Dataset Information

Endoscopic Posterior Ankle Decompression and Release After Total Ankle Arthroplasty

ABSTRACT: Accurate positioning of the total ankle arthroplasty implant components with the absence of any hindfoot deformity does not preclude the development of bony impingement. In cases of ankle stiffness after total ankle arthroplasty, the usual limitation is in dorsiflexion. If triceps surae contracture is excluded or persistent restriction remains in ankle dorsiflexion after gastrocnemius recession or tendo-Achilles lengthening, posterior ankle capsulectomy, debridement of posterior ankle gutter, and release of the deep posterior deltoid ligament and the posterior talofibular ligament are indicated. In this Technical Note, the technical details of endoscopic posterior ankle decompression and release after total ankle arthroplasty are described. Technique Video Video 1 Endoscopic posterior ankle decompression and release after total ankle arthroplasty of the left ankle. The patient is in the prone position. Posteromedial portal is the viewing portal and posterolateral portal is the working portal. The flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon is exposed. The arthroscope is switched to the posterolateral portal and the posterolateral ankle capsule is resected with arthroscopic instruments via the posteromedial portal. The FHL tendon is pushed medially by the instruments to facilitate resection of the more medial posterior ankle capsule. The arthroscope is switched back to the posteromedial portal and the most lateral part of the posterior ankle capsule is resected with arthroscopic shaver and radiofrequency wand via the posterolateral portal. Then, the FHL tendon is looped with a vascular sling via the posterolateral portal and the tendon is retracted laterally. The medial part of the posterior ankle capsule is resected with arthroscopic instruments via the posteromedial portal. The fibrous tissue of the posteromedial ankle gutter is also resected. The arthroscope is switched to the posteromedial portal and the fibrous tissue of the posterolateral ankle gutter is resected. The scarred posterolateral ankle ligamentous structure and fibrous band is released from its calcaneal insertion. The arthroscope is switched back to the posterolateral portal and the scarred posteromedial ankle ligamentous structure and fibrous band is carefully cut by a No. 15 scalpel with the cutting blade facing laterally.

SUBMITTER: Lui T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9134246 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundJoint loading conditions have an effect on the development and management of ankle osteoarthritis and on aseptic loosening after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). Apart from body weight, compressive forces induced by muscle action may affect joint loading. However, few studies have evaluated the influence of individual muscles on the intraarticular pressure distribution in the ankle.Question/purposesThe purpose of this study was to measure intraarticular pressure distribution and, in particular, (1) to quantify the effect of individual muscle action on peak-pressure magnitude; and (2) to identify the location of the center of pressure in the weightbearing native ankles and ankles that had TAA.MethodsPeak pressure and intraarticular center of pressure were quantified during force alterations of four muscle groups (peronei, tibialis anterior, tibialis posterior, and triceps surae) in 10 cadaveric feet. The pressure was measured with a pressure sensitive array before and after implantation of a three-component mobile-bearing TAA prosthesis. Linear mixed-effects models were calculated and the y-intercept (b0) and the slope (b1) of the regression were used to quantify the size of the effect.ResultsMean maximum peak pressures of 2 MPa (± 2.6 MPa) and 6.2 MPa (± 3.6 MPa) were measured for the native and TAA joint respectively. The triceps surae greatly affect the magnitude of peak pressure in the native ankle (slope b1 = 0.174; p = 0.001) and TAA joint (slope b1 = 0.416; p = 0.001). Furthermore, the force of most muscles caused a posterior and lateral shift of the center of pressure in both conditions.ConclusionsOur results suggest that muscle force production has the potential to alter the pressure distribution in the native ankles and those with and TAA.Clinical relevanceOur study results help us to understand the effect of muscle forces on joint loading conditions which could be used in muscle training strategies and the design of better prosthetic components. Physical therapy or guided exercises may provide the potential to relieve areas in the joint that show signs of early osteoarthritis or reduce the contact stress on prosthetic components, potentially reducing the risk of TAA failure attributable to wear.

Project description:ImportanceCarpal tunnel release (CTR) technique may influence the likelihood of revision surgery. Prior studies of revision CTR following endoscopic CTR (ECTR) compared with open CTR (OCTR) have been limited by sample size and duration of follow-up.ObjectiveTo estimate the incidence of revision CTR following ECTR compared with OCTR in a national cohort.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study used data from the US Veterans Health Administration. Participants included all adults (age ≥18 years) undergoing at least 1 outpatient CTR from October 1, 1999, to May 20, 2021. Data were analyzed from May 21, 2021, to November 27, 2023.ExposureIndex CTR technique.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was time to revision CTR, defined as repeat ipsilateral CTR during the study period. Secondary outcomes were indications for revision, findings during revision, and additional procedures performed during revision.ResultsAmong 134 851 wrists from 103 455 patients (92 510 [89.4%] male; median [IQR] age, 62 [53-70] years) undergoing at least 1 CTR, 1809 wrists underwent at least 1 revision at a median (IQR) of 2.5 (1.0-3.8) years. In competing-risks analysis, the cumulative incidence of revision was 1.06% (95% CI, 0.99%-1.12%) at 5 years and 1.59% (95% CI, 1.51%-1.67%) at 10 years. ECTR was associated with increased hazard of revision CTR compared with OCTR (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.56; 95% CI, 1.34-1.81; P < .001). The risk difference for revision CTR associated with ECTR compared with OCTR was 0.57% (95% CI, 0.31%-0.84%) at 5 years (number needed to harm, 176) and 0.72% (95% CI, 0.36%-1.07%) at 10 years (number needed to harm, 139). Regardless of index CTR technique, the most common indication for revision was symptom recurrence (1062 wrists [58.7%]). A reconstituted transverse carpal ligament (TCL) was more common after ECTR compared with OCTR, whereas scarring of the overlying tissues and of the median nerve itself were more common following OCTR. Incomplete transverse-carpal-ligament release was observed in 251 of the wrists undergoing revision CTR (13.94%) and was more common among revisions following ECTR (odds ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.11-2.37; P = .01).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study of revision CTR in the Veterans Health Administration, ECTR was associated with increased risk of revision compared with OCTR, but the absolute risk was low regardless of technique. Intraoperative findings at revision varied significantly according to index CTR technique.

Project description:PurposeStability in the sagittal plane, particularly regarding anterior cruciate ligament compensation, and postoperative functionality and satisfaction remain issues in total knee arthroplasty. Therefore, this prospective study compared the clinical outcomes between medial-pivot-based and posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty based on anterior translation and clinical scores.MethodsTo assess outcomes of total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritis, the anterior translation distance of the tibia relative to the femur was measured at 30 and 60° of flexion using a KS measure Arthrometer at 6 months postoperatively. The 2011 Knee Society Score, Forgotten Joint Score, visual analogue scale for pain, and range of motion were assessed at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. The correlations among each score, anterior translation distance, range of motion, and visual analogue scale score for pain were investigated.ResultsThe medial-pivot and posterior-stabilised groups comprised 70 and 51 patients, respectively. The medial-pivot group exhibited a significantly shorter anterior translation distance at 60° flexion than the posterior-stabilised group. Furthermore, the medial-pivot group achieved significantly better outcomes regarding the visual analogue scale for pain, 2011 Knee Society Score, and Forgotten Joint Score than the posterior-stabilised group. A significant negative correlation was observed between the anterior translation distance and the function score of the 2011 Knee Society Score, whereas a significant positive correlation was found between the anterior translation distance and flexion angle, and between the extension angle and score of the Forgotten Joint Score or 2011 Knee Society Score. Significant negative correlations were also found between the pain visual analogue scale and both the 2011 Knee Society Score and Forgotten Joint Score.ConclusionIn total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, the medial-pivot group displayed a shorter anterior translation distance than the posterior-stabilised group at 6 months postoperatively. The visual analogue scale score for pain was also significantly lower in the medial-pivot group than that in the posterior-stabilised group at both 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Because a correlation was observed between the anterior translation distance and the function score, medial-pivot-based total knee arthroplasty was considered to significantly improve postoperative function compared to posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty.

Dataset Information

Endoscopic Posterior Ankle Decompression and Release After Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets