Dataset Information

Prognostic value of O ⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase methylation in isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant gliomas.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas have been associated with longer survival time than those that are IDH wild-type. Previous studies have shown the prognostic value of O ⁶ -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), which are predominantly IDH wild-type. Little is known of the prognostic value of MGMT methylation status for IDH mutant gliomas.

Methods

We retrospectively identified IDH mutant gliomas patients between 2011 and 2020 that were tested for MGMT promoter methylation. We generated Kaplan-Meier estimator curves and performed Cox proportional hazard models for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) to compare the outcomes of MGMT promoter methylated versus MGMT unmethylated patients.

Results

Of 419 IDH mutant gliomas with MGMT promoter methylation testing, we identified 54 GBMs, 223 astrocytomas, and 142 oligodendrogliomas. 62.3% patients had MGMT methylated tumors while 37.7% were MGMT unmethylated. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, median OS for all MGMT methylated patients was 17.7 years and 14.6 years for unmethylated patients. Median PFS for all MGMT methylated patients was 7.0 years and for unmethylated patients 5.2 years. After univariate subgroup analysis, MGMT methylation is only prognostic for OS and PFS in GBM, and for OS in anaplastic oligodendroglioma and anaplastic oligodendroglioma for OS. In multivariate analysis, MGMT unmethylated GBM patients carry a higher risk of death (HR 7.72, 95% CI 2.10-28.33) and recurrence (HR 3.85, 95% CI 1.35-10.96).

Conclusions

MGMT promoter methylation is associated with better OS and PFS for IDH mutant GBM. MGMT promoter methylation testing for other IDH mutant glioma subtypes may not provide additional information on prognostication.

SUBMITTER: Lam K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8982195 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jan-Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prognostic value of O 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase methylation in isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant gliomas.

Lam Keng K Eldred Blaine S C BSC Kevan Bryan B Pianka Sean S Eldred Brittany A BA Zapanta Rinonos Serendipity S Yong William H WH Liau Linda M LM Nghiemphu Phioanh L PL Cloughesy Timothy F TF Green Richard M RM Lai Albert A

Neuro-oncology advances 20220101 1

<h4>Background</h4>Patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas have been associated with longer survival time than those that are IDH wild-type. Previous studies have shown the prognostic value of O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), which are predominantly IDH wild-type. Little is known of the prognostic value of MGMT methylation status for ...[more]

PMID: 35386566

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Treatment of glioblastoma (GB), the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults, can include alkylating chemo-therapeutic agents. Two molecular biomarkers of treatment response are MGMT (O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase) promoter methylation and IDH (isocitrate dehydrogenase) mutations, which prevent repair of tumor cell DNA damage caused by alkylating chemotherapy. The status of MGMT promoter methylation and IDH mutation are associated with longer survival and a better response to chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE:Assess the prognostic value of MGMT methylation status and IDH mutation in adult Saudi glioblastoma patients. DESIGN:Retrospective, comparative survival analysis. SETTING:Tertiary care center. PATIENTS AND METHODS:The status of the MGMT promoter methylation and IDH mutation was assessed in adult patients diagnosed with GB between 2006 and 2019. A PCR-based assay was used to analyze for methylation of the MGMT promoter. A qualitative assay combining PCR clamping and amplification refractory mutation system technology was used to search for any of the 12 most common mutations in IDH1 and IDH2. Differences in survival were compared between those with and without MGMT promoter methylation and IDH mutation and between other subgroups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Survival of GB patients relative to MGMT promoter methylation and IDH mutation status. SAMPLE SIZE:146 patients (80 males and 66 females). RESULTS:Of 43 (29.5%) cases tested for MGMT promoter methylation, 14 (32.5%) were positive. Of 65 (44.5%) cases screened for IDH mutation, 6 cases (9.2%) tested positive. The 36-month survival rate was 47% for the MGMT methylated cohort compared to 27% for their unmethylated counterparts. The 18-month survival rate for the IDH-mutant was 75% compared to 48% for their IDH-wildtype counterparts. CONCLUSION:The findings confirm the positive impact of both MGMT promoter methylation and IDH mutation on the overall survival of Saudi GB patients. LIMITATIONS:Single institute study with relatively few tested cases. CONFLICT OF INTEREST:None.

Project description:Objectives To non-invasively predict the coexistence of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation in adult-type diffuse gliomas using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram and direct ADC measurements and compare the diagnostic performances of the two methods. Materials and methods A total of 118 patients with adult-type diffuse glioma who underwent preoperative brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) were included in this retrospective study. The patient group included 40 patients with coexisting IDH mutation and MGMT promoter methylation (IDHmut/MGMTmet) and 78 patients with other molecular status, including 32 patients with IDH wildtype and MGMT promoter methylation (IDHwt/MGMTmet), one patient with IDH mutation and unmethylated MGMT promoter (IDHmut/MGMTunmet), and 45 patients with IDH wildtype and unmethylated MGMT promoter (IDHwt/MGMTunmet). ADC histogram parameters of gliomas were extracted by delineating the region of interest (ROI) in solid components of tumors. The minimum and mean ADC of direct ADC measurements were calculated by placing three rounded or elliptic ROIs in solid components of gliomas. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic performances of the two methods. Results The 10th percentile, median, mean, root mean squared, 90th percentile, skewness, kurtosis, and minimum of ADC histogram analysis and minimum and mean ADC of direct measurements were significantly different between IDHmut/MGMTmet and the other glioma group (P < 0.001 to P = 0.003). In terms of single factors, 10th percentile of ADC histogram analysis had the best diagnostic efficiency (AUC = 0.860), followed by mean ADC obtained by direct measurements (AUC = 0.844). The logistic regression model combining ADC histogram parameters and direct measurements had the best diagnostic efficiency (AUC = 0.938), followed by the logistic regression model combining the ADC histogram parameters with statistically significant difference (AUC = 0.916) and the logistic regression model combining minimum ADC and mean ADC (AUC = 0.851). Conclusion Both ADC histogram analysis and direct measurements have potential value in predicting the coexistence of IDHmut and MGMTmet in adult-type diffuse glioma. The diagnostic performance of ADC histogram analysis was better than that of direct ADC measurements. The combination of the two methods showed the best diagnostic performance.

Project description:BackgroundThere has been no research investigating susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) radiomics features in evaluating molecular makers in gliomas. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of radiomics features extracted from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and SWI in determining World Health Organization (WHO) Grade, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation, and oxygen 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation in patients with diffuse gliomas.MethodsRetrospective MRI data of 539 patients from University of California San Francisco and Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital between January 2010 and December 2022 were analyzed in this study. The training, internal validation, and external test cohorts included 426 (median age 60 years, 168 female), 67 (median age 56 years, 31 female), and 46 (median age 55 years, 22 female) patients, respectively. A total of 7,896 radiomics features were extracted from structural MRI, ADC, and SWI within two regions of interest (ROIs). Feature selection was conducted using analysis of variance (ANOVA) F-test, and random forest was employed to establish predictive models. Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for assessing the statistical differences in patients' clinical characteristics. Delong test was performed to compare the areas under the curve (AUCs) of different radiomics models.ResultsFor WHO Grade task, the combined model of structural MRI, ADC, and SWI achieved the highest AUC of 0.951 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.886-1.000] on the external test cohort. For IDH mutation task, the structural MRI model achieved the highest AUC of 0.917 (95% CI: 0.801-1.000) on the external test cohort. For MGMT task, the combined model of structural MRI and ADC achieved the highest AUC of 0.650 (95% CI: 0.485-0.814) on the internal validation cohort.ConclusionsThe combined structural MRI, ADC, and SWI models achieved promising performance in assessing WHO Grade and IDH mutation status but showed no efficacy in predicting MGMT methylation status. Adding SWI and ADC features cannot provide extra information to structural MRI in predicting WHO grade and IDH mutation.

Project description:Prognostic factors and standards of care for astrocytoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant, CNS WHO grade 4, remain poorly defined. Here we sought to explore disease characteristics, prognostic markers, and outcome in patients with this newly defined tumor type. We determined molecular biomarkers and assembled clinical and outcome data in patients with IDH-mutant astrocytomas confirmed by central pathology review. Patients were identified in the German Glioma Network cohort study; additional cohorts of patients with CNS WHO grade 4 tumors were identified retrospectively at two sites. In total, 258 patients with IDH-mutant astrocytomas (114 CNS WHO grade 2, 73 CNS WHO grade 3, 71 CNS WHO grade 4) were studied. The median age at diagnosis was similar for all grades. Karnofsky performance status at diagnosis inversely correlated with CNS WHO grade (p < 0.001). Despite more intensive treatment upfront with higher grade, CNS WHO grade was strongly prognostic: median overall survival was not reached for grade 2 (median follow-up 10.4 years), 8.1 years (95% CI 5.4-10.8) for grade 3, and 4.7 years (95% CI 3.4-6.0) for grade 4. Among patients with CNS WHO grade 4 astrocytoma, median overall survival was 5.5 years (95% CI 4.3-6.7) without (n = 58) versus 1.8 years (95% CI 0-4.1) with (n = 12) homozygous CDKN2A deletion. Lower levels of global DNA methylation as detected by LINE-1 methylation analysis were strongly associated with CNS WHO grade 4 (p < 0.001) and poor outcome. MGMT promoter methylation status was not prognostic for overall survival. Histomolecular stratification based on CNS WHO grade, LINE-1 methylation level, and CDKN2A status revealed four subgroups of patients with significantly different outcomes. In conclusion, CNS WHO grade, global DNA methylation status, and CDKN2A homozygous deletion are prognostic in patients with IDH-mutant astrocytoma. Combination of these parameters allows for improved prediction of outcome. These data aid in designing upcoming trials using IDH inhibitors.