Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

17 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Doing the Right Thing? The Voting Power Effect and Institutional Shareholder Voting.

ABSTRACT: Through a combination of a controlled experiment and a survey, we examine the effect of voting power on shareholders' voting behavior at general meetings. To avoid a selection bias, common in archival voting data, we exogenously manipulate shareholders' power to affect the outcome. Our findings suggest that, when it comes to corporate decisions involving conflicts of interest, voting power nudges shareholders to oppose management and to choose the "right" alternative, that is, vote against a proposal which prima facie does not serve the company's best interest. This effect obtained even when the dissenting vote contravened the choices of all other voters. Furthermore, the drive "to do the right thing" was established as significant, above and beyond the size of the economic stake. We also demonstrate that strategic voting among institutional investors is contingent on voting power: when in a position to affect the outcome of a vote, institutional investors tend to eschew strategic considerations and display fewer consistent patterns in their voting, compared to situations in which their ability to make a difference is limited. In anticipation of a "bad" proposal to be put to vote at the general shareholder meeting, institutional investors prefer to negotiate terms with management beforehand, and vote against it only after such negotiations fail. Our results shed new light on the "behind the scenes" processes in shareholder voting and underscore the importance of institutional investor agency to corporate governance, accountability, and minority shareholder representation.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10551-022-05108-y.

SUBMITTER: Dressler E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9010709 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Mexico and the tobacco industry: doing the wrong thing for the right reason?

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC1363920 | biostudies-literature

The Trump Effect? Right-Wing Populism and Distrust in Voting by Mail in Canada.

Project description:Do Donald Trump's attacks on voting by mail influence how some Canadians view mail-in ballots? The Trump effect on views and behaviors surrounding voting by mail has been well documented in the United States. North of the border, more Canadians than ever voted by mail in the last general election. In this study, we consider how right-wing populism is associated with trust in voting by mail among Canadians. Specifically, we seek to test two main hypotheses. First, we consider whether Canadians holding populist views-and, in particular, those holding right-wing populist views (would-be Trump supporters)-are less trusting of voting by mail. Second, we consider whether political media exposure amplifies this association. We analyze data from both the 2021 Canadian Election Study and Democracy Checkup Survey. We find that those who hold populist views clearly have less trust in voting by mail. This is especially true among right-leaning individuals. Furthermore, as in the United States, this effect is moderated by one's level of political media exposure, with higher levels of political media exposure amplifying the effect of populist views on trust in voting by mail. Our findings, therefore, suggest that the politicization of mail-in voting by President Trump has important implications for the legitimacy of the electoral system not only in the United States, but also in Canada and potentially in other parts of the world.

| S-EPMC11300042 | biostudies-literature

Donor lung inflation: are we doing it right?

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC9562494 | biostudies-literature

Missing knowledge of gendered power relations among non-governmental organisations doing right to health work: a case study from South Africa.

Project description:BackgroundDespite 20 years of democracy, South Africa still suffers from profound health inequalities. Gender roles and norms are associated with individuals' vulnerability that lead to ill-health. For instance, gender inequality influences women's access to health care and women's agency to make health-related decisions. This paper explores gender-awareness and inclusivity in organisations that advocate for the right to health in South Africa, and analyses how this knowledge impacts their work?MethodsIn total, 10 in-depth interviews were conducted with members of The Learning Network for Health and Human Rights (LN), a network of universities and Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) which is explicitly committed to advancing the right to health, but not explicitly gendered in its orientation.ResultsThe results show that there is a discrepancy in knowledge around gender and gendered power relations between LN members. This discrepancy in understanding gendered power relations suggests that gender is 'rendered invisible' within the LN, which impacts the way the LN advocates for the right to health.ConclusionsEven organizations that work on health rights of women might be unaware of the possibility of gender invisibility within their organisational structures.

| S-EPMC6117970 | biostudies-literature

Issue framing in online voting advice applications: The effect of left-wing and right-wing headers on reported attitudes.

Project description:Voting Advice Applications (VAAs) provide voting recommendations to millions of people. As these voting recommendations are based on users' answers to attitude questions, the framing of these questions can have far-reaching consequences. The current study reports on a field experiment in which the framing of the header above VAA statements (N = 17) was manipulated (condition 1: no header; condition 2: a right-wing header, e.g., finance; condition 3: a left-wing header, e.g., nature and environment). Visitors of a VAA developed for Utrecht, the fourth largest municipality in the Netherlands, were randomly guided to one of the versions of the tool in which the header type was varied. Results (based on Nrespondents = 27,404) show that providing a header (left-wing or right-wing) leads to more left-wing answers as compared a condition where there is no header above the attitude statement. This effect, however, is only observed for respondents with lower levels of political sophistication.

| S-EPMC6383922 | biostudies-literature

Signaling through retinoic acid receptors in cardiac development: Doing the right things at the right times.

Project description:Retinoic acid (RA) is a terpenoid that is synthesized from vitamin A/retinol (ROL) and binds to the nuclear receptors retinoic acid receptor (RAR)/retinoid X receptor (RXR) to control multiple developmental processes in vertebrates. The available clinical and experimental data provide uncontested evidence for the pleiotropic roles of RA signaling in development of multiple embryonic structures and organs such eyes, central nervous system, gonads, lungs and heart. The development of any of these above-mentioned embryonic organ systems can be effectively utilized to showcase the many strategies utilized by RA signaling. However, it is very likely that the strategies employed to transfer RA signals during cardiac development comprise the majority of the relevant and sophisticated ways through which retinoid signals can be conveyed in a complex biological system. Here, we provide the reader with arguments indicating that RA signaling is exquisitely regulated according to specific phases of cardiac development and that RA signaling itself is one of the major regulators of the timing of cardiac morphogenesis and differentiation. We will focus on the role of signaling by RA receptors (RARs) in early phases of heart development. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Nuclear receptors in animal development.

| S-EPMC4349352 | biostudies-literature

The effect of shareholder litigation rights on female board representation: A quasi-natural experiment.

Project description:Employing as a quasi-natural experiment an unexpected judgment by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that raised the difficulty of shareholder litigation, we explore the effect of shareholder litigation rights on board gender diversity. Our difference-in-difference estimates show that an exogenous reduction in shareholder litigation risk results in significantly less female board representation, a decline by 11.44% in particular. Our findings corroborate the view that strong shareholder litigation rights strengthen internal governance such as board oversight. Therefore, when shareholder litigation rights are weakened, there is a drop in board quality. Additionally, we document a decline in board independence and an increase in board size following the Ninth Circuit ruling, both of which are associated with poorer board monitoring. Further analysis validates the results. i.e., propensity score matching, entropy balancing, GMM dynamic panel data estimation, and Oster's (2019) testing for coefficient stability. Based on a quasi-natural experiment, our conclusion probably reflects a causal influence, rather than a mere correlation.

| S-EPMC9491617 | biostudies-literature

Supporting a Comprehensive International Approach to Global Tuberculosis Eradication Is the Right Thing to Do.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7706164 | biostudies-literature

Policy-making power of opposition players: a comparative institutional perspective.

Project description:The organisation of legislative chambers and the consequences of parliamentary procedures have been among the most prominent research questions in legislative studies. Even though democratic elections not only lead to the formation of a government but also result in an opposition, the literature has mostly neglected oppositions and their role in legislative chambers. This paper proposes to fill this gap by looking at the legislative organisation from the perspective of opposition players. The paper focuses on the potential influence of opposition players in the policy-making process and presents data on more than 50 legislative chambers. The paper shows considerable variance of the formal power granted to opposition players. Furthermore, the degree of institutionalisation of opposition rights is connected to electoral systems and not necessarily correlated with other institutional characteristics such as regime type or the size of legislative chambers.

| S-EPMC8929392 | biostudies-literature

Release kinetics study of poorly water-soluble drugs from nanoparticles: are we doing it right?

Project description:In vitro drug release kinetics studies are routinely performed to examine the ability of new drug formulations to modulate drug release. The underlying assumption is that the studies are performed in a sufficiently dilute solution, where the drug release is not limited by the solubility and the difference in release kinetics profile reflects the performance of a drug carrier in vivo. This condition is, however, difficult to meet with poorly water-soluble drug formulations, as it requires a very large volume of release medium relative to the formulation mass, which makes it challenging to measure the drug concentration accurately. These difficulties are aggravated with nanoparticle (NP) formulations, which are hard to separate from the release medium and thus require a dialysis bag or repeated high-speed centrifugation for sampling. Perhaps for these reasons, drug release kinetics studies of NPs of poorly water-soluble drugs are often performed in suboptimal conditions in which the NPs are not sufficiently diluted. However, such a practice can potentially underestimate drug release from NPs, leading to an inaccurate prediction that the NPs will attenuate the drug activity in vivo. Here we perform release kinetics studies of two different NP formulations of paclitaxel, a representative poorly water-soluble drug, according to common practices in the literature. We find that the drug release from NPs can be substantially underestimated depending on the choice of the release medium, NP/medium ratio, and handling of release samples. We discuss potential consequences of underestimating drug release, ending with suggestions for future studies with NP formulations of poorly water-soluble drugs.

| S-EPMC4764376 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data