Dataset Information

Developments in the detection of diabetic retinopathy: a state-of-the-art review of computer-aided diagnosis and machine learning methods.

ABSTRACT: The exponential increase in the number of diabetics around the world has led to an equally large increase in the number of diabetic retinopathy (DR) cases which is one of the major complications caused by diabetes. Left unattended, DR worsens the vision and would lead to partial or complete blindness. As the number of diabetics continue to increase exponentially in the coming years, the number of qualified ophthalmologists need to increase in tandem in order to meet the demand for screening of the growing number of diabetic patients. This makes it pertinent to develop ways to automate the detection process of DR. A computer aided diagnosis system has the potential to significantly reduce the burden currently placed on the ophthalmologists. Hence, this review paper is presented with the aim of summarizing, classifying, and analyzing all the recent development on automated DR detection using fundus images from 2015 up to this date. Such work offers an unprecedentedly thorough review of all the recent works on DR, which will potentially increase the understanding of all the recent studies on automated DR detection, particularly on those that deploys machine learning algorithms. Firstly, in this paper, a comprehensive state-of-the-art review of the methods that have been introduced in the detection of DR is presented, with a focus on machine learning models such as convolutional neural networks (CNN) and artificial neural networks (ANN) and various hybrid models. Each AI will then be classified according to its type (e.g. CNN, ANN, SVM), its specific task(s) in performing DR detection. In particular, the models that deploy CNN will be further analyzed and classified according to some important properties of the respective CNN architectures of each model. A total of 150 research articles related to the aforementioned areas that were published in the recent 5 years have been utilized in this review to provide a comprehensive overview of the latest developments in the detection of DR.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10462-022-10185-6.

SUBMITTER: Selvachandran G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9038999 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTimely diagnosis of eye diseases is paramount to obtaining the best treatment outcomes. OCT and OCT angiography (OCTA) have several advantages that lend themselves to early detection of ocular pathology; furthermore, the techniques produce large, feature-rich data volumes. However, the full clinical potential of both OCT and OCTA is stymied when complex data acquired using the techniques must be manually processed. Here, we propose an automated diagnostic framework based on structural OCT and OCTA data volumes that could substantially support the clinical application of these technologies.DesignCross sectional study.ParticipantsFive hundred twenty-six OCT and OCTA volumes were scanned from the eyes of 91 healthy participants, 161 patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR), 95 patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and 108 patients with glaucoma.MethodsThe diagnosis framework was constructed based on semisequential 3-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural networks. The trained framework classifies combined structural OCT and OCTA scans as normal, DR, AMD, or glaucoma. Fivefold cross-validation was performed, with 60% of the data reserved for training, 20% for validation, and 20% for testing. The training, validation, and test data sets were independent, with no shared patients. For scans diagnosed as DR, AMD, or glaucoma, 3D class activation maps were generated to highlight subregions that were considered important by the framework for automated diagnosis.Main outcome measuresThe area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve and quadratic-weighted kappa were used to quantify the diagnostic performance of the framework.ResultsFor the diagnosis of DR, the framework achieved an AUC of 0.95 ± 0.01. For the diagnosis of AMD, the framework achieved an AUC of 0.98 ± 0.01. For the diagnosis of glaucoma, the framework achieved an AUC of 0.91 ± 0.02.ConclusionsDeep learning frameworks can provide reliable, sensitive, interpretable, and fully automated diagnosis of eye diseases.Financial disclosuresProprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Project description:Importance:The recent advances in the field of machine learning have raised expectations that computer-aided diagnosis will become the standard for the diagnosis of melanoma. Objective:To critically review the current literature and compare the diagnostic accuracy of computer-aided diagnosis with that of human experts. Data Sources:The MEDLINE, arXiv, and PubMed Central databases were searched to identify eligible studies published between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2018. Study Selection:Studies that reported on the accuracy of automated systems for melanoma were selected. Search terms included melanoma, diagnosis, detection, computer aided, and artificial intelligence. Data Extraction and Synthesis:Evaluation of the risk of bias was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool, and quality assessment was based on predefined criteria. Data were analyzed from February 1 to March 10, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures:Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity and summary receiver operating characteristic curves were the primary outcomes. Results:The literature search yielded 1694 potentially eligible studies, of which 132 were included and 70 offered sufficient information for a quantitative analysis. Most studies came from the field of computer science. Prospective clinical studies were rare. Combining the results for automated systems gave a melanoma sensitivity of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.66-0.80) and a specificity of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.88). Sensitivity was lower in studies that used independent test sets than in those that did not (0.51; 95% CI, 0.34-0.69 vs 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77-0.86; P?<?.001); however, the specificity was similar (0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.91 vs 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80-0.88; P?=?.67). In comparison with dermatologists' diagnosis, computer-aided diagnosis showed similar sensitivities and a 10 percentage points lower specificity, but the difference was not statistically significant. Studies were heterogeneous and substantial risk of bias was found in all but 4 of the 70 studies included in the quantitative analysis. Conclusions and Relevance:Although the accuracy of computer-aided diagnosis for melanoma detection is comparable to that of experts, the real-world applicability of these systems is unknown and potentially limited owing to overfitting and the risk of bias of the studies at hand.

Project description:IntroductionThe use of machine learning (ML) methods would improve the diagnosis of respiratory changes in systemic sclerosis (SSc). This paper evaluates the performance of several ML algorithms associated with the respiratory oscillometry analysis to aid in the diagnostic of respiratory changes in SSc. We also find out the best configuration for this task.MethodsOscillometric and spirometric exams were performed in 82 individuals, including controls (n = 30) and patients with systemic sclerosis with normal (n = 22) and abnormal (n = 30) spirometry. Multiple instance classifiers and different supervised machine learning techniques were investigated, including k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forests (RF), AdaBoost with decision trees (ADAB), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB).Results and discussionThe first experiment of this study showed that the best oscillometric parameter (BOP) was dynamic compliance, which provided moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.77) in the scenario control group versus patients with sclerosis and normal spirometry (CGvsPSNS). In the scenario control group versus patients with sclerosis and altered spirometry (CGvsPSAS), the BOP obtained high accuracy (AUC = 0.94). In the second experiment, the ML techniques were used. In CGvsPSNS, KNN achieved the best result (AUC = 0.90), significantly improving the accuracy in comparison with the BOP (p < 0.01), while in CGvsPSAS, RF obtained the best results (AUC = 0.97), also significantly improving the diagnostic accuracy (p < 0.05). In the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth experiments, different feature selection techniques allowed us to spot the best oscillometric parameters. They resulted in a small increase in diagnostic accuracy in CGvsPSNS (respectively, 0.87, 0.86, 0.82, and 0.84), while in the CGvsPSAS, the best classifier's performance remained the same (AUC = 0.97).ConclusionsOscillometric principles combined with machine learning algorithms provide a new method for diagnosing respiratory changes in patients with systemic sclerosis. The present study's findings provide evidence that this combination may help in the early diagnosis of respiratory changes in these patients.

Dataset Information

Developments in the detection of diabetic retinopathy: a state-of-the-art review of computer-aided diagnosis and machine learning methods.

Supplementary information

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets