Dataset Information

Differences in interaction lead to the formation of different types of insulin amyloid.

ABSTRACT: Insulin balls, localized insulin amyloids formed at the site of repeated insulin injections in patients with diabetes, cause poor glycemic control and cytotoxicity. Our previous study has shown that insulin forms two types of amyloids; toxic amyloid formed from the intact insulin ((i)-amyloid) and less-toxic amyloid formed in the presence of the reducing reagent TCEP ((r)-amyloid), suggesting insulin amyloid polymorphism. However, the differences in the formation mechanism and cytotoxicity expression are still unclear. Herein, we demonstrate that the liquid droplets, which are stabilized by electrostatic interactions, appear only in the process of toxic (i)-amyloid formation, but not in the less-toxic (r)-amyloid formation process. The effect of various additives such as arginine, 1,6-hexanediol, and salts on amyloid formation was also examined to investigate interactions that are important for amyloid formation. Our results indicate that the maturation processes of these two amyloids were significantly different, whereas the nucleation by hydrophobic interactions was similar. These results also suggest the difference in the formation mechanism of two different insulin amyloids is attributed to the difference in the intermolecular interactions and could be correlated with the cytotoxicity.

SUBMITTER: Mori W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9123177 | biostudies-literature | 2022 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Differences in interaction lead to the formation of different types of insulin amyloid.

Mori Wakako W Kawakami Ryosuke R Niko Yosuke Y Haruta Tomohiro T Imamura Takeshi T Shiraki Kentaro K Zako Tamotsu T

Scientific reports 20220520 1

Insulin balls, localized insulin amyloids formed at the site of repeated insulin injections in patients with diabetes, cause poor glycemic control and cytotoxicity. Our previous study has shown that insulin forms two types of amyloids; toxic amyloid formed from the intact insulin ((i)-amyloid) and less-toxic amyloid formed in the presence of the reducing reagent TCEP ((r)-amyloid), suggesting insulin amyloid polymorphism. However, the differences in the formation mechanism and cytotoxicity expre ...[more]

PMID: 35595809

Similar Datasets

Project description:Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are associated with multiple types of biases partly rooted in technical limitations of the experimental techniques. Another source of bias are the different frequencies with which proteins have been studied for interaction partners. It is generally believed that proteins with a large number of interaction partners tend to be essential, evolutionarily conserved, and involved in disease. It has been repeatedly reported that proteins driving tumor formation have a higher number of PPI partners. However, it has been noticed before that the degree distribution of PPI networks is biased toward disease proteins, which tend to have been studied more often than non-disease proteins. At the same time, for many poorly characterized proteins no interactions have been reported yet. It is unclear to which extent this study bias affects the observation that cancer proteins tend to have more PPI partners. Here, we show that the degree of a protein is a function of the number of times it has been screened for interaction partners. We present a randomization-based method that controls for this bias to decide whether a group of proteins is associated with significantly more PPI partners than the proteomic background. We apply our method to cancer proteins and observe, in contrast to previous studies, no conclusive evidence for a significantly higher degree distribution associated with cancer proteins as compared to non-cancer proteins when we compare them to proteins that have been equally often studied as bait proteins. Comparing proteins from different tumor types, a more complex picture emerges in which proteins of certain cancer classes have significantly more interaction partners while others are associated with a smaller degree. For example, proteins of several hematological cancers tend to be associated with a higher number of interaction partners as expected by chance. Solid tumors, in contrast, are usually associated with a degree distribution similar to those of equally often studied random protein sets. We discuss the biological implications of these findings. Our work shows that accounting for biases in the PPI network is possible and increases the value of PPI data.

Dataset Information

Differences in interaction lead to the formation of different types of insulin amyloid.

Publications

Differences in interaction lead to the formation of different types of insulin amyloid.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets