Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Olfactory dysfunction is more severe in wild-type SARS-CoV-2 infection than in the Delta variant (B.1.617.2).


ABSTRACT: Olfactory dysfunction is common in COVID-19, and sudden-onset dysosmia is an early marker for wild-type SARS-CoV-2 infection. Over 10 000 mutations of SARS-CoV-2 have been registered, with variants of concern (VOC) under particular scrutiny. We report a telemedicine-based, multicentre, prospective cohort study with quantitative olfaction testing comparing 79 patients with a confirmed VOC-Delta (n = 21) or wild-type (WT) SARS-CoV-2 infection. Acute SARS-CoV-2 infection led to significant decrease of olfactory function in both cohorts. A majority of patients suffered from hyposmia or anosmia at inclusion with only 26 individuals performing normosmic. Sniffin'Sticks total scores were significantly higher for VOC-Delta patients at onset of illness, compared to WT patients (p < 0.001). At 4 weeks follow-up, olfaction scores recovered only partially for WT patients, thus odds of recovery were stronger in VOC-Delta patients. Also, subjective self-rating of chemosensory function was lower in WT, compared to VOC-Delta patients. The need for ongoing olfaction studies and their prognosis in SARS-CoV-2 background remains urgent, also in the light of increasing numbers of olfaction-related patient presentations.

SUBMITTER: Klimek L 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9095455 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8641954 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9364919 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8566220 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10073010 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9961426 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8933737 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8801325 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9497716 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9519367 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8639073 | biostudies-literature