Dataset Information

Recent-onset atrial fibrillation: a study exploring the elements of Virchow's triad after cardioversion.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Atrial fibrillation (AF) imposes an inherent risk for stroke and silent cerebral emboli, partly related to left atrial (LA) remodeling and activation of inflammatory and coagulation systems. The aim was to explore the effects of cardioversion (CV) and short-lasting AF on left atrial hemodynamics, inflammatory, coagulative and cardiac biomarkers, and the association between LA functional recovery and the presence of a prior history of AF.

Methods

Patients referred for CV within 48 h after AF onset were prospectively included. Echocardiography and blood sampling were performed immediately prior, 1-3 h after, and at 7-10 days after CV. The presence of chronic white matter hyperintensities (WMH) on magnetic resonance imaging was related to biomarker levels.

Results

Forty-three patients (84% males), aged 55±9.6 years, with median CHA₂DS₂-VASc score 1 (IQR 0-1) were included. The LA emptying fraction (LAEF), LA peak longitudinal strain during reservoir, conduit, and contractile phases improved significantly after CV. Only LAEF normalized within 10 days. Interleukin-6, high-sensitivity cardiac-troponin-T (hs-cTNT), N-terminal-pro-brain-natriuretic peptide, prothrombin-fragment 1+2 (PTf1+2), and fibrinogen decreased significantly after CV. There was a trend towards higher C-reactive protein, hs-cTNT, and PTf1+2 levels in patients with WMH (n=21) compared to those without (n=22). At 7-10 days, the LAEF was significantly lower in patients with a prior history of AF versus those without.

Conclusion

Although LA stunning resolved within 10 days, LAEF remained significantly lower in patients with a prior history of AF versus those without. Inflammatory and coagulative biomarkers were higher before CV, but subsided after 7-10 days, which altogether might suggest an enhanced thrombogenicity, even in these low-risk patients.

SUBMITTER: Arvanitis P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9236986 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWhether early pharmacologic cardioversion is necessary for recent-onset atrial fibrillation is still controversial. Current meta-analyses were limited to evaluating the effects within 24 h without sufficient considering longer follow-up outcomes. We aimed to compare the effect of early pharmacologic cardioversion and non-early cardioversion in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation within 4-weeks of follow-up.MethodsWe searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Clinicaltrialsregister. eu for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before November 2021 comparing early pharmacologic cardioversion and non-early cardioversion in recent-onset atrial fibrillation and synthesized data in accordance with PRISMA-Systematic Reviews and Network Meta-Analysis (NMA). Early pharmacological cardioversion referred to immediate cardioversion with antiarrhythmic drugs (i.e., amiodarone, propafenone, flecainide, tedisamil, vernakalant, vanoxerine, and sotalol) upon admission, while non-early cardioversion involved the administration of rate-control or placebo medication without immediate cardioversion.Results16 RCTs with 2,395 patients were included. Compared to non-early cardioversion, a systematic review showed that early pharmacologic cardioversion resulted in a higher probability of sinus rhythm maintenance within 24 h (odds ratios [OR] 2.50, 95% credible interval [CrI] 1.76 to 3.54) and 1-week (2.50, 1.76 to 3.54), however, there was no significant difference in sinus rhythm maintenance within 4-weeks (1.37, 0.90 to 2.09). In subgroup analysis, the Bayesian NMA revealed that vernakalant may be successful in sinus rhythm maintenance within both 24 h (3.55, 2.28 to 5.55) and 1-week (2.72, 1.72 to 4.31). The results were consistent with the frequentist NMA.ConclusionsNon-early pharmacologic cardioversion may not be inferior to early cardioversion within a 4-week follow-up period in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation. The evidence remains insufficient to determine which antiarrhythmic agent is optimal in the longer run. Further high-quality relevant RCTs are necessary.Clinical trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42020166862.