Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Diagnostic Accuracy of Wireless Capsule Endoscopy in Polyp Recognition Using Deep Learning: A Meta-Analysis.


ABSTRACT:

Aim

As the completed studies have small sample sizes and different algorithms, a meta-analysis was conducted to assess the accuracy of WCE in identifying polyps using deep learning.

Method

Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for potentially eligible studies published up to December 8, 2021, which were analysed on a per-image basis. STATA RevMan and Meta-DiSc were used to conduct this meta-analysis. A random effects model was used, and a subgroup and regression analysis was performed to explore sources of heterogeneity.

Results

Eight studies published between 2017 and 2021 included 819 patients, and 18,414 frames were eventually included in the meta-analysis. The summary estimates for the WCE in identifying polyps by deep learning were sensitivity 0.97 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.95-0.98); specificity 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.98); positive likelihood ratio 27.19 (95% CI, 15.32-50.42); negative likelihood ratio 0.03 (95% CI 0.02-0.05); diagnostic odds ratio 873.69 (95% CI, 387.34-1970.74); and the area under the sROC curve 0.99.

Conclusion

WCE uses deep learning to identify polyps with high accuracy, but multicentre prospective randomized controlled studies are needed in the future.

SUBMITTER: Mi J 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9159236 | biostudies-literature | 2022

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Diagnostic Accuracy of Wireless Capsule Endoscopy in Polyp Recognition Using Deep Learning: A Meta-Analysis.

Mi Junjie J   Han Xiaofang X   Han Xiaofang X   Wang Rong R   Ma Ruijun R   Zhao Danyu D  

International journal of clinical practice 20220319


<h4>Aim</h4>As the completed studies have small sample sizes and different algorithms, a meta-analysis was conducted to assess the accuracy of WCE in identifying polyps using deep learning.<h4>Method</h4>Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for potentially eligible studies published up to December 8, 2021, which were analysed on a per-image basis. STATA RevMan and Meta-DiSc were used to conduct this meta-analysis. A random effects model  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8715364 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1774425 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10137357 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10722702 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9374669 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8410868 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4683524 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8741689 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9731660 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6297930 | biostudies-literature