Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Antegrade brushing cytology through the EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage route (with video).

ABSTRACT:

SUBMITTER: Ogura T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9059796 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Mar-Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

Antegrade brushing cytology through the EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage route (with video).

Ogura Takeshi T Ueno Saori S Okuda Atsushi A Nishioka Nobu N Higuchi Kazuhide K

Endoscopic ultrasound 20220301 2

PMID: 34213432

Similar Datasets

EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage with rendezvous technique for post-Whipple pancreatic duct stone.

Project description:Video 1EUS-guided pancreatic drainage using the rendezvous technique in a patient with pancreaticojejunal anastomosis stenosis and pancreatic duct stone.

| S-EPMC8573592 | biostudies-literature

Safety and efficacy of ultra-tapered mechanical dilator for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy and pancreatic duct drainage compared with electrocautery dilator (with video).

Project description:Background and objectivesSuccessful tract dilation is one of the most important steps to accomplish EUS-guided drainage. Although mechanical dilation is safer than electrocautery dilation, no dedicated mechanical dilator (MD) is currently available. Thus, we developed a new ultra-tapered MD for EUS-guided drainage. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and usefulness of this novel MD.Patients and methodsConsecutive patients who underwent EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) or EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PD) at two centers were included in the study. Dilation of the needle tract was initially performed with a diathermic sheath or the ultra-tapered MD. Technical success and adverse events were assessed.ResultsSixty-four patients (mean age = 68.9 ± 13.8 years, 35 men) underwent EUS-HGS (49 patients) and EUS-PD (15 patients). Thirty-three patients were included in the cautery dilator (CD) group and 31 in the ultra-tapered MD group. Initial dilation of the puncture site was achieved in 95.3% (61/64): 97% (32/33) of the patients in the CD group and 93.3% (29/31) of the patients in the MD group (P < 0.05). Adverse events were observed in 14 patients: abdominal pain in 8 patients and bleeding in 6 patients at the puncture site. All bleedings occurred in the CD group and there was no patient in whom bleeding occurred after EUS intervention in the MD group (P = 0.04).ConclusionThe novel ultra-tapered MD designed for interventional EUS appears to be safe and useful as it reduced postprocedure bleeding with a high technical success rate compared with the conventional electrocautery dilator.

| S-EPMC6289009 | biostudies-literature

Jumping technique for guidewire manipulation within an intrahepatic bile duct during EUS-guided biliary drainage (with video).