Dataset Information

Short-term/long-term prognosis with or without beta-blockers in patients without heart failure and with preserved ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The role of beta-blockers in acute myocardial infarction patients without heart failure and with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 50%) is unknown. Our study aimed to retrospectively analyze the associations of beta-blockers on such patients.

Methods

This is a multicenter, retrospective study. After screening 5,332 acute myocardial infarction patients, a total of 2519 patients without heart failure and with LVEF ≥ 50% were included. The patients were divided into two groups: the prescribed (n = 2049) and unprescribed (n = 470) beta-blockers group. The propensity score inverse probability treatment weighting was used to control confounding factors. We analyzed the associations between beta-blockers and outcomes in the short-term (1-year) and long-term (median, 3.61 years).

Results

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were all-cause rehospitalization, cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction, new-onset heart failure rehospitalization. This study shows no statistically significant association between discharged with beta-blockers and all-cause mortality, either in the short-term [IPTW Adjusted, HR 1.02; 95%CI 0.43-2.40; P = 0.966] or long-term [IPTW Adjusted, HR 1.17; 95%CI 0.70-1.94; P = 0.547]. Discharged with beta-blockers was significantly associated with a reduced risk of short-term recurrent myocardial infarction [IPTW Adjusted, HR 0.44; 95%CI 0.20-0.97; P = 0.043], but there was no long-term relationship [IPTW Adjusted, HR 1.11; 95%CI 0.61-2.03; P = 0.735]. Other outcomes, such as new-onset heart failure rehospitalization and all-cause rehospitalization, were not observed with meaningful differences in either the short- or long-term. The results of sensitivity analysis were consistent with this.

Conclusions

Beta-blockers might be associated with a reduced risk of recurrent myocardial infarction in patients without heart failure and with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction, in the short term. Beta-blockers might not be related to all-cause mortality in those patients, either in the short-term or long-term. Clinical trial registration Influence of Beta-blockers on Prognosis in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated with Normal Ejection Fraction, NCT04485988, Registered on 24/07/2020. Retrospectively registered.

SUBMITTER: Wen XS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9044853 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Abstract Background There is a lack of evidence regarding the benefits of maintenance β–blocker (BB) treatment in post–acute AMI patients (pts) without reduced LVEF in the era of invasive management. Design and Trial Status REBOOT is an independent multinational pragmatic, controlled, randomized, open–label, with blinded endpoint adjudication clinical trial testing the benefits of BB maintenance therapy in post–AMI pts (either with or without ST segment elevation) discharged with LVEF >40%. Patients ≥18 years (yr) old undergoing invasive management during admission and without history of heart failure (HF) are eligible to participate. At discharge, pts are 1:1 randomized to either receive BB (agent and dose chosen by the treating physician) or no BB therapy. The primary endpoint is a composite of “all–cause death, nonfatal reAMI, or HF hospitalization” over a minimum follow–up period of 2 yr. Key secondary endpoints are: a) the incidence rate of each individual component of the composite endpoint; b) cardiovascular death; c) admission for sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation; and d) admission for atrial fibrillation. Events will be adjudicated by a blinded committee. A sample size of 8468 pts (728 events) was estimated to provide a power of 85% to detect a relative risk reduction of 20% (incidence of primary endpoint in control 10%) and assuming 5% withdrawals. Statistical analyses will be conducted according to the intention–to–treat principle, although a pre–specified per–protocol analysis will also be performed. The Spanish National Center for Cardiovascular Research (CNIC) is the sponsor of the trial, which has no external funding. CNIC coordinates ≥75 Spanish centers, while Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS coordinate 33 Cardiology Centers distributed in 10 Italian regions. The first pt was included in Spain in October 2018, in Italy in January 2019. The end of enrollment is anticipated in December 2022. At 09 December 2021, 5669 pts had been enrolled from which 1263 in Italy (Figure). Pts baseline characteristics are described in the Table. Hospital admission data for COVID–19 pre and post randomization were also recorded since June 2020. Conclusions The REBOOT trial (NCT03596385) will fill the existing scientific gap on the efficacy of β–BB after AMI in pts with LVEF > 40% and no HF who are treated according to current standard–of–care. REBOOT trial results might have an impact on clinical practice guidelines.

Project description:BACKGROUND:The role of coronary microvascular disease and its impact on functional and energetic reserve in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains unclear. We hypothesized that in response to submaximal pharmacologic stress (dobutamine), patients with HFpEF have impairment in left ventricular (LV) myocardial mechanical (external work [EW]), energetic (myocardial O2 consumption [MVO2]), and myocardial blood flow (MBF) reserve. We further assessed whether coupling of MBF to EW is impaired in HFpEF and associated with compensatory increases or pathological decreases in myocardial O2 extraction. Lastly, we assessed whether coupling of MVO2 to EW (mechanical efficiency) was impaired in HFpEF. METHODS AND RESULTS:In prospectively enrolled patients with HFpEF (n=19) and age/sex-matched healthy controls (n=19), we performed 11C-acetate positron emission tomography assessing MVO2 and MBF at rest and during dobutamine infusion. EW was calculated as stroke volume (echo)×end-systolic pressure×heart rate. At rest, compared with controls, patients with HFpEF had higher LV EW, MVO2, and MBF. With dobutamine, LV EW, MVO2, and MBF increased in both HFpEF and controls; however, the magnitude of increases was significantly smaller in HFpEF. In both groups, MBF increased in relation to EW, but in HFpEF, the slope of the relationship was significantly smaller than in controls. Myocardial O2 extraction was increased in HFpEF. Mechanical efficiency was similar in HFpEF and controls. In a post hoc analysis, HFpEF patients with LV hypertrophy (n=10) had significant reductions in LV mechanical efficiency relative to controls. CONCLUSIONS:In HFpEF during submaximal dobutamine stress, there is myocardial mechanical-, energetic- and flow-reserve dysfunction with impaired coupling of blood flow to demand and slight increases in myocardial O2 extraction. These findings provide evidence that coronary microvascular dysfunction is present in HFpEF, limits O2 supply relative to demand, and is associated with reserve dysfunction.

Project description:AimsThe prevalence of heart failure (HF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is common. Contemporary data are lacking on the prognostic utility of the measurement of biomarker for patients with AMI complicated by HF according to preserved (HFpEF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We aim to assess the association between D-dimer levels and all-cause mortality in patients with AMI complicated by different HF subtypes during hospitalization in the context of other risk factors.Methods and resultsWe enrolled 4495 patients with AMI with complete clinical and laboratory variable assessments in this cohort. D-dimer levels were measured on admission immediately at baseline. We used Cox proportional hazards analysis to assess this association accounting for 18 relevant clinical variables. During the index hospitalization, 589 patients with AMI developed HFpEF, 513 patients with AMI developed HFrEF, and 3393 patients with AMI did not develop HF. The patients were divided into HFpEF, HFrEF, and non-HF groups accordingly. The median length of follow-up was 1 year (range: 1 to 24 months). During the whole follow-up, 58 (15.5%), 107 (27.9%), and 96 (4.2%) of the patients experienced death event in HFpEF, HFrEF, and non-HF groups, respectively. In each group, the patients were divided into high or low D-dimer levels according to D-dimer concentration (145 ng/mL). In the fully adjusted model, the risk of all-cause mortality of those patients with high D-dimer levels was 2.09 [95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.08 to 4.02, P = 0.02] times as high as the risk of patients with low D-dimer levels in HFpEF group. When analysing D-dimer as a continuous variable, this associations still existed. But there was no significant association between D-dimer concentration and all-cause mortality in HFrEF [hazard ratio (HR): 1.25, CI: 0.76 to 2.04, P = 0.37] or non-HF (HR: 1.56, CI: 0.98 to 2.47, P = 0.06), respectively, after fully adjustment for other key clinical variables.ConclusionsHigh D-dimer levels on admission were found to be strongly associated with the subsequent cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality in patients with AMI complicated by HFpEF.

Project description:BackgroundHeart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) constitutes half of all HF but lacks effective therapy. Understanding of its myocardial biology remains limited because of a paucity of heart tissue molecular analysis.MethodsWe performed RNA sequencing on right ventricular septal endomyocardial biopsies prospectively obtained from patients meeting consensus criteria for HFpEF (n=41) contrasted with right ventricular septal tissue from patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, n=30) and donor controls (n=24). Principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering tested for transcriptomic distinctiveness between groups, effect of comorbidities, and differential gene expression with pathway enrichment contrasted HF groups and donor controls. Within HFpEF, non-negative matrix factorization and weighted gene coexpression analysis identified molecular subgroups, and the resulting clusters were correlated with hemodynamic and clinical data.ResultsPatients with HFpEF were more often women (59%), African American (68%), obese (median body mass index 41), and hypertensive (98%), with clinical HF characterized by 65% New York Heart Association Class III or IV, nearly all on a loop diuretic, and 70% with a HF hospitalization in the previous year. Principal component analysis separated HFpEF from HFrEF and donor controls with minimal overlap, and this persisted after adjusting for primary comorbidities: body mass index, sex, age, diabetes, and renal function. Hierarchical clustering confirmed group separation. Nearly half the significantly altered genes in HFpEF versus donor controls (1882 up, 2593 down) changed in the same direction in HFrEF; however, 5745 genes were uniquely altered between HF groups. Compared with controls, uniquely upregulated genes in HFpEF were enriched in mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate synthesis/electron transport, pathways downregulated in HFrEF. HFpEF-specific downregulated genes engaged endoplasmic reticulum stress, autophagy, and angiogenesis. Body mass index differences largely accounted for HFpEF upregulated genes, whereas neither this nor broader comorbidity adjustment altered pathways enriched in downregulated genes. Non-negative matrix factorization identified 3 HFpEF transcriptomic subgroups with distinctive pathways and clinical correlates, including a group closest to HFrEF with higher mortality, and a mostly female group with smaller hearts and proinflammatory signaling. These groupings remained after sex adjustment. Weighted gene coexpression analysis yielded analogous gene clusters and clinical groupings.ConclusionsHFpEF exhibits distinctive broad transcriptomic signatures and molecular subgroupings with particular clinical features and outcomes. The data reveal new signaling targets to consider for precision therapeutics.