Dataset Information

Machine learning-guided evaluation of extraction and simulation methods for cancer patient-specific metabolic models.

ABSTRACT: Genome-scale metabolic model (GEM) has been established as an important tool to study cellular metabolism at a systems level by predicting intracellular fluxes. With the advent of generic human GEMs, they have been increasingly applied to a range of diseases, often for the objective of predicting effective metabolic drug targets. Cancer is a representative disease where the use of GEMs has proved to be effective, partly due to the massive availability of patient-specific RNA-seq data. When using a human GEM, so-called context-specific GEM needs to be developed first by using cell-specific RNA-seq data. Biological validity of a context-specific GEM highly depends on both model extraction method (MEM) and model simulation method (MSM). However, while MEMs have been thoroughly examined, MSMs have not been systematically examined, especially, when studying cancer metabolism. In this study, the effects of pairwise combinations of three MEMs and five MSMs were evaluated by examining biological features of the resulting cancer patient-specific GEMs. For this, a total of 1,562 patient-specific GEMs were reconstructed, and subjected to machine learning-guided and biological evaluations to draw robust conclusions. Noteworthy observations were made from the evaluation, including the high performance of two MEMs, namely rank-based 'task-driven Integrative Network Inference for Tissues' (tINIT) or 'Gene Inactivity Moderated by Metabolism and Expression' (GIMME), paired with least absolute deviation (LAD) as a MSM, and relatively poorer performance of flux balance analysis (FBA) and parsimonious FBA (pFBA). Insights from this study can be considered as a reference when studying cancer metabolism using patient-specific GEMs.

SUBMITTER: Lee SM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9218235 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:MR imaging-based modeling of tumor cell density can substantially improve targeted treatment of glioblastoma. Unfortunately, interpatient variability limits the predictive ability of many modeling approaches. We present a transfer learning method that generates individualized patient models, grounded in the wealth of population data, while also detecting and adjusting for interpatient variabilities based on each patient's own histologic data. MATERIALS AND METHODS:We recruited patients with primary glioblastoma undergoing image-guided biopsies and preoperative imaging, including contrast-enhanced MR imaging, dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging, and diffusion tensor imaging. We calculated relative cerebral blood volume from DSC-MR imaging and mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy from DTI. Following image coregistration, we assessed tumor cell density for each biopsy and identified corresponding localized MR imaging measurements. We then explored a range of univariate and multivariate predictive models of tumor cell density based on MR imaging measurements in a generalized one-model-fits-all approach. We then implemented both univariate and multivariate individualized transfer learning predictive models, which harness the available population-level data but allow individual variability in their predictions. Finally, we compared Pearson correlation coefficients and mean absolute error between the individualized transfer learning and generalized one-model-fits-all models. RESULTS:Tumor cell density significantly correlated with relative CBV (r = 0.33, P < .001), and T1-weighted postcontrast (r = 0.36, P < .001) on univariate analysis after correcting for multiple comparisons. With single-variable modeling (using relative CBV), transfer learning increased predictive performance (r = 0.53, mean absolute error = 15.19%) compared with one-model-fits-all (r = 0.27, mean absolute error = 17.79%). With multivariate modeling, transfer learning further improved performance (r = 0.88, mean absolute error = 5.66%) compared with one-model-fits-all (r = 0.39, mean absolute error = 16.55%). CONCLUSIONS:Transfer learning significantly improves predictive modeling performance for quantifying tumor cell density in glioblastoma.

Project description:BackgroundLogistic regression-based signal detection algorithms have benefits over disproportionality analysis due to their ability to handle potential confounders and masking factors. Feature exploration and developing alternative machine learning algorithms can further strengthen signal detection.ObjectivesOur objective was to compare the signal detection performance of logistic regression, gradient-boosted trees, random forest and support vector machine models utilizing Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system data.DesignCross-sectional study.MethodsThe quarterly data extract files from 1 October 2017 through 31 December 2020 were downloaded. Due to an imbalanced outcome, two training sets were used: one stratified on the outcome variable and another using Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE). A crude model and a model with tuned hyperparameters were developed for each algorithm. Model performance was compared against a reference set using accuracy, precision, F1 score, recall, the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROCAUC), and the precision-recall curve area under the curve (PRCAUC).ResultsModels trained on the balanced training set had higher accuracy, F1 score and recall compared to models trained on the SMOTE training set. When using the balanced training set, logistic regression, gradient-boosted trees, random forest and support vector machine models obtained similar performance evaluation metrics. The gradient-boosted trees hyperparameter tuned model had the highest ROCAUC (0.646) and the random forest crude model had the highest PRCAUC (0.839) when using the balanced training set.ConclusionAll models trained on the balanced training set performed similarly. Logistic regression models had higher accuracy, precision and recall. Logistic regression, random forest and gradient-boosted trees hyperparameter tuned models had a PRCAUC ⩾ 0.8. All models had an ROCAUC ⩾ 0.5. Including both disproportionality analysis results and additional case report information in models resulted in higher performance evaluation metrics than disproportionality analysis alone.

Dataset Information

Machine learning-guided evaluation of extraction and simulation methods for cancer patient-specific metabolic models.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets