable monitoring in regards to vaccine responses. Our data raises the possibility that increased sleep prior to vaccination may impact physiologic responses and may be a modifiable way to increase vaccine response. These results may inform future studies using wearables for monitoring vaccine responses.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04304703; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04304703.
| S-EPMC8341091 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine has been offered to nonallergic ≥16-year-old Israeli adults since December 19, 2020. Data regarding factors associated with vaccine ineffectiveness are limited. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of hepatic fibrosis on the efficacy of the BioNTech vaccine. Serum severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike immunoglobulins (S IgG) obtained at least 7 days following vaccination completion was correlated with the prevaccine calculated Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score among 719 employees in the Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem. Positive vaccine response (S IgG levels ≥ 19 AU/mL) was found in 708 of 719 individuals (98.5%). Vaccine failure (S IgG levels < 19) was found in 11 (1.5%); of these, 7 were immunosuppressed. Mean FIB-4 available in 501 of 708 vaccine responders was 1.13 ± 0.66, mean age 51.4 ± 12.4 years (29.3% males), and mean S IgG titers 239.7 ± 86.1 AU/mL. Similar to the general population, 70.5% had normal FIB-4 (<1.3), 26.8% undetermined FIB-4 (1.3-2.67), and 2.7% advanced FIB-4 (>2.67). When divided into response subgroups, 158 of 501 individuals (30.1%) with IgG titers 19-100 AU/mL had a mean FIB-4 of 1.48 ± 0.82; 198 (39.5%) with IgG titers 101-200 AU/mL had mean FIB-4 of 1.22 ± 0.76; 83 (16.6%) with titers 201-300 AU/mL had mean FIB-4 of 1.04 ± 0.48; 38 (7.6%) individuals with IgG titers 301-400 AU/ml had a mean FIB-4 of 1.08 ± 0.63; and 121 (24.2%) with IgG titers >400 AU/mL had mean FIB-4 of 1.18 ± 0.87. Increased FIB-4, age, and male gender significantly correlated with lower postvaccine IgG titers (P < 0.001). FIB-4 results were confirmed using FibroScan data displaying advanced fibrosis impact on weakened COVID-19 vaccine response. Conclusion: Immune suppression, older age, male gender, and advanced chronic liver disease are risk factors for lower vaccine response. The FIB-4 provides a simple tool to prioritize candidates for third-dose vaccine booster.
| S-EPMC9110948 | biostudies-literature