Association of direct oral anticoagulant-proton pump inhibitor cotherapy with adverse outcomes: protocol for a population-based cohort study.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Introduction
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for primary and secondary prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. However, there remains controversy about the overall net clinical benefit of PPIs (omeprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole) when coprescribed with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban). Our objective is to explore the risk of clinically relevant events, including bleeding, thromboembolic events and death, in patients prescribed DOACs while taking PPIs versus no PPI.Methods and analysis
The protocol describes a retrospective cohort study of all Ontario residents aged 66 years or older with atrial fibrillation and at least one pharmacy dispensation for a DOAC identified using linked administrative healthcare databases covering 2009-2020. Ontario drug benefit dispensation records will be used to ascertain PPI exposure during DOAC therapy. The primary outcome is a composite of clinically relevant bleeding, thrombotic events or all-cause death. A minimum of 520 patients in total with at least one of the components of the composite outcome are needed. Poisson regression with a generalised estimating equation model will be used to calculate the adjusted incidence rate difference, incidence rate ratios 95% CI, adjusting for propensity for PPI use using inverse probability of treatment weights.Ethics and dissemination
This research is exempt from REB review under section 45 of Ontario's Personal Health Information Protection Act. We will report our findings in a peer-reviewed biomedical journal and present them at conferences. The study will provide useful evidence to optimise the coprescription of DOACs and PPIs in practice.
SUBMITTER: Wang M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9196177 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Importance:Anticoagulant choice and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) cotherapy could affect the risk of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, a frequent and potentially serious complication of oral anticoagulant treatment. Objectives:To compare the incidence of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding in patients using individual anticoagulants with and without PPI cotherapy, and to determine variation according to underlying gastrointestinal bleeding risk. Design, Setting, and Participants:Retrospective cohort study in Medicare beneficiaries between January 1, 2011, and September 30, 2015. Exposures:Apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin with or without PPI cotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures:Hospitalizations for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding: adjusted incidence and risk difference (RD) per 10?000 person-years of anticoagulant treatment, incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Results:There were 1?643?123 patients with 1?713?183 new episodes of oral anticoagulant treatment included in the cohort (mean [SD] age, 76.4 [2.4] years, 651?427 person-years of follow-up [56.1%] were for women, and the indication was atrial fibrillation for 870?330 person-years [74.9%]). During 754?389 treatment person-years without PPI cotherapy, the adjusted incidence of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding (n?=?7119) was 115 per 10?000 person-years (95% CI, 112-118). The incidence for rivaroxaban (n?=?1278) was 144 per 10?000 person-years (95% CI, 136-152), which was significantly greater than the incidence of hospitalizations for apixaban (n?=?279; 73 per 10?000 person-years; IRR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.73-2.25]; RD, 70.9 [95% CI, 59.1-82.7]), dabigatran (n?=?629; 120 per 10?000 person-years; IRR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.08-1.32]; RD, 23.4 [95% CI, 10.6-36.2]), and warfarin (n?=?4933; 113 per 10?000 person-years; IRR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.19-1.35]; RD, 30.4 [95% CI, 20.3-40.6]). The incidence for apixaban was significantly lower than that for dabigatran (IRR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.52-0.70]; RD, -47.5 [95% CI,-60.6 to -34.3]) and warfarin (IRR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.57-0.73]; RD, -40.5 [95% CI, -50.0 to -31.0]). When anticoagulant treatment with PPI cotherapy (264?447 person-years; 76 per 10?000 person-years) was compared with treatment without PPI cotherapy, risk of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding hospitalizations (n?=?2245) was lower overall (IRR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.62-0.69]) and for apixaban (IRR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.52-0.85]; RD, -24 [95% CI, -38 to -11]), dabigatran (IRR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.41-0.59]; RD, -61.1 [95% CI, -74.8 to -47.4]), rivaroxaban (IRR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.68-0.84]; RD, -35.5 [95% CI, -48.6 to -22.4]), and warfarin (IRR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.62-0.69]; RD, -39.3 [95% CI, -44.5 to -34.2]). Conclusions and Relevance:Among patients initiating oral anticoagulant treatment, incidence of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding was the highest in patients prescribed rivaroxaban, and the lowest for patients prescribed apixaban. For each anticoagulant, the incidence of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding was lower among patients who were receiving PPI cotherapy. These findings may inform assessment of risks and benefits when choosing anticoagulant agents.
| S-EPMC6404233 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are known to reduce the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on oral anticoagulants, and patients are increasingly on oral anticoagulants and PPI co-therapy. However, evidence is lacking on the safety and effectiveness of oral anticoagulants when co-administered with PPIs.MethodsAmong patients initiating oral anticoagulants (warfarin and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants [NOACs], i.e. rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, and edoxaban) during 2013-2017, those concomitantly prescribed PPIs were identified (n = 19,851). The primary endpoint was hospitalization for major upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and secondary endpoints were death and ischemic stroke.ResultsDuring a mean 1.4 years of follow-up, the primary endpoint occurred in 512 (2.58%) patients. Overall, NOACs were associated with lower upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk after adjustment for age, sex, comorbidities and concomitant medications (adjusted hazard ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.65-0.94), compared to warfarin. There was no significant difference in upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk among the individual NOACs. This trend of reduced risk for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in NOACs compared to warfarin was consistent for both regular and reduced doses, throughout bleeding risk groups, and other subgroup analyses. NOACs were also associated with lower risk of death compared to warfarin. The risk for ischemic stroke was not significantly different among the oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.ConclusionIn patients on oral anticoagulant and PPI co-therapy, NOACs were associated with lower risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and mortality compared to warfarin, while there was no difference among the oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention. In patients on PPI therapy, NOACs may preferred over warfarin for decreasing risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and mortality.
| S-EPMC8211274 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10502439 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major burden on the health care system. The average occurrence of venous thromboembolism annually is around 108 per 100,000 person-year. DOACs have transformed treatment of coagulation disorder, and now, it is the leading treatment for stroke prevention in AF and VTE prophylaxis and treatment. For more many years, oral vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) were the drug of choice in managing VTE. VKAs treatment is safe and effective if therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) maintained on the target. However, achieving a stable, therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) can be difficult and challenging in the context of drug and food interactions and liver disorder, resulting in undertreatment which increases the risk of thromboembolism or overtreatment which might cause bleeding. Herein, we provide an overview of DOACs indications, use in specific comorbidities, monitoring parameters, perioperative management, and reversal agents.
| S-EPMC9638657 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundEsophageal eosinophilia can be proton pump inhibitor (PPI) resistant or responsive, representing 2 entities known as eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and PPI-responsive esophageal eosinophilia (PPI-REE), respectively. Although they present with similar clinical features, EoE is accepted to be an antigen-driven, TH2-associated allergic disorder, whereas the cause of PPI-REE remains a mystery.ObjectiveIn this study, our aim was to investigate the pathogenesis of PPI-REE by using a recently described EoE diagnostic panel (EDP) composed of a set of 94 esophageal transcripts and to determine whether PPI therapy reverses any esophageal transcriptional abnormalities.MethodsWe evaluated the EDP signature in biopsy samples obtained from adult and pediatric patients with PPI-REE from 4 institutions and compared the pre- and post-PPI therapy expression profiles of these subjects with those of patients with active EoE.ResultsThe EDP differentiated patients with EoE from control subjects with 100% accuracy among the 4 clinical sites. Bioinformatics analysis revealed largely overlapping transcriptomes between patients with PPI-REE and those with EoE, including the genes for eosinophil chemotaxis (eotaxin 3, CCL26), barrier molecules (desmoglein 1, DSG1), tissue remodeling (periostin, POSTN), and mast cells (carboxypeptidase A, CPA3). PPI monotherapy alone almost completely reversed the allergic inflammatory transcriptome of patients with PPI-REE. Furthermore, we identified a set of candidate genes to differentiate patients with EoE from those with PPI-REE before treatment.ConclusionThese findings provide definitive evidence that PPI-REE is a disease entity with significant molecular overlap with EoE, suggesting that many patients with PPI-REE represent a continuum of the same pathogenic allergic mechanisms that underlie EoE and thus might constitute a subphenotype of patients with EoE. The ability of PPI therapy to nearly entirely reverse gene expression associated with PPI-REE, particularly that associated with classic features of allergic inflammation, provides new insight into potential disease etiology and management strategies for patients with significant esophageal eosinophilia.
| S-EPMC4289084 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) reliably suppress gastric acid secretion and are therefore the first-line treatment for gastric acid-related disorders. Hypomagnesemia (serum magnesium [Mg2+ ] <0.7 mmol/L) is a commonly reported side effect of PPIs. Clinical reports demonstrate that urinary Mg2+ excretion is low in PPI users with hypomagnesemia, suggesting a compensatory mechanism by the kidney for malabsorption of Mg2+ in the intestines. However, the exact mechanism by which PPIs cause impaired Mg2+ absorption is still unknown. In this review, we show that current experimental evidence points toward reduced Mg2+ solubility in the intestinal lumen. Moreover, the absorption pathways in both the small intestine and the colon may be reduced by changes in the expression and activity of key transporter proteins. Additionally, the gut microbiome may contribute to the development of PPI-induced hypomagnesemia, as PPI use affects the composition of the gut microbiome. In this review, we argue that the increase of the luminal pH during PPI treatment may contribute to several of these mechanisms. Considering the fact that bacterial fermentation of dietary fibers results in luminal acidification, we propose that targeting the gut microbiome using dietary intervention might be a promising treatment strategy to restore hypomagnesemia in PPI users.
| S-EPMC9539870 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used as a supplement to cancer therapy. Yet, their effect on cancer mortality is largely unknown. Using data from Danish nationwide registries and Cox models regressing of both propensity scores and drug use, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cancer-specific and noncancer death among PPI users (≥2 prescriptions within six months after diagnosis; n = 36,066) compared with nonusers (<2 prescriptions, n = 311,853) or users of histamine H2 -receptor antagonists (H2 RA; n = 5,152). Adjusted HRs for cancer-specific mortality among postdiagnostic PPI users as compared with nonusers or H2 RA users were 1.29 (95% CI, 1.27-1.32) and 1.15 (95% CI, 1.10-1.20), respectively. HRs for cancer mortality associated with PPI use were highest for ovarian (1.35; 95% CI, 1.20-1.52) and lowest for esophageal cancer (0.91; 95% CI, 0.81-1.04). The associations were stronger among new PPI users after cancer diagnosis, indicating potential confounding. To test the effect of PPIs on tumor growth in a model system free for confounding factors, we investigated the effect of pantoprazole on tumor growth in mice. Pantoprazole (5 mg/kg/day) enhanced tumor growth (p = 0.033) and reduced the antitumor activity of gemcitabine (p = 0.008) in fibrosarcoma-bearing Balb/c mice, but not in immunodeficient Balb/c nude mice. In breast carcinoma-bearing FVB/N mice, pantoprazole had no effect on tumor growth alone but it reduced the life-prolonging effect of doxorubicin significantly (p = 0.007). Taken together, these data raise concerns about the increasing use of PPIs and calls for further studies addressing their safety among cancer patients.
| S-EPMC7611279 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background:Several studies have suggested that proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use is associated with adverse renal outcomes, but obvious evidence for this association is lacking. We investigated the association between PPI use and adverse renal outcomes in patients who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods:Of the 1,284 patients hospitalized for percutaneous coronary intervention between January 2007 and May 2012, 934 patients with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate greater than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were enrolled. Multivariable Cox models were used to examine whether PPI use was associated with acute and chronic adverse renal outcomes. Results:In adjusted time-dependent Cox models, PPI use was associated with acute kidney injury (hazard ratio [HR], 1.46; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.05-2.02), especially in patients aged 65 years or younger (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.09 3.96) or in patients with diabetes (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.23-3.25). In multivariable Cox models, the association between duration of PPI use and chronic kidney disease development was not statistically significant (HR of heavy users, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.61-3.67), but a longer duration of PPI use was associated with mild renal progression in patients younger than 65 years (HR of heavy users, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.09-4.60). Conclusion:Our results suggest that PPI use increases the risk of AKI development, and that PPI use is more significantly associated with acute and chronic renal injuries in younger patients.
| S-EPMC5875577 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveProton pump inhibitor (PPI) use has been associated with reduced diversity of the gut microbiome and may lead to worse clinical outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to evaluate whether PPI use affects clinical outcomes in a real-world setting.DesignHealthcare claims data of adult IBD patients were obtained from the IBM MarketScan Database. Multivariable analysis and propensity score-matched analysis were performed to assess associations between PPI use and new biologic start, and IBD-related hospitalizations and surgeries.ResultsA total of 46,234 IBD patients were identified (6,488 (14%) and 39,746 (86%) patients with and without PPI, respectively). Patients on PPI were more likely to be older, female, and smokers and less likely to be on immunomodulators. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that PPI use was associated with new biologic start (odds ratio (OR) 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.18), and IBD-related admissions (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.74-2.19) and surgeries (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.26-1.71). Following propensity score matching, patients on PPI remained more likely to start a new biologic (23% vs 21%, p = 0.011), and have IBD-related admissions (8% vs 4%, p < 0.001) and surgeries (4% vs 2%, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses stratified by age, smoking, and glucocorticoid use showed similar results. There was a dose-response relationship between the number of PPI prescriptions and the risk of new biologic use (p < 0.001) and IBD-related admissions (p < 0.001).ConclusionPPI use was associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with IBD in the real-world setting. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings, but caution may be needed when prescribing a PPI to IBD patients.Study highlights WHAT IS KNOWNProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most prescribed therapies in the United States (US).Reduction of gastric acid secretion by PPI use increases the risk of imbalance in gut microbiota composition and may increase the risk of enteric infections.Recent studies have reported that the use of PPI was associated with development of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and reduced rates of remission in patients on infliximab therapy, which may be due to alterations of intestinal microbiota.WHAT IS NEW HEREIn a large real-world US healthcare database study, IBD patients with PPI use were more likely to have a new biologic medication started, have an IBD-related surgery, and have an IBD-related hospitalization, which remained significant after adjusting for confounders by multivariable analysis, propensity-score matched analysis, and subgroup analysis.Appropriate clinical review of PPI necessity may need to be performed in patients with IBD when considering prescribing a PPI or who are already on PPI therapy.
| S-EPMC10124315 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background:Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are indicated for prevention of stroke and embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). These agents have been shown to be non-inferior to warfarin in terms of efficacy and safety. However, their uptake in practice has been variable, and prescribed dosages may be inconsistent with manufacturer recommendations. Objectives:To evaluate patterns of oral anticoagulant use in patients with NVAF, including determination of patient characteristics associated with the prescribing of warfarin or DOACs and whether prescribed dosages of DOACs were concordant with manufacturer recommendations. Methods:This retrospective chart review was conducted from April to September 2017 at Abbotsford Regional Hospital, Abbotsford, British Columbia. Patients at least 18 years of age with NVAF and CHADS-65 score of 1 or higher were included. Patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulants, those with reversible atrial fibrillation, and those undergoing renal dialysis were excluded. The dosage of DOACs was categorized as too low, too high, or correct in relation to manufacturer recommendations for the Canadian product. Results:A total of 120 patients were included. At discharge, 83 (69%) of the patients had a prescription for DOAC, 25 (21%) had a prescription for warfarin, and 12 (10%) had no prescription for an oral anticoagulant. There were no statistically significant differences between the warfarin and DOAC groups with respect to patient characteristics. Among the 56 patients for whom a full DOAC dose was indicated, 7 (13%) received a dose that was too low. Among the 23 patients for whom a full DOAC dose was not indicated, 4 (17%) received a dose that was too high. Conclusions:At the study hospital, most patients with NVAF and CHADS-65 score of at least 1 had a discharge prescription for DOAC. Patient characteristics appeared to be similar between the warfarin and DOAC groups. For a notable proportion of patients who received a DOAC, the dosage was incorrect. Appropriate prescribing of oral anticoagulants could be further improved by education for prescribers and involvement of hospital pharmacists.
| S-EPMC6910852 | biostudies-literature