Dataset Information

Risk factors for bleeding after dental extractions in patients receiving antithrombotic drugs - A case control study.

ABSTRACT:

Background/purpose

Patients receiving antithrombotic drugs are more likely to suffer bleeding after tooth extraction and multiple factors are related to it. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of bleeding and risk factors for bleeding after dental extractions in patients receiving antithrombotic drugs.

Materials and methods

This retrospective case control study included patients receiving oral antithrombotic drugs or not. Tooth extractions were conducted under ECG monitoring and local hemostatic measures were performed. Risk factors for postoperative hemorrhage after tooth extraction were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Bleeding events were reported in 27 (27%) patients receiving antithrombotic drugs and 9 (9%) patients who didn't use antithrombotic drugs, the difference between which was significant (p < 0.01). Univariate analyses showed that age (OR = 2.717, p = 0.028), oral hygiene (OR = 4.110, p = 0.043), inferior nerve block (OR = 4.285, p = 0.038) and number of extracted tooth (OR = 4.758, p = 0.029) were significantly correlate with bleeding incidence. Multivariate analysis revealed that age (OR = 2.824, p = 0.036) and number of extracted tooth (OR = 5.268, p = 0.016) were significant risk factors for postextraction bleeding.

Conclusion

The results suggest that there is higher incidence of postextraction bleeding in patients receiving antithrombotic drugs compared to patients who don't. Age (>75 years), oral hygiene, inferior nerve block and number of extracted tooth may be related to bleeding after tooth extraction.

SUBMITTER: Huang J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9201513 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Middle gastrointestinal bleeding (MGIB) risk has not been fully investigated due to its extremely rare occurrence and the need for multiple endoscopies to exclude upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding. This study investigated whether MGIB is associated with the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), low-dose aspirin (LDA), thienopyridines, anticoagulants, and proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), and whether PPI use affects the interactions between MGIB and antithrombotic drugs.In this multicenter, hospital-based, case-control study, 400 patients underwent upper and lower endoscopy, 80 had acute overt MGIB and 320 had no bleeding and were matched for age and sex as controls (1:4). MGIB was additionally evaluated by capsule and/or double-balloon endoscopy, after excluding upper and lower GI bleeding. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) for MGIB risk were calculated using conditional logistic regression. To estimate the propensity score, we employed a logistic regression model for PPI use.In patients with MGIB, mean hemoglobin level was 9.4 g/dL, and 28 patients (35%) received blood transfusions. Factors significantly associated with MGIB were chronic kidney disease (p<0.001), liver cirrhosis (p = 0.034), NSAIDs (p<0.001), thienopyridines (p<0.001), anticoagulants (p = 0.002), and PPIs (p<0.001). After adjusting for these factors, NSAIDs (AOR, 2.5; p = 0.018), thienopyridines (AOR, 3.2; p = 0.015), anticoagulants (AOR, 4.3; p = 0.028), and PPIs (AOR; 2.0; p = 0.021) were independently associated with MGIB. After adjusting for propensity score, the use of PPIs remained an independent risk factors for MGIB (AOR, 1.94; p = 0.034). No significant interactions were observed between PPIs and NSAIDs (AOR, 0.7; p = 0.637), LDA (AOR, 0.3; p = 0.112), thienopyridine (AOR, 0.7, p = 0.671), or anticoagulants (AOR, 0.5; p = 0.545).One-third of patients with acute small intestinal bleeding required blood transfusion. NSAIDs, thienopyridines, anticoagulants, and PPIs increased the risk of acute small intestinal bleeding. However, there were no significant interactions found between antithrombotic drugs and PPI use for bleeding risk.

Project description:IntroductionHaemato-oncological patients often receive platelet count driven prophylactic platelet transfusions to prevent bleeding. However, many prophylactically transfused patients still bleed. More knowledge on risk factors for bleeding is therefore needed. This will enable identification of bleeding risk profiles on which future transfusion policy can be optimised. The present BITE study (Bleeding In Thrombocytopenia Explained) aims to identify clinical conditions and biomarkers that are associated with clinically relevant bleeding events.Methods and analysisA matched case-control study nested in a cohort of haemato-oncological patients in the Netherlands. We collect a limited number of variables from all eligible patients, who together form the source population. These patients are followed for the occurrence of clinically relevant bleeding. Consenting patients of the source population form the cohort. Cases from the cohort are frequency matched to selected control patients for the nested case-control study. Of both case and control patients more detailed clinical data is collected.Study populationAdult haemato-oncological patients, who are admitted for intensive chemotherapeutic treatment or stem cell transplantation, or who received such treatments in the past and are readmitted for disease or treatment-related adverse events.Statistical analysisBleeding incidences will be calculated for the total source population, as well as for different subgroups. The association between potential risk factors and the occurrence of bleeding will be analysed using conditional logistic regression, to account for matching of case and control patients.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee Leiden Den Haag and Delft, and the Radboudumc Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects. Approval in seven other centres is foreseen. Patients will be asked for written informed consent and data is coded before analyses, according to Dutch privacy law. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNL62499.058.17. NCT03505086; Pre-results.

Project description:The majority of patients with severe aortic stenosis are recommended intervention with a surgical biological prosthesis (bioSAVR) or a transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI). The antithrombotic strategies after aortic valve intervention vary and include drugs targeting both platelets and the coagulation cascade. Long-term exposure and changes of antithrombotic treatment influence the risk of both bleeding and thromboembolic events.The aim was to describe an unselected sample of patients who have experienced haemorrhagic stroke and other major bleeding events after biological aortic prosthesis, their antithrombotic treatment and changes of treatments in relation to the bleeding event.All patients performing an bioSAVR or a TAVI 2008-2014 were identified in the SWEDEHEART registry and included in the study (n?=?10?711). The outcome events were haemorrhagic stroke and other major bleeding event. Information of drug exposure was collected from the dispensed drug registry.The incidence rate of any bleeding event was 2.85/100 patient-years the first year after aortic valve intervention. Heart failure and atrial fibrillation were present more often in patients with a first haemorrhagic stroke or other major bleeding event compared to without. The proportion of exposure to warfarin was 28.7% vs. 21.3% in patients with and without a haemorrhagic stroke. Comparable figures were 31.2% vs. 19.0% in patients with and without other major bleeding event. During 1 month prior a haemorrhagic stroke or other major bleeding event 39.4% and 38.0%, respectively, of the patients not previously exposed to antithrombotic treatment started warfarin or single antiplatelet therapy.Major bleeding events are not uncommon after aortic valve intervention with a biological prosthesis. Evaluation of comorbidities and previous bleeding might improve risk stratification for bleeding in these elderly patients. The pattern of change of antithrombotic treatment was similar in the groups with and without a bleeding event and in most patients the antithrombotic regime was unchanged the month before an event.