Dataset Information

Evaluating Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening for Young African American Men With Cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Despite higher risks associated with prostate cancer, young African American men are poorly represented in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) trials, which limits proper evidence-based guidance. We evaluated the impact of PSA screening, alongside primary care provider utilization, on prostate cancer outcomes for these patients.

Methods

We identified African American men aged 40-55 years, diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2004 and 2017 within the Veterans Health Administration. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted propensity scores were used in multivariable models to assess PSA screening on PSA levels higher than 20, Gleason score of 8 or higher, and metastatic disease at diagnosis. Lead-time adjusted Fine-Gray regression evaluated PSA screening on prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), with noncancer death as competing events. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

Results

The cohort included 4726 patients. Mean age was 51.8 years, with 84-month median follow-up. There were 1057 (22.4%) with no PSA screening prior to diagnosis. Compared with no screening, PSA screening was associated with statistically significantly reduced odds of PSA levels higher than 20 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.49 to 0.63; P < .001), Gleason score of 8 or higher (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.69 to 0.88; P < .001), and metastatic disease at diagnosis (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.39 to 0.64; P < .001), and decreased PCSM (subdistribution hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.76; P < .001). Primary care provider visits displayed similar effects.

Conclusions

Among young African American men diagnosed with prostate cancer, PSA screening was associated with statistically significantly lower risk of PSA levels higher than 20, Gleason score of 8 or higher, and metastatic disease at diagnosis and statistically significantly reduced risk of PCSM. However, the retrospective design limits precise estimation of screening effects. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

SUBMITTER: Qiao EM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9002290 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluating Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening for Young African American Men With Cancer.

Qiao Edmund M EM Lynch Julie A JA Lee Kyung M KM Kotha Nikhil V NV Nalawade Vinit V Voora Rohith S RS Qian Alexander S AS Nelson Tyler J TJ Yamoah Kosj K Garraway Isla P IP Stewart Tyler F TF Parsons J Kellogg JK Rose Brent S BS

Journal of the National Cancer Institute 20220401 4

<h4>Background</h4>Despite higher risks associated with prostate cancer, young African American men are poorly represented in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) trials, which limits proper evidence-based guidance. We evaluated the impact of PSA screening, alongside primary care provider utilization, on prostate cancer outcomes for these patients.<h4>Methods</h4>We identified African American men aged 40-55 years, diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2004 and 2017 within the Veterans Health Admini ...[more]

PMID: 34893859

Similar Datasets

Project description:The incidence and mortality rates of prostate cancer are significantly higher in African-American men when compared to European-American men. We tested the hypothesis that differences in tumor biology contribute to this survival health disparity. Using microarray technology, we obtained gene expression profiles of primary prostate tumors resected from 33 African-American and 36 European-American patients. These tumors were matched on clinical parameters. We also evaluated 18 non-tumor prostate tissues from 7 African-American and 11 European-American patients. The resulting datasets were analyzed for expression differences on the gene and pathway level comparing African-American with European-American patients. Our analysis revealed a significant number of genes, e.g., 162 transcripts at a false-discovery rate less than 5%, to be differently expressed between African-American and European-American patients. Using a disease association analysis, we identified a common relationship of these transcripts with autoimmunity and inflammation. These findings were corroborated on the pathway level with numerous differently expressed genes clustering in immune response, stress response, cytokine signaling, and chemotaxis pathways. Furthermore, a two-gene tumor signature was identified that accurately differentiated between African-American and European-American patients. This finding was confirmed in a blinded analysis of a second sample set. In conclusion, the gene expression profiles of prostate tumors indicate prominent differences in tumor immunobiology between African-American and European-American men. The profiles portray the existence of a distinct tumor microenvironment in these two patient groups. Experiment Overall Design: A total of 69 fresh-frozen prostate tumors were obtained from the NCI Cooperative Prostate Cancer Tissue Resource (CPCTR) and the Department of Pathology at the University of Maryland (UMD). All tumors were resected adenocarcinomas that had not received any therapy prior to prostatectomy. The macro-dissected CPCTR tumor specimens (n = 59) were reviewed by a CPCTR-associated pathologist, who confirmed the presence of tumor in the specimens. These tissues were collected between 2002 and 2004 at four different sites, with each site providing tissues from both African-American and European-American patients. Information on race/ethnicity (33 African-Americans and 36 European-Americans) was either extracted from medical records (CPCTR) or obtained through an epidemiological questionnaire in which race/ethnicity was self-reported (UMD). Only one patient, a European-American, was also Hispanic. Surrounding non-tumor prostate tissue was collected from 18 of the recruited patients in this study. Of those, 7 were African-American men and 11 were European-American men. We also isolated total RNA from 10 needle biopsy specimens collected from patients at the National Naval Medical Center (one African-American and 9 European-Americans) that did not have prostate cancer. From those, we prepared two RNA pools, each representing 5 patients. Clinicopathological characteristics of the patients, including age at prostatectomy, histology, Gleason score, pathological stage, PSA at diagnosis, tumor size, extraprostatic extension, margin involvement, and seminal vesicle invasion were obtained from CPCTR. For UMD cases, this information was extracted from the medical and pathology records, if available. Written informed consent was obtained from all donors. Tissue collection and study design were approved by the institutional review boards of the participating institutions.

Project description:ImportanceContinuing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening after age 70 years might benefit men at high risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) or metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa), but the relative value of clinical factors (race and ethnicity, competing mortality, and PSA history) in identifying men at higher vs lower risk is unknown.ObjectiveTo examine the value of PSA levels, race and ethnicity, and competing mortality in risk stratification for PCSM and mPCa in men after age 70 years.Design, setting, and participantsIn this cohort study, clinical data of all men receiving health care through the Veterans Health Administration who turned age 70 years between 2008 and 2020 and had a normal screening PSA value between age 65 and 69 years (<4 ng/mL [baseline PSA]) and no prior history of prostate cancer or biopsy were examined. The data cutoff date was December 26, 2023.ExposureThe most recent screening PSA value from age 65 to 69 years, self-reported race and ethnicity, and competing mortality risk derived from a machine learning model.Main outcome and measuresThe 10-year absolute risk of PCSM and mPCa were determined using regression modeling.ResultsThe cohort included 921 609 men who turned 70 years between 2008 and 2020; 11% of whom self-reported as Black and 82% as White race. Between age 65 and 70 years, 45% of patients had a baseline PSA of less than 1.00 ng/mL, and 32% had a baseline PSA of 1.00 to 1.99 ng/mL. Most patients (87%) continued to undergo screening past age 70 years, with little variation by competing mortality risk or race and ethnicity. The 10-year cumulative incidence of PCSM was 0.26% overall, and 95% of men had a 10-year risk less than 0.73%. Higher baseline PSA level between age 65 and 69 years was associated with 10-year PCSM risk (0.79% for 3.00-3.99 ng/mL vs 0.10% for 0.20-0.99 ng/mL), race and ethnicity (0.36% for Black vs 0.25% for White), and competing mortality (0.24% for the highest quintile vs 0.21% for the lowest quintile). Similar results were found for mPCa. Low PSA (0.20-0.99 ng/mL) was associated with very low PCSM and mPCa risk, even among Black men in the healthiest quintile of competing mortality risk (10-year PCSM risk, 0.08% [95% CI, 0.01%-0.44%]; 10-year mPCa risk 0.24% [95% CI, 0.10%-0.52%]).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study, the findings suggest that most men receiving care through the VHA continue PSA screening after age 70 years despite low absolute 10-year PCSM risks. The PSA values from age 65 to 69 years may be highly informative for adverse prostate cancer outcomes after age 70 years, with a PSA less than 1 ng/mL associated with a very low risk of long-term PCSM and mPCa.

Dataset Information

Evaluating Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening for Young African American Men With Cancer.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Evaluating Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening for Young African American Men With Cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets