Dataset Information

Magnetic Resonance Elastography-derived Stiffness Predicts Renal Function Loss and Is Associated With Microvascular Inflammation in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Organ stiffening can be caused by inflammation and fibrosis, processes that are common causes of transplant kidney dysfunction. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a contrast-free, noninvasive imaging modality that measures kidney stiffness. The objective of this study was to assess the ability of MRE to serve as a prognostic factor for renal outcomes.

Methods

Patients were recruited from the St Michael's Hospital Kidney Transplant Clinic. Relevant baseline demographic, clinical, and Banff histologic information, along with follow-up estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) data, were recorded. Two-dimensional gradient-echo MRE imaging was performed to obtain kidney "stiffness" maps. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to examine for relationships between stiffness and microvascular inflammation score. Linear mixed-effects modeling was used to assess the relationship between stiffness and eGFR change over time controlling for other baseline variables. A G²-likelihood ratio Chi-squared test was performed to compare between the baseline models with and without "stiffness."

Results

Sixty-eight transplant kidneys were scanned in 66 patients (mean age 56 ± 12 y, 24 females), with 38 allografts undergoing a contemporaneous biopsy. Mean transplant vintage was 7.0 ± 6.8 y. In biopsied allografts, MRE-derived allograft stiffness was associated only with microvascular inflammation (Banff g + ptc score, Spearman ρ = 0.43, P = 0.01), but no other histologic parameters. Stiffness was negatively associated with eGFR change over time (Stiffness × Time interaction β = -0.80, P < 0.0001), a finding that remained significant even when adjusted for biopsy status and baseline variables (Stiffness × Time interaction β = -0.46, P = 0.04). Conversely, the clinical models including "stiffness" showed significantly better fit (P = 0.04) compared with the baseline clinical models without "stiffness."

Conclusions

MRE-derived renal stiffness provides important prognostic information regarding renal function loss for patients with allograft dysfunction, over and above what is provided by current clinical variables.

SUBMITTER: Shatil AS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9197345 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Fibrosis is a major cause of kidney allograft injury. Currently, the only means of assessing allograft fibrosis is by biopsy, an invasive procedure that samples <1% of the kidney. We examined whether magnetic resonance elastography, an imaging-based measure of organ stiffness, could noninvasively estimate allograft fibrosis and predict progression of allograft dysfunction. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS:Kidney allograft recipients >1 year post-transplant undergoing an allograft biopsy first underwent free-breathing, flow-compensated magnetic resonance elastography on a 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Each patient had serial eGFR measurements after the elastography scan for a follow-up period of up to 1 year. The mean stiffness value of the kidney allograft was compared with both the histopathologic Banff fibrosis score and the rate of eGFR change during the follow-up period. RESULTS:Sixteen patients who underwent magnetic resonance elastography and biopsy were studied (mean age: 54±9 years old). Whole-kidney mean stiffness ranged between 3.5 and 7.3 kPa. Whole-kidney stiffness correlated with biopsy-derived Banff fibrosis score (Spearman rho =0.67; P<0.01). Stiffness was heterogeneously distributed within each kidney, providing a possible explanation for the lack of a stronger stiffness-fibrosis correlation. We also found negative correlations between whole-kidney stiffness and both baseline eGFR (Spearman rho =-0.65; P<0.01) and eGFR change over time (Spearman rho =-0.70; P<0.01). Irrespective of the baseline eGFR, increased kidney stiffness was associated with a greater eGFR decline (regression r2=0.48; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS:Given the limitations of allograft biopsy, our pilot study suggests the potential for magnetic resonance elastography as a novel noninvasive measure of whole-allograft fibrosis burden that may predict future changes in kidney function. Future studies exploring the utility and accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography are needed.