Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Candidacy for Cochlear Implantation in Prelingual Profoundly Deaf Adult Patients.


ABSTRACT: Cochlear implantation is usually not recommended for prelingual profoundly deaf adults, although some of these patients might benefit from it. This study aims to define the candidates for cochlear implantation in this population. This retrospective study reviewed 34 prelingual profoundly deaf patients who had received a cochlear implant at 32 ± 1.7 years old (16-55), with at least 1 year of follow-up. Speech perception and quality of life were assessed before and 3, 6, and 12 months after cochlear implantation, then every year thereafter. According to the word speech intelligibility in quiet (WSI) 1 year after implantation, two groups were identified: good performer (GP) with WSI ≥ 50% (n = 15), and poor performer (PP) with WSI ≤ 40% (n = 19). At the 1 year mark, mean WSI improved by 28 ± 4.6% (-20-100) (p < 0.0001). In GP, the intelligibility for words and sentences, communication and quality of life scales improved. In PP, the communication scale improved, but not auditory performance or quality of life. GP and PP differed pre-operatively in speech production, communication abilities, and WSI in best-aided conditions. In prelingual profoundly deaf adults, a dramatic auditory performance benefit could be expected after cochlear implantation if the patients have some degree of speech intelligibility in aided conditions and have developed oral communication and speech production.

SUBMITTER: Lahlou G 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8999851 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Candidacy for Cochlear Implantation in Prelingual Profoundly Deaf Adult Patients.

Lahlou Ghizlene G   Daoudi Hannah H   Ferrary Evelyne E   Jia Huan H   De Bergh Marion M   Nguyen Yann Y   Sterkers Olivier O   Mosnier Isabelle I  

Journal of clinical medicine 20220328 7


Cochlear implantation is usually not recommended for prelingual profoundly deaf adults, although some of these patients might benefit from it. This study aims to define the candidates for cochlear implantation in this population. This retrospective study reviewed 34 prelingual profoundly deaf patients who had received a cochlear implant at 32 ± 1.7 years old (16−55), with at least 1 year of follow-up. Speech perception and quality of life were assessed before and 3, 6, and 12 months after cochle  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7141989 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10587124 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10922682 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9174487 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7583607 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11558700 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9935678 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7037805 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4103851 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9487891 | biostudies-literature