Dataset Information

[Formation of French oncology resident: A national survey].

ABSTRACT:

Background

COVID-19 pandemic troubled hospital and university's organization. Previous study showed oncology resident's formation has been impacted by pandemic. One year later, we aimed to evaluate the state of oncology resident's formation.

Methods

We conducted a transversal study written by AERIO and SJRO, released via social networks and mail to the French oncology residents.

Results

One hundred and sixty-four residents answered. Sixty-four (39%) were male and 99 (60.4%) were female, mean age was 26.8 years old, mean semester was 5.7. One hundred and five (64%) were medical oncologist and 53 (32.3%) were radiation oncologist. One hundred and forty residents (85.4%) had lectures during hospital internships, mainly in cancer center (77.1%) and academic hospitals (60.7%). One hundred and twenty-one residents (73.8%) had specialized diploma lectures, in 34.7% of case monthly. Respectively 42.7% and 18.3% of residents could access to their formation's day respectively rarely and never. Strengths of oncology residency were scientific dynamism (91.9%), clinical breadth (82%) and knowledge renewal (78.9%). Attractivity's obstacles to the residency were psychological arduousness (64%), administrative burden (48.2%) and too important worktime (47%).

Conclusion

This survey shows the state of play of French oncology residency's formation at the end of 2021.

SUBMITTER: Rousseau A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9167032 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

[Formation of French oncology resident: A national survey].

Rousseau Adrien A Laune Quentin Q Ollivier Luc L Naoun Natacha N Alexandre Jérôme J Giraud Philippe P Azria David D Delaye Matthieu M

Bulletin du cancer 20220604 7-8

<h4>Background</h4>COVID-19 pandemic troubled hospital and university's organization. Previous study showed oncology resident's formation has been impacted by pandemic. One year later, we aimed to evaluate the state of oncology resident's formation.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a transversal study written by AERIO and SJRO, released via social networks and mail to the French oncology residents.<h4>Results</h4>One hundred and sixty-four residents answered. Sixty-four (39%) were male and 99 (60.4%) ...[more]

PMID: 35672186

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeResidency training environments can differ significantly; therefore, resident satisfaction may vary widely among programs. Here, we sought to examine several variables in program satisfaction through a survey of radiation oncology (RO) trainees in the United States.Methods and materialsAn anonymous, institutional review board-approved, internet-based survey was developed and distributed to U.S. residents in RO in September 2016. This email-based survey assessed program-specific factors with regard to workload, work-life balance, and education as well as resident-specific factors such as marital status and postgraduate year. Binomial multivariable regression assessed the correlations between these factors and the endpoint of resident-reported likelihood of selecting an alternative RO residency program if given the choice again.ResultsA total of 215 residents completed the required survey sections, representing 29.3% of U.S. RO residents. When asked whether residency allowed for an adequate balance between work and personal life, the majority of residents (75.6%) agreed or strongly agreed, but a minority (9.3%) did not feel that residency allowed for sufficient time for personal life. The majority of residents (69.7%) indicated that they would choose the same residency program again, but 12.2% would have made a different choice. Almost three-fourths of residents (73.0%) felt that faculty and staff cared about the educational success of residents, but 9.27% did not. Binomial multivariable regression revealed that senior residents (odds ratio: 6.70; 95% confidence interval, 2.20-22.4) were more likely to desire a different residency program. In contrast, residents who reported constructive feedback use by the residency program (odds ratio:0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.91) were more satisfied with their program choice.ConclusionsMost RO residents reported satisfaction with their choice of residency program, but seniors had higher rates of dissatisfaction. Possible interventions to improve professional satisfaction include incorporating constructive resident feedback to enhance the program. The potential impact of job market pressures on seniors should be further explored.

Dataset Information

[Formation of French oncology resident: A national survey].

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

[Formation of French oncology resident: A national survey].

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets