Dataset Information

Pharmacological Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: From Bench to Bedside.

ABSTRACT: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), the most common inherited heart disease, is still orphan of a specific drug treatment. The erroneous consideration of HCM as a rare disease has hampered the design and conduct of large, randomized trials in the last 50 years, and most of the indications in the current guidelines are derived from small non-randomized studies, case series, or simply from the consensus of experts. Guideline-directed therapy of HCM includes non-selective drugs such as disopyramide, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, or β-adrenergic receptor blockers, mainly used in patients with symptomatic obstruction of the outflow tract. Following promising preclinical studies, several drugs acting on potential HCM-specific targets were tested in patients. Despite the huge efforts, none of these studies was able to change clinical practice for HCM patients, because tested drugs were proven to be scarcely effective or hardly tolerated in patients. However, novel compounds have been developed in recent years specifically for HCM, addressing myocardial hypercontractility and altered energetics in a direct manner, through allosteric inhibition of myosin. In this paper, we will critically review the use of different classes of drugs in HCM patients, starting from "old" established agents up to novel selective drugs that have been recently trialed in patients.

SUBMITTER: Palandri C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9209358 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Pharmacological Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: From Bench to Bedside.

Palandri Chiara C Santini Lorenzo L Argirò Alessia A Margara Francesca F Doste Ruben R Bueno-Orovio Alfonso A Olivotto Iacopo I Coppini Raffaele R

Drugs 20220613 8

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), the most common inherited heart disease, is still orphan of a specific drug treatment. The erroneous consideration of HCM as a rare disease has hampered the design and conduct of large, randomized trials in the last 50 years, and most of the indications in the current guidelines are derived from small non-randomized studies, case series, or simply from the consensus of experts. Guideline-directed therapy of HCM includes non-selective drugs such as disopyramide, ...[more]

PMID: 35696053

Similar Datasets

Project description:This review of vasopressin in septic shock differs from previous reviews by providing more information on the physiology and pathophysiology of vasopressin and vasopressin receptors, particularly because of recent interest in more specific AVPR1a agonists and new information from the Vasopressin and Septic Shock Trial (VASST), a randomized trial of vasopressin versus norepinephrine in septic shock. Relevant literature regarding vasopressin and other AVPR1a agonists was reviewed and synthesized. Vasopressin, a key stress hormone in response to hypotension, stimulates a family of receptors: AVPR1a, AVPR1b, AVPR2, oxytocin receptors and purinergic receptors. Rationales for use of vasopressin in septic shock are as follows: first, a deficiency of vasopressin in septic shock; second, low-dose vasopressin infusion improves blood pressure, decreases requirements for norepinephrine and improves renal function; and third, a recent randomized, controlled, concealed trial of vasopressin versus norepinephrine (VASST) suggests low-dose vasopressin may decrease mortality of less severe septic shock. Previous clinical studies of vasopressin in septic shock were small or not controlled. There was no difference in 28-day mortality between vasopressin-treated versus norepinephrine-treated patients (35% versus 39%, respectively) in VASST. There was potential benefit in the prospectively defined stratum of patients with less severe septic shock (5 to 14 μg/minute norepinephrine at randomization): vasopressin may have lowered mortality compared with norepinephrine (26% versus 36%, respectively, P = 0.04 within stratum). The result was robust: vasopressin also decreased mortality (compared with norepinephrine) if less severe septic shock was defined by the lowest quartile of arterial lactate or by use of one (versus more than one) vasopressor at baseline. Other investigators found greater hemodynamic effects of higher dose of vasopressin (0.06 units/minute) but also unique adverse effects (elevated liver enzymes and serum bilirubin). Use of higher dose vasopressin requires further evaluation of efficacy and safety. There are very few studies of interactions of therapies in critical care--or septic shock--and effects on mortality. Therefore, the interaction of vasopressin infusion, corticosteroid treatment and mortality of septic shock was evaluated in VASST. Low-dose vasopressin infusion plus corticosteroids significantly decreased 28-day mortality compared with corticosteroids plus norepinephrine (44% versus 35%, respectively, P = 0.03; P = 0.008 interaction statistic). Prospective randomized controlled trials would be necessary to confirm this interesting interaction. In conclusion, low-dose vasopressin may be effective in patients who have less severe septic shock already receiving norepinephrine (such as patients with modest norepinephrine infusion (5 to 15 μg/minute) or low serum lactate levels). The interaction of vasopressin infusion and corticosteroid treatment in septic shock requires further study.

Dataset Information

Pharmacological Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: From Bench to Bedside.

Publications

Pharmacological Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: From Bench to Bedside.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets