Dataset Information

Chemical Process Alarm Root Cause Diagnosis Method Based on the Combination of Data-Knowledge-Driven Method and Time Retrospective Reasoning.

ABSTRACT: Due to the abrupt nature of the chemical process, a large number of alarms are often generated at the same time. As a result of the flood of alarms, it largely hinders the operator from making accurate judgments and correct actions for the root cause of the alarm. The existing diagnosis methods for the root cause of alarms are relatively single, and their ability to accurately find out complex accident chains and assist decision making is weak. This paper introduces a method that integrates the knowledge-driven method and the data-driven method to establish an alarm causal network model and then traces the source to realize the alarm root cause diagnosis, and develops the related system modules. The knowledge-driven method uses the hidden causality in the optimized hazard and operability analysis (HAZOP) report, while the data-driven method combines the autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA) and Granger causality test, and the traceability mechanism uses the time-based retrospective reasoning method. In the case study, the practical application of the method is compared with the experimental application in a real petrochemical plant. The results show that this method helps to improve the accuracy of correct diagnosis of the root cause of the alarm and can assist the operators in decision making. Using this method, the root cause diagnosis of alarm can be realized quickly and scientifically, and the probability of misjudgment by operators can be reduced, which has a certain degree of scientificity.

SUBMITTER: Song X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9219089 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:To successfully learn using open Internet resources, students must be able to critically search, evaluate and select online information, and verify sources. Defined as critical online reasoning (COR), this construct is operationalized on two levels in our study: (1) the student level using the newly developed Critical Online Reasoning Assessment (CORA), and (2) the online information processing level using event log data, including gaze durations and fixations. The written responses of 32 students for one CORA task were scored by three independent raters. The resulting score was operationalized as "task performance," whereas the gaze fixations and durations were defined as indicators of "process performance." Following a person-oriented approach, we conducted a process mining (PM) analysis, as well as a latent class analysis (LCA) to test whether-following the dual-process theory-the undergraduates could be distinguished into two groups based on both their process and task performance. Using PM, the process performance of all 32 students was visualized and compared, indicating two distinct response process patterns. One group of students (11), defined as "strategic information processers," processed online information more comprehensively, as well as more efficiently, which was also reflected in their higher task scores. In contrast, the distributions of the process performance variables for the other group (21), defined as "avoidance information processers," indicated a poorer process performance, which was also reflected in their lower task scores. In the LCA, where two student groups were empirically distinguished by combining the process performance indicators and the task score as a joint discriminant criterion, we confirmed these two COR profiles, which were reflected in high vs. low process and task performances. The estimated parameters indicated that high-performing students were significantly more efficient at conducting strategic information processing, as reflected in their higher process performance. These findings are so far based on quantitative analyses using event log data. To enable a more differentiated analysis of students' visual attention dynamics, more in-depth qualitative research of the identified student profiles in terms of COR will be required.

Project description:BackgroundWith the rapid development of China's chemical industry, although researchers have developed many methods in the field of chemical safety, the situation of chemical safety in China is still not optimistic. How to prevent accidents has always been the focus of scholars' attention.MethodsBased on the characteristics of chemical enterprises and the Heinrich accident triangle, this paper developed the organizational-level accident triangle, which divides accidents into group-level, unit-level, and workshop-level accidents. Based on 484 accident records of a large chemical enterprise in China, the Spearman correlation coefficient was used to analyze the rationality of accident classification and the occurrence rules of accidents at different levels. In addition, this paper used TF-IDF and K-means algorithms to extract keywords and perform text clustering analysis for accidents at different levels based on accident classification. The risk factors of each accident cluster were further analyzed, and improvement measures were proposed for the sample enterprises.ResultsThe results show that reducing unit-level accidents can prevent group-level accidents. The accidents of the sample enterprises are mainly personal injury accidents, production accidents, environmental pollution accidents, and quality accidents. The leading causes of personal injury accidents are employees' unsafe behaviors, such as poor safety awareness, non-standard operation, illegal operation, untimely communication, etc. The leading causes of production accidents, environmental pollution accidents, and quality accidents include the unsafe state of materials, such as equipment damage, pipeline leakage, short-circuiting, excessive fluctuation of process parameters, etc. CONCLUSION: Compared with the traditional accident classification method, the accident triangle proposed in this paper based on the organizational level dramatically reduces the differences between accidents, helps enterprises quickly identify risk factors, and prevents accidents. This method can effectively prevent accidents and provide helpful guidance for the safety management of chemical enterprises.

Dataset Information

Chemical Process Alarm Root Cause Diagnosis Method Based on the Combination of Data-Knowledge-Driven Method and Time Retrospective Reasoning.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets