Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Cost-effectiveness of easy-access, risk-informed oral pre-exposure prophylaxis in HIV epidemics in sub-Saharan Africa: a modelling study.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Approaches that allow easy access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), such as over-the-counter provision at pharmacies, could facilitate risk-informed PrEP use and lead to lower HIV incidence, but their cost-effectiveness is unknown. We aimed to evaluate conditions under which risk-informed PrEP use is cost-effective.

Methods

We applied a mathematical model of HIV transmission to simulate 3000 setting-scenarios reflecting a range of epidemiological characteristics of communities in sub-Saharan Africa. The prevalence of HIV viral load greater than 1000 copies per mL among all adults (HIV positive and negative) varied from 1·1% to 7·4% (90% range). We hypothesised that if PrEP was made easily available without restriction and with education regarding its use, women and men would use PrEP, with sufficient daily adherence, during so-called seasons of risk (ie, periods in which individuals are at risk of acquiring infection). We refer to this as risk-informed PrEP. For each setting-scenario, we considered the situation in mid-2021 and performed a pairwise comparison of the outcomes of two policies: immediate PrEP scale-up and then continuation for 50 years, and no PrEP. We estimated the relationship between epidemic and programme characteristics and cost-effectiveness of PrEP availability to all during seasons of risk. For our base-case analysis, we assumed a 3-monthly PrEP cost of US$29 (drug $11, HIV test $4, and $14 for additional costs necessary to facilitate education and access), a cost-effectiveness threshold of $500 per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted, an annual discount rate of 3%, and a time horizon of 50 years. In sensitivity analyses, we considered a cost-effectiveness threshold of $100 per DALY averted, a discount rate of 7% per annum, the use of PrEP outside of seasons of risk, and reduced uptake of risk-informed PrEP.

Findings

In the context of PrEP scale-up such that 66% (90% range across setting-scenarios 46-81) of HIV-negative people with at least one non-primary condomless sex partner take PrEP in any given period, resulting in 2·6% (0·9-6·0) of all HIV negative adults taking PrEP at any given time, risk-informed PrEP was predicted to reduce HIV incidence by 49% (23-78) over 50 years compared with no PrEP. PrEP was cost-effective in 71% of all setting-scenarios, and cost-effective in 76% of setting-scenarios with prevalence of HIV viral load greater than 1000 copies per mL among all adults higher than 2%. In sensitivity analyses with a $100 per DALY averted cost-effectiveness threshold, a 7% per year discount rate, or with PrEP use that was less well risk-informed than in our base case, PrEP was less likely to be cost-effective, but generally remained cost-effective if the prevalence of HIV viral load greater than 1000 copies per mL among all adults was higher than 3%. In sensitivity analyses based on additional setting-scenarios in which risk-informed PrEP was less extensively used, the HIV incidence reduction was smaller, but the cost-effectiveness of risk-informed PrEP was undiminished.

Interpretation

Under the assumption that making PrEP easily accessible for all adults in sub-Saharan Africa in the context of community education leads to risk-informed use, PrEP is likely to be cost-effective in settings with prevalence of HIV viral load greater than 1000 copies per mL among all adults higher than 2%, suggesting the need for implementation of such approaches, with ongoing evaluation.

Funding

US Agency for International Development, US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

SUBMITTER: Phillips AN 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9065367 | biostudies-literature | 2022 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Cost-effectiveness of easy-access, risk-informed oral pre-exposure prophylaxis in HIV epidemics in sub-Saharan Africa: a modelling study.

Phillips Andrew N AN   Bershteyn Anna A   Revill Paul P   Bansi-Matharu Loveleen L   Kripke Katharine K   Boily Marie-Claude MC   Martin-Hughes Rowan R   Johnson Leigh F LF   Mukandavire Zindoga Z   Jamieson Lise L   Meyer-Rath Gesine G   Hallett Timothy B TB   Ten Brink Debra D   Kelly Sherrie L SL   Nichols Brooke E BE   Bendavid Eran E   Mudimu Edinah E   Taramusi Isaac I   Smith Jennifer J   Dalal Shona S   Baggaley Rachel R   Crowley Siobhan S   Terris-Prestholt Fern F   Godfrey-Faussett Peter P   Mukui Irene I   Jahn Andreas A   Case Kelsey K KK   Havlir Diane D   Petersen Maya M   Kamya Moses M   Koss Catherine A CA   Balzer Laura B LB   Apollo Tsitsi T   Chidarikire Thato T   Mellors John W JW   Parikh Urvi M UM   Godfrey Catherine C   Cambiano Valentina V  

The lancet. HIV 20220501 5


<h4>Background</h4>Approaches that allow easy access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), such as over-the-counter provision at pharmacies, could facilitate risk-informed PrEP use and lead to lower HIV incidence, but their cost-effectiveness is unknown. We aimed to evaluate conditions under which risk-informed PrEP use is cost-effective.<h4>Methods</h4>We applied a mathematical model of HIV transmission to simulate 3000 setting-scenarios reflecting a range of epidemiological characteristics of co  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6753289 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5043081 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11850439 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2367053 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9939943 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7048876 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11772214 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6922023 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11519315 | biostudies-literature