Dataset Information

Optimal Device and Regimen of Nasal Saline Treatment for Sinonasal Diseases: Systematic Review.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

This review aimed to systematically determine the optimal nasal saline regimen for different types of sinonasal diseases.

Data sources

PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov. The last search was on December 6, 2021.

Review methods

Study selection was done by 2 independent authors. Randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses were included. The effects of nasal saline treatment through various devices, saline tonicities, and buffer statuses were evaluated in patients with allergic and nonallergic rhinitis, acute and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), CRS with cystic fibrosis, and postoperative care, including septoplasty/turbinoplasty and endoscopic sinus surgery.

Results

Sixty-nine studies were included: 10 meta-analyses and 59 randomized controlled trials. For allergic rhinitis, large-volume devices (≥60 mL) were effective for treating adults, while low-volume devices (5-59 mL) were effective for children. Isotonic saline was preferred over hypertonic saline due to fewer adverse events. For acute rhinosinusitis, saline irrigation was beneficial in children, but it was an option for adults. Large-volume devices were more effective, especially in the common cold subgroup. For CRS, large-volume devices were effective for adults, but saline drop was the only regimen that had available data in children. Buffered isotonic saline was more tolerable than nonbuffered or hypertonic saline. The data for CRS with cystic fibrosis and nonallergic rhinitis were limited. For postoperative care, buffered isotonic saline delivered by large-volume devices was effective.

Conclusion

Nasal saline treatment is recommended for treating most sinonasal diseases. Optimal delivery methods for each condition should be considered to achieve therapeutic effects of saline treatment.

SUBMITTER: Chitsuthipakorn W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9201324 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Apr-Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Optimal Device and Regimen of Nasal Saline Treatment for Sinonasal Diseases: Systematic Review.

Chitsuthipakorn Wirach W Kanjanawasee Dichapong D Hoang Minh P MP Seresirikachorn Kachorn K Snidvongs Kornkiat K

OTO open 20220401 2

<h4>Objective</h4>This review aimed to systematically determine the optimal nasal saline regimen for different types of sinonasal diseases.<h4>Data sources</h4>PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov. The last search was on December 6, 2021.<h4>Review methods</h4>Study selection was done by 2 independent authors. Randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses were included. The effects of nasal saline treatment through various devices, saline tonicities, and ...[more]

PMID: 35720767

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Hyaluronic acid (HA), the main component of the extracellular matrix, has the ability to promote tissue repair and regulate inflammation. It is used in otolaryngology as an adjuvant treatment to alleviate postoperative nasal symptoms. However, there is currently insufficient evidence demonstrating the therapeutic efficacy of HA for patients with nasal inflammatory diseases (NIDs). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical HA in the treatment of NID patients without receiving surgery. Methods: In this meta-analysis, comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science. Keywords searched included "hyaluronic acid," "sinusitis," "allergic rhinitis," "rhinitis," and "randomized controlled trials (RCTs)." The Cochrane Collaboration's "Risk of Bias Assessment" tool was used to assess the quality of the included trials, and the meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 and STATA 15 statistical software. Results: A total of 11 articles and 825 participants were enrolled. For the primary outcomes, the pooled results revealed that HA significantly improves nasal obstruction (SMD, -0.53; 95% CI, -0.92 to -0.14; p = 0.008; and I2 = 79%) and rhinorrhea (SMD, -0.71; 95% CI, -1.27 to -0.15; p = 0.01; and I2 = 90%) in patients with NIDs. As for the secondary outcomes, the pooled results demonstrated that when compared with the control group, HA could significantly improve nasal endoscopic scores (p < 0.05), rhinitis scores (p < 0.05), rhinomanometry (p < 0.05), nasal neutrophils (p < 0.05), and mucociliary clearance (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding nasal itching, sneezing, hyposmia, quality-of-life scores, and nasal eosinophils. For the risk of bias, 54.5% and 45.5% of trials had a low risk of bias in the randomization process and deviation of the intended intervention, respectively. Conclusion: In the present study, the results reveal that HA might ameliorate symptoms of patients with NIDs. However, more clinical trials with larger participant cohorts are required to confirm this result. Systematic review registration number: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier CRD42023414539.

Project description:(1) Background: SMARCB1 (INI-1)-deficient sinonasal carcinoma is a rare sinonasal malignancy; since its discovery and description in 2014, less than 200 cases have been identified. It is almost impossible to perform randomized-controlled trials on novel therapy to improve treatment outcomes in view of its rarity. We performed a systematic review of all the published case reports/series and included our patients for survival analysis. (2) Methods: In this systematic review, we searched from PubMed-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Google Scholar for individual patient data to identify and retrieve all reported SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma. Clarification on treatment details and the most updated survival outcomes from all authors of the published case reports/series were attempted. Survival analysis for overall survival (OS) and identification of OS prognostic factors were performed. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022306671). (3) Results: A total of 67 publications were identified from the systematic review and literature search. After excluding other ineligible and duplicated publications, 192 patients reported were considered appropriate for further review. After excluding duplicates and patients with incomplete pretreatment details and survival outcomes, 120 patients were identified to have a complete set of data including baseline demographics, treatment details, and survival outcomes. Together with 8 patients treated in our institution, 128 patients were included into survival analysis. After a median follow up of 17.5 months (range 0.3-149.0), 50 (46.3%) patients died. The 1-year, 2-year and 3-year OS rates were 84.3% (95% CI % 77.6-91.0), 62.9% (95% CI 53.1-72.7), and 51.8% (95% CI 40.8-62.8), respectively, and the median OS was 39.0 months (95% CI 28.5-49.5). Males (p = 0.029) and T4b disease (p = 0.013) were significant OS prognostic factors in univariable analysis, while only T4b disease (p = 0.017) remained significant in multivariable analysis. (4) Conclusions: SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma is an extremely aggressive sinonasal malignancy with a dismal prognosis. Early diagnosis and a multimodality treatment strategy are essential for a better treatment and survival outcome.

Project description:Acute bronchiolitis is the commonest cause of hospitalisation in infancy. Currently management consists of supportive care and oxygen. A Cochrane review concluded that, "nebulised 3 % saline may significantly reduce the length of hospital stay". We conducted a systematic review of controlled trials of nebulised hypertonic saline (HS) for infants hospitalised with primary acute bronchiolitis.Searches to January 2015 involved: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; Ovid MEDLINE; Embase; Google Scholar; Web of Science; and, a variety of trials registers. We hand searched Chest, Paediatrics and Journal of Paediatrics on 14 January 2015. Reference lists of eligible trial publications were checked. Randomised or quasi-randomised trials which compared HS versus either normal saline (+/- adjunct treatment) or no treatment were included. Eligible studies involved children less than 2 years old hospitalised due to the first episode of acute bronchiolitis. Two reviewers extracted data to calculate mean differences (MD) and 95 % Confidence Intervals (CIs) for length of hospital stay (LoS-primary outcome), Clinical Severity Score (CSS) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). Meta-analysis was undertaken using a fixed effect model, supplemented with additional sensitivity analyses. We investigated statistical heterogeneity using I(2). Risk of bias, within and between studies, was assessed using the Cochrane tool, an outcome reporting bias checklist and a funnel plot.Fifteen trials were included in the systematic review (n?=?1922), HS reduced mean LoS by 0.36, (95 % CI 0.50 to 0.22) days, but with considerable heterogeneity (I(2)?=?78 %) and sensitivity to alternative analysis methods. A reduction in CSS was observed where assessed [n?=?516; MD -1.36, CI -1.52, -1.20]. One trial reported one possible intervention related SAE, no other studies described intervention related SAEs.There is disparity between the overall combined effect on LoS as compared with the negative results from the largest and most precise trials. Together with high levels of heterogeneity, this means that neither individual trials nor pooled estimates provide a firm evidence-base for routine use of HS in inpatient acute bronchiolitis.

Project description:BackgroundChronic sinonasal disease is common in asthmatic patients and associated with poor asthma control; however, there are no long-term trials addressing whether chronic treatment of sinonasal disease improves asthma control.ObjectiveWe sought to determine whether treatment of chronic sinonasal disease with nasal corticosteroids improves asthma control, as measured by the Childhood Asthma Control Test and Asthma Control Test in children and adults, respectively.MethodsA 24-week multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of placebo versus nasal mometasone in adults and children with inadequately controlled asthma was performed. Treatments were randomly assigned, with concealment of allocation.ResultsTwo hundred thirty-seven adults and 151 children were randomized to nasal mometasone versus placebo, and 319 participants completed the study. There was no difference in the Childhood Asthma Control Test score (difference in change with mometasone - change with placebo [ΔM - ΔP], -0.38; 95% CI, -2.19 to 1.44; P = .68; age 6-11 years) or the Asthma Control Test score (ΔM - ΔP, 0.51; 95% CI, -0.46 to 1.48; P = .30; age ≥12 years) in those assigned to mometasone versus placebo. In children and adolescents (age 6-17 years) there was no difference in asthma or sinus symptoms but a decrease in episodes of poorly controlled asthma defined by a decrease in peak flow. In adults there was a small difference in asthma symptoms measured by using the Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ΔM - ΔP, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.11; P < .01) and in nasal symptoms (sinus symptom score ΔM - ΔP, -3.82; 95% CI, -7.19 to -0.45; P = .03) but no difference in asthma quality of life, lung function, or episodes of poorly controlled asthma in adults assigned to mometasone versus placebo.ConclusionsTreatment of chronic sinonasal disease with nasal corticosteroids for 24 weeks does not improve asthma control. Treatment of sinonasal disease in asthmatic patients should be determined by the need to treat sinonasal disease rather than to improve asthma control.

Dataset Information

Optimal Device and Regimen of Nasal Saline Treatment for Sinonasal Diseases: Systematic Review.

Objective

Data sources

Review methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Optimal Device and Regimen of Nasal Saline Treatment for Sinonasal Diseases: Systematic Review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets