Dataset Information

Association Between Primary Care Practice Telehealth Use and Acute Care Visits for Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Conditions During COVID-19.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many primary care practices adopted telehealth in place of in-person care to preserve access to care for patients with acute and chronic conditions. The extent to which this change was associated with their rates of acute care visits (ie, emergency department visits and hospitalizations) for these conditions is unknown.

Objective

To examine whether a primary care practice's level of telehealth use is associated with a change in their rate of acute care visits for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSC visits).

Design, setting, and participants

This retrospective cohort analysis used a difference-in-differences study design to analyze insurance claims data from 4038 Michigan primary care practices from January 1, 2019, to September 30, 2020.

Exposures

Low, medium, or high tertile of practice-level telehealth use based on the rate of telehealth visits from March 1 to August 31, 2020, compared with prepandemic visit volumes.

Main outcomes and measures

Risk-adjusted ACSC visit rates before (June to September 2019) and after (June to September 2020) the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, reported as an annualized average marginal effect. The study examined overall, acute, and chronic ACSC visits separately and controlled for practice size, in-person visit volume, zip code-level attributes, and patient characteristics.

Results

A total of nearly 1.5 million beneficiaries (53% female; mean [SD] age, 40 [22] years) were attributed to 4038 primary care practices. Compared with 2019 visit volumes, median telehealth use was 0.4% for the low telehealth tertile, 14.7% for the medium telehealth tertile, and 39.0% for the high telehealth tertile. The number of ACSC visits decreased in all tertiles, with adjusted rates changing from 24.3 to 14.9 per 1000 patients per year (low), 23.9 to 15.3 per 1000 patients per year (medium), and 27.5 to 20.2 per 1000 patients per year (high). In difference-in-differences analysis, high telehealth use was associated with a higher ACSC visit rate (2.10 more visits per 1000 patients per year; 95% CI, 0.22-3.97) compared with low telehealth practices; practices in the middle tertile did not differ significantly from the low tertile. No difference was found in ACSC visits across tertiles when acute and chronic ACSC visits were examined separately.

Conclusions and relevance

In this cohort study that used a difference-in-differences analysis, the association between practice-level telehealth use and ACSC visits was mixed. High telehealth use was associated with a slightly higher overall ACSC visit rate than low telehealth practices. The association of telehealth with downstream care use should be closely monitored going forward.

SUBMITTER: Li KY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8972029 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Association Between Primary Care Practice Telehealth Use and Acute Care Visits for Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Conditions During COVID-19.

Li Kathleen Y KY Ng Sophia S Zhu Ziwei Z McCullough Jeffrey S JS Kocher Keith E KE Ellimoottil Chad C

JAMA network open 20220301 3

<h4>Importance</h4>During the COVID-19 pandemic, many primary care practices adopted telehealth in place of in-person care to preserve access to care for patients with acute and chronic conditions. The extent to which this change was associated with their rates of acute care visits (ie, emergency department visits and hospitalizations) for these conditions is unknown.<h4>Objective</h4>To examine whether a primary care practice's level of telehealth use is associated with a change in their rate o ...[more]

PMID: 35357448

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceThe rapid expansion of telehealth transformed how primary care practices deliver care; however, uncertainties about the quality of telehealth-delivered care compared with in-person care remain. While there are concerns that increased telehealth may introduce wasteful care, how telehealth affects the delivery of low-value care is unknown.ObjectiveTo examine whether a primary care practice's level of telehealth use is associated with changes in the rates of low-value care.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study using a difference-in-differences study design was conducted from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022, using Medicare fee-for-service claims data. Participants were Medicare beneficiaries attributed to primary care practices in Michigan.ExposuresLow, medium, or high tertile of practice-level telehealth use.Main outcomes and measuresLow-value care was assessed using 8 claims-based measures relevant to primary care, grouped into 4 main categories: office-based, laboratory-based, imaging-based, and mixed-modality services. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the association between practice-level telehealth use and rates of low-value care services, controlling for practice-level characteristics.ResultsA total of 577 928 beneficiaries (332 100 [57%] women; mean [SD] age, 76 [8] years) attributed to 2552 primary care practices were included in the study. After adjusting for practice-level characteristics and baseline differences in low-value care rates between telehealth use groups, high practice-level telehealth use was associated with lower rates of low-value cervical cancer screening (-2.9 [95% CI, -5.3 to -0.4] services per 1000 beneficiaries) and lower rates of low-value thyroid testing (-40 [95% CI, -70 to -9] tests per 1000 beneficiaries) compared with low practice-level telehealth use. Of the other 6 outcomes examined, there was no association between practice-level telehealth use and rates of low-value care services.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who received care from primary care practices in Michigan, some low-value care services (ie, cervical cancer screening among women older than 65 years and low-value thyroid testing) were lower among practices with high telehealth use, and there was no association between practice-level telehealth use in rates of most other low-value care services not delivered in the office. As telehealth continues to be an important part of care delivery, evaluating how it may encourage or discourage low-value care services is critical to understanding its impact on quality of care.

Project description:Many countries worldwide are aging rapidly, and the complex care needs of older adults generate an unprecedented demand for health services. Common reasons for elderly emergency department (ED) visits frequently involve conditions triggered by preventable infections also known as ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs). This study aims to describe the trend and the associated disease burden attributable to ACSC-related ED visits made by elderly patients and to characterize their ED use by nursing home residence. We designed a population-based ecological study using administrative data on Taiwan EDs between 2002 and 2013. A total of 563,647 ED visits from individuals aged 65 or over were examined. All elderly ED visits due to ACSCs (tuberculosis, upper respiratory infection, pneumonia, sepsis, cellulitis and urinary tract infection (UTI)) were further identified. Subsequent hospital admissions, related deaths after discharge, total health care costs and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were compared among different ACSCs. Prevalence of ACSCs was then assessed between nursing home (NH) residents and non-NH residents. Within the 12-year observation period, we find that there was a steady increase in both the rate of ACSC ED visits and the proportion of elderly with a visit. Overall, pneumonia is the most prevalent among six ACSCs for elderly ED visits (2.10%; 2.06 to 2.14), subsequent hospital admissions (5.77%; 5.59 to 5.94) and associated mortality following admission (17.37%; 16.74 to 18.01). UTI is the second prevalent ACSC consistently across ED visits (2.02%; 1.98 to 2.05), subsequent hospital admissions (2.36%, 2.25 to 2.48) and mortality following admission (10.80%; 10.28 to 11.32). Sepsis ranks third highest in the proportion of hospitalization following ED visit (2.29%; 2.18 to 2.41) and related deaths after hospital discharge (7.39%; 6.95 to 7.83), but it accounts for the highest average total health care expenditure (NT$94,595 ± 120,239; ≈US$3185.02) per case. When examining the likelihood of ACSC-attributable ED use, significantly higher odds were observed in NH residents as compared with non-NH residents for: pneumonia (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 5.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.50-5.58); UTI (aOR: 4.44, 95% CI 3.97-4.98); sepsis (aOR: 3.54, 95% CI 3.06-4.10); and tuberculosis (aOR: 2.44, 95% CI 1.63-3.65). Here we examined the ACSC-related ED care and found that, among the six ACSCs studied, pneumonia, UTI and sepsis were the leading causes of ED visits, subsequent hospital admissions, related mortality, health care costs and DALYs in Taiwanese NH elderly adults. Our findings suggest that efficient monitoring and reinforcing of quality of care in the residential and community setting might substantially reduce the number of preventable elderly ED visits and alleviate strain on the health care system.

Project description:Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic led to a major transition for patients from routine ambulatory-care-based in-person primary care visits to telehealth visits to manage chronic diseases. However, it remains unclear the extent to which individuals access telehealth services and whether such utilization varies along neighborhood characteristics, especially among racial minorities. This study aims to examine the association of outpatient telehealth utilization with sociodemographic, clinical, and neighborhood characteristics among adults with ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We included adults treated for an ACSC between March 5, 2020, and December 31, 2020, at a single ambulatory-care-based healthcare system, which serves a large population of low-income patients in the South region of the United States (i.e., Memphis, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area). Telehealth utilization was defined by outpatient procedural codes and providers’ notes on the type of visits. Generalized linear mixed models were used to examine the association of sociodemographic, clinical, and neighborhood factors with telehealth utilization in the overall cohort and the racial subpopulations. Results Among the 13,962 adults with ACSCs, 8583 (62.5%) used outpatient telehealth services. Patients who were older, female, with mental disorders, and who had more comorbidities had higher rates of telehealth services (p < .05). Controlling for covariates, we observed 75.2% and 23.1% increased use of telehealth services among Hispanics and other race groups, respectively, compared to Whites. Patients who commuted more than 30 minutes to health facilities were slightly less likely to use telehealth services [OR: 0.994 (0.991,0.998)]. Racial minorities (Blacks and Hispanics) with mental disorders were more likely to use telehealth service when compared to Whites. Discussion We found that among patients being treated for ACSCs, the use of telehealth services was highly prevalent in Hispanic patients in general and were more pronounced among both Hispanics and Black patients who have mental disorders.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSCs) are health conditions for which adequate management, treatment and interventions delivered in the ambulatory care setting could potentially prevent hospitalization. Which conditions are sensitive to ambulatory care varies according to the scope of health care services and the context in which the indicator is used. The need for a country-specific validated list for Portugal has already been identified, but currently no national list exists. The objective of this study was to develop a list of Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions for Portugal. METHODS:A modified web-based Delphi panel approach was designed, in order to determine which conditions can be considered ACSCs in the Portuguese adult population. The selected experts were general practitioners and internal medicine physicians identified by the most relevant Portuguese scientific societies. Experts were presented with previously identified ACSC and asked to select which could be accepted in the Portuguese context. They were also asked to identify other conditions they considered relevant. We estimated the number and cost of ACSC hospitalizations in 2017 in Portugal according to the identified conditions. RESULTS:After three rounds the experts agreed on 34 of the 45 initially proposed items. Fourteen new conditions were proposed and four achieved consensus, namely uterine cervical cancer, colorectal cancer, thromboembolic venous disease and voluntary termination of pregnancy. In 2017 133,427 hospitalizations were for ACSC (15.7% of all hospitalizations). This represents a rate of 1685 per 100,000 adults. The most frequent diagnosis were pneumonia, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/chronic bronchitis, urinary tract infection, colorectal cancer, hypertensive disease atrial fibrillation and complications of diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS:New ACSC were identified. It is expected that this list could be used henceforward by epidemiologic studies, health services research and for healthcare management purposes. ACSC lists should be updated frequently. Further research is necessary to increase the specificity of ACSC hospitalizations as an indicator of healthcare performance.

Project description:BackgroundTelehealth rapidly expanded since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to understand how telehealth can substitute in-person services by 1) estimating the changes in non-COVID emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and care costs among US Medicare beneficiaries by visit modality (telehealth vs. in-person) during the COVID-19 pandemic relative to the previous year; 2) comparing the follow-up time and patterns between telehealth and in-person care.MethodsA retrospective and longitudinal study design using US Medicare patients 65 years or older from an Accountable Care Organization (ACO). The study period was April-December 2020, and the baseline period was March 2019 - February 2020. The sample included 16,222 patients, 338,872 patient-month records and 134,375 outpatient encounters. Patients were categorized as non-users, telehealth only, in-person care only and users of both types. Outcomes included the number of unplanned events and costs per month at the patient level; number of days until the next visit and whether the next visit happened within 3-, 7-, 14- and 30-days at the encounter level. All analyses were adjusted for patient characteristics and seasonal trends.ResultsBeneficiaries who used only telehealth or in-person care had comparable baseline health conditions but were healthier than those who used both types of services. During the study period, the telehealth only group had significantly fewer ED visits/hospitalizations and lower Medicare payments than the baseline (ED 13.2, 95% CI [11.6, 14.7] vs. 24.6 per 1,000 patients per month and hospitalization 8.1 [6.7, 9.4] vs. 12.7); the in-person only group had significantly fewer ED visits (21.9 [20.3, 23.5] vs. 26.1) and lower Medicare payments, but not hospitalizations; the both-types group had significantly more hospitalizations (23.0 [21.4, 24.6] vs. 17.8). Telehealth was not significantly different from in-person encounters in number of days until the next visit (33.4 vs. 31.2 days) or the probabilities of 3- and 7-day follow-up visits (9.2 vs. 9.3% and 21.8 vs.23.5%).ConclusionsPatients and providers treated telehealth and in-person visits as substitutes and used either depending on medical needs and availability. Telehealth did not lead to sooner or more follow-up visits than in-person services.

Dataset Information

Association Between Primary Care Practice Telehealth Use and Acute Care Visits for Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Conditions During COVID-19.

Importance

Objective

Design, setting, and participants

Exposures

Main outcomes and measures

Results

Conclusions and relevance

Publications

Association Between Primary Care Practice Telehealth Use and Acute Care Visits for Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Conditions During COVID-19.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets