Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

21 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Deep learning tools are top performers in long non-coding RNA prediction.

ABSTRACT: The increasing amount of transcriptomic data has brought to light vast numbers of potential novel RNA transcripts. Accurately distinguishing novel long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) from protein-coding messenger RNAs (mRNAs) has challenged bioinformatic tool developers. Most recently, tools implementing deep learning architectures have been developed for this task, with the potential of discovering sequence features and their interactions still not surfaced in current knowledge. We compared the performance of deep learning tools with other predictive tools that are currently used in lncRNA coding potential prediction. A total of 15 tools representing the variety of available methods were investigated. In addition to known annotated transcripts, we also evaluated the use of the tools in actual studies with real-life data. The robustness and scalability of the tools' performance was tested with varying sized test sets and test sets with different proportions of lncRNAs and mRNAs. In addition, the ease-of-use for each tested tool was scored. Deep learning tools were top performers in most metrics and labelled transcripts similarly with each other in the real-life dataset. However, the proportion of lncRNAs and mRNAs in the test sets affected the performance of all tools. Computational resources were utilized differently between the top-ranking tools, thus the nature of the study may affect the decision of choosing one well-performing tool over another. Nonetheless, the results suggest favouring the novel deep learning tools over other tools currently in broad use.

SUBMITTER: Ammunet T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9123429 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

circDeep: deep learning approach for circular RNA classification from other long non-coding RNA.

Project description:MOTIVATION:Over the past two decades, a circular form of RNA (circular RNA), produced through alternative splicing, has become the focus of scientific studies due to its major role as a microRNA (miRNA) activity modulator and its association with various diseases including cancer. Therefore, the detection of circular RNAs is vital to understanding their biogenesis and purpose. Prediction of circular RNA can be achieved in three steps: distinguishing non-coding RNAs from protein coding gene transcripts, separating short and long non-coding RNAs and predicting circular RNAs from other long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). However, the available tools are less than 80 percent accurate for distinguishing circular RNAs from other lncRNAs due to difficulty of classification. Therefore, the availability of a more accurate and fast machine learning method for the identification of circular RNAs, which considers the specific features of circular RNA, is essential to the development of systematic annotation. RESULTS:Here we present an End-to-End deep learning framework, circDeep, to classify circular RNA from other lncRNA. circDeep fuses an RCM descriptor, ACNN-BLSTM sequence descriptor and a conservation descriptor into high level abstraction descriptors, where the shared representations across different modalities are integrated. The experiments show that circDeep is not only faster than existing tools but also performs at an unprecedented level of accuracy by achieving a 12 percent increase in accuracy over the other tools. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION:https://github.com/UofLBioinformatics/circDeep. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

| S-EPMC6956777 | biostudies-literature

Interpretable Deep Learning Model Reveals Subsequences of Various Functions for Long Non-Coding RNA Identification.

Project description:Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play crucial roles in many biological processes and are implicated in several diseases. With the next-generation sequencing technologies, substantial unannotated transcripts have been discovered. Classifying unannotated transcripts using biological experiments are more time-consuming and expensive than computational approaches. Several tools are available for identifying long non-coding RNAs. These tools, however, did not explain the features in their tools that contributed to the prediction results. Here, we present Xlnc1DCNN, a tool for distinguishing long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) from protein-coding transcripts (PCTs) using a one-dimensional convolutional neural network with prediction explanations. The evaluation results of the human test set showed that Xlnc1DCNN outperformed other state-of-the-art tools in terms of accuracy and F1-score. The explanation results revealed that lncRNA transcripts were mainly identified as sequences with no conserved regions, short patterns with unknown functions, or only regions of transmembrane helices while protein-coding transcripts were mostly classified by conserved protein domains or families. The explanation results also conveyed the probably inconsistent annotations among the public databases, lncRNA transcripts which contain protein domains, protein families, or intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). Xlnc1DCNN is freely available at https://github.com/cucpbioinfo/Xlnc1DCNN.

| S-EPMC9173695 | biostudies-literature

Large-scale prediction of long non-coding RNA functions in a coding-non-coding gene co-expression network.

Project description:Although accumulating evidence has provided insight into the various functions of long-non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), the exact functions of the majority of such transcripts are still unknown. Here, we report the first computational annotation of lncRNA functions based on public microarray expression profiles. A coding-non-coding gene co-expression (CNC) network was constructed from re-annotated Affymetrix Mouse Genome Array data. Probable functions for altogether 340 lncRNAs were predicted based on topological or other network characteristics, such as module sharing, association with network hubs and combinations of co-expression and genomic adjacency. The functions annotated to the lncRNAs mainly involve organ or tissue development (e.g. neuron, eye and muscle development), cellular transport (e.g. neuronal transport and sodium ion, acid or lipid transport) or metabolic processes (e.g. involving macromolecules, phosphocreatine and tyrosine).

| S-EPMC3089475 | biostudies-other

Deep learning predicts short non-coding RNA functions from only raw sequence data.

Project description:Small non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are short non-coding sequences involved in gene regulation in many biological processes and diseases. The lack of a complete comprehension of their biological functionality, especially in a genome-wide scenario, has demanded new computational approaches to annotate their roles. It is widely known that secondary structure is determinant to know RNA function and machine learning based approaches have been successfully proven to predict RNA function from secondary structure information. Here we show that RNA function can be predicted with good accuracy from a lightweight representation of sequence information without the necessity of computing secondary structure features which is computationally expensive. This finding appears to go against the dogma of secondary structure being a key determinant of function in RNA. Compared to recent secondary structure based methods, the proposed solution is more robust to sequence boundary noise and reduces drastically the computational cost allowing for large data volume annotations. Scripts and datasets to reproduce the results of experiments proposed in this study are available at: https://github.com/bioinformatics-sannio/ncrna-deep.

| S-EPMC7682815 | biostudies-literature

Differential gene expression analysis tools exhibit substandard performance for long non-coding RNA-sequencing data.

Project description:BackgroundLong non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are typically expressed at low levels and are inherently highly variable. This is a fundamental challenge for differential expression (DE) analysis. In this study, the performance of 25 pipelines for testing DE in RNA-seq data is comprehensively evaluated, with a particular focus on lncRNAs and low-abundance mRNAs. Fifteen performance metrics are used to evaluate DE tools and normalization methods using simulations and analyses of six diverse RNA-seq datasets.ResultsGene expression data are simulated using non-parametric procedures in such a way that realistic levels of expression and variability are preserved in the simulated data. Throughout the assessment, results for mRNA and lncRNA were tracked separately. All the pipelines exhibit inferior performance for lncRNAs compared to mRNAs across all simulated scenarios and benchmark RNA-seq datasets. The substandard performance of DE tools for lncRNAs applies also to low-abundance mRNAs. No single tool uniformly outperformed the others. Variability, number of samples, and fraction of DE genes markedly influenced DE tool performance.ConclusionsOverall, linear modeling with empirical Bayes moderation (limma) and a non-parametric approach (SAMSeq) showed good control of the false discovery rate and reasonable sensitivity. Of note, for achieving a sensitivity of at least 50%, more than 80 samples are required when studying expression levels in realistic settings such as in clinical cancer research. About half of the methods showed a substantial excess of false discoveries, making these methods unreliable for DE analysis and jeopardizing reproducible science. The detailed results of our study can be consulted through a user-friendly web application, giving guidance on selection of the optimal DE tool ( http://statapps.ugent.be/tools/AppDGE/ ).

| S-EPMC6058388 | biostudies-literature

Benchmarking deep learning splice prediction tools using functional splice assays.

Project description:Hereditary disorders are frequently caused by genetic variants that affect pre-messenger RNA splicing. Though genetic variants in the canonical splice motifs are almost always disrupting splicing, the pathogenicity of variants in the noncanonical splice sites (NCSS) and deep intronic (DI) regions are difficult to predict. Multiple splice prediction tools have been developed for this purpose, with the latest tools employing deep learning algorithms. We benchmarked established and deep learning splice prediction tools on published gold standard sets of 71 NCSS and 81 DI variants in the ABCA4 gene and 61 NCSS variants in the MYBPC3 gene with functional assessment in midigene and minigene splice assays. The selection of splice prediction tools included CADD, DSSP, GeneSplicer, MaxEntScan, MMSplice, NNSPLICE, SPIDEX, SpliceAI, SpliceRover, and SpliceSiteFinder-like. The best-performing splice prediction tool for the different variants was SpliceRover for ABCA4 NCSS variants, SpliceAI for ABCA4 DI variants, and the Alamut 3/4 consensus approach (GeneSplicer, MaxEntScacn, NNSPLICE and SpliceSiteFinder-like) for NCSS variants in MYBPC3 based on the area under the receiver operator curve. Overall, the performance in a real-time clinical setting is much more modest than reported by the developers of the tools.

| S-EPMC8360004 | biostudies-literature

Long non-coding RNA-based signatures to improve prognostic prediction of breast cancer.

Project description:Breast cancer (BC) is a disease of high mortality rate because of high malignant, while early diagnosis and personal management may make a better prognosis possible. This study aimed to establish and validate lncRNAs signatures to improve the prognostic prediction for BC.RNA sequencing data along with the corresponding clinical information of patients with BC were gained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Prognostic differentially expressed lncRNAs were obtained using differentially expressed lncRNAs analysis (P value <.01 and |fold change| > 2) and univariate cox regression (P value <.05). By applying least absolute shrinkage and selection operation (LASSO) Cox regression analysis along with 10-fold cross-validation, 2 lncRNA-based signatures were constructed in the training, test and whole set.A 14-lncRNAs signature and a 10-lncRNAs signature were built for overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) respectively in the 3 sets. BC patients were divided into high-risk groups and low-risk groups depended on median risk score value. Significant differences were found for OS and RFS between 2 groups in the 3 sets. The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis demonstrated that our lncRNAs signatures had better predictive capacities of survival and recurrence for BC patients as well as enhancing the predictive ability of the tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage system.These results indicate that the 2 lncRNAs signatures with the potential to be biomarkers to predict the prognosis of BC for OS and RFS.

| S-EPMC7535645 | biostudies-literature

A long non-coding RNA signature to improve prognosis prediction of gastric cancer.

Project description:BackgroundIncreasing evidence suggests long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are frequently aberrantly expressed in cancers, however, few related lncRNA signatures have been established for prediction of cancer prognosis. We aimed at developing alncRNA signature to improve prognosis prediction of gastric cancer (GC).MethodsUsing a lncRNA-mining approach, we performed lncRNA expression profiling in large GC cohorts from Gene Expression Ominus (GEO), including GSE62254 data set (N = 300) and GSE15459 data set (N = 192). We established a set of 24-lncRNAs that were significantly associated with the disease free survival (DFS) in the test series.ResultsBased on this 24-lncRNA signature, the test series patients could be classified into high-risk or low-risk subgroup with significantly different DFS (HR = 1.19, 95 % CI = 1.13-1.25, P < 0.0001). The prognostic value of this 24-lncRNA signature was confirmed in the internal validation series and another external validation series, respectively. Further analysis revealed that the prognostic value of this signature was independent of lymph node ratio (LNR) and postoperative chemotherapy. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) indicated that high risk score group was associated with several cancer recurrence and metastasis associated pathways.ConclusionsThe identification of the prognostic lncRNAs indicates the potential roles of lncRNAs in GC biogenesis. Our results may provide an efficient classification tool for clinical prognosis evaluation of GC.

| S-EPMC5029104 | biostudies-literature

A long non-coding RNA signature to improve prognosis prediction of colorectal cancer.

Project description:Increasing evidence suggests long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are frequently aberrantly expressed in cancers, however, few related lncRNA signatures have been established for prediction of cancer prognosis. We aimed to develop a lncRNA signature to improve prognosis prediction of colorectal cancer (CRC). Using a lncRNA-mining approach, we performed lncRNA expression profiling in large CRC cohorts from Gene Expression Ominus (GEO), including GSE39582 test series(N=436), internal validation series (N=117); and two independent validation series GSE14333 (N=197) and GSE17536(N=145). We established a set of six lncRNAs that were significantly correlated with the disease free survival (DFS) in the test series. Based on this six-lncRNA signature, the test series patients could be classified into high-risk and low-risk subgroups with significantly different DFS (HR=2.670; P<0.0001). The prognostic value of this six-lncRNA signature was confirmed in the internal validation series and another two independent CRC sets. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) analysis suggested that risk score positively correlated with several cancer metastasis related pathways. Functional experiments demonstrated three dysregulated lncRNAs, AK123657, BX648207 and BX649059 were required for efficient invasion and proliferation suppression in CRC cell lines. Our results might provide an efficient classification tool for clinical prognosis evaluation of CRC.

| S-EPMC4039159 | biostudies-literature

Study on the expression of long-chain non coding RNA and coding gene in patients with colorectal cancer

Project description:Interventions: lesion tissues vs. adjacent tissues of colorectal cancer patients:nil Primary outcome(s): RNA Study Design: Factorial

| 2693518 | ecrin-mdr-crc

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data