Alchemical Free Energy Calculations to Investigate Protein-Protein Interactions: the Case of the CDC42/PAK1 Complex.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: La Serra MA
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9241073 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Thermal stability of proteins is crucial for both biotechnological and therapeutic applications. Rational protein engineering therefore frequently aims at increasing thermal stability by introducing stabilizing mutations. The accurate prediction of the thermodynamic consequences caused by mutations, however, is highly challenging as thermal stability changes are caused by alterations in the free energy of folding. Growing computational power, however, increasingly allows us to use alchemical free energy simulations, such as free energy perturbation or thermodynamic integration, to calculate free energy differences with relatively high accuracy. In this article, we present an automated protocol for setting up alchemical free energy calculations for mutations of naturally occurring amino acids (except for proline) that allows an unprecedented, automated screening of large mutant libraries. To validate the developed protocol, we calculated thermodynamic stability differences for 109 mutations in the microbial Ribonuclease Barnase. The obtained quantitative agreement with experimental data illustrates the potential of the approach in protein engineering and design.
| S-EPMC2872215 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In calculations of relative free energy differences, the number of atoms of the initial and final states is rarely the same. This necessitates the introduction of dummy atoms. These placeholders interact with the physical system only by bonded energy terms. We investigate the conditions necessary so that the presence of dummy atoms does not influence the result of a relative free energy calculation. On the one hand, one has to ensure that dummy atoms only give a multiplicative contribution to the partition function so that their contribution cancels from double-free energy differences. On the other hand, the bonded terms used to attach a dummy atom (or group of dummy atoms) to the physical system have to maintain it in a well-defined position and orientation relative to the physical system. A detailed theoretical analysis of both aspects is provided, illustrated by 24 calculations of relative solvation free energy differences, for which all four legs of the underlying thermodynamic cycle were computed. Cycle closure (or lack thereof) was used as a sensitive indicator to probing the effects of dummy atom treatment on the resulting free energy differences. We find that a naive (but often practiced) treatment of dummy atoms results in errors of up to kBT when calculating the relative solvation free energy difference between two small solutes, such as methane and ammonia. While our analysis focuses on the so-called single topology approach to set up alchemical transformations, similar considerations apply to dual topology, at least many widely used variants thereof.
| S-EPMC8280730 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Computational techniques see widespread use in pharmaceutical drug discovery, but typically prove unreliable in predicting trends in protein-ligand binding. Alchemical free energy calculations seek to change that by providing rigorous binding free energies from molecular simulations. Given adequate sampling and an accurate enough force field, these techniques yield accurate free energy estimates. Recent innovations in alchemical techniques have sparked a resurgence of interest in these calculations. Still, many obstacles stand in the way of their routine application in a drug discovery context, including the one we focus on here, sampling. Sampling of binding modes poses a particular challenge as binding modes are often separated by large energy barriers, leading to slow transitions. Binding modes are difficult to predict, and in some cases multiple binding modes may contribute to binding. In view of these hurdles, we present a framework for dealing carefully with uncertainty in binding mode or conformation in the context of free energy calculations. With careful sampling, free energy techniques show considerable promise for aiding drug discovery.
| S-EPMC3537745 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Progress in the development of GPU-accelerated free energy simulation software has enabled practical applications on complex biological systems and fueled efforts to develop more accurate and robust predictive methods. In particular, this work re-examines concerted (a.k.a., one-step or unified) alchemical transformations commonly used in the prediction of hydration and relative binding free energies (RBFEs). We first classify several known challenges in these calculations into three categories: endpoint catastrophes, particle collapse, and large gradient-jumps. While endpoint catastrophes have long been addressed using softcore potentials, the remaining two problems occur much more sporadically and can result in either numerical instability (i.e., complete failure of a simulation) or inconsistent estimation (i.e., stochastic convergence to an incorrect result). The particle collapse problem stems from an imbalance in short-range electrostatic and repulsive interactions and can, in principle, be solved by appropriately balancing the respective softcore parameters. However, the large gradient-jump problem itself arises from the sensitivity of the free energy to large values of the softcore parameters, as might be used in trying to solve the particle collapse issue. Often, no satisfactory compromise exists with the existing softcore potential form. As a framework for solving these problems, we developed a new family of smoothstep softcore (SSC) potentials motivated by an analysis of the derivatives along the alchemical path. The smoothstep polynomials generalize the monomial functions that are used in most implementations and provide an additional path-dependent smoothing parameter. The effectiveness of this approach is demonstrated on simple yet pathological cases that illustrate the three problems outlined. With appropriate parameter selection, we find that a second-order SSC(2) potential does at least as well as the conventional approach and provides vast improvement in terms of consistency across all cases. Last, we compare the concerted SSC(2) approach against the gold-standard stepwise (a.k.a., decoupled or multistep) scheme over a large set of RBFE calculations as might be encountered in drug discovery.
| S-EPMC7494069 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In alchemical free energy (FE) simulations, annihilation and creation of atoms are generally achieved with the soft-core potential that shifts the interparticle separations. While this soft-core potential eliminates the numerical instability occurring near the two end states of the transformation, it makes the hybrid Hamiltonian vary nonlinearly with respect to the parameter λ, which interpolates between the Hamiltonians representing the two end states. This complicates FE estimation by Bennett acceptance ratio (BAR), free energy perturbation (FEP), and thermodynamic integration (TI) methods, thus reducing their calculation efficiency. In this work, we develop a new type of repulsive soft-core potential, called Gaussian soft-core (GSC) potential, with two parameters controlling its maximum and width. The main advantage of this potential is the linearity of the hybrid Hamiltonian with respect to λ, thus permitting the direct application of BAR, FEP, TI, and other variant FE methods. The accuracy and efficiency of the GSC potential are demonstrated by comparing the free energies of annihilation determined for 13 small molecules and an alchemical mutation of a protein side chain. In addition, in combination with a TI integrand (∂H/∂λ) estimation strategy, we show that GSC can considerably reduce the number of λ simulations compared to the commonly used separation-shifted soft-core potential.
| S-EPMC8324312 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We present an explicit solvent alchemical free-energy method for optimizing the partial charges of a ligand to maximize the binding affinity with a receptor. This methodology can be applied to known ligand-protein complexes to determine an optimized set of ligand partial atomic changes. Three protein-ligand complexes have been optimized in this work: FXa, P38, and the androgen receptor. The sets of optimized charges can be used to identify design principles for chemical changes to the ligands which improve the binding affinity for all three systems. In this work, beneficial chemical mutations are generated from these principles and the resulting molecules tested using free-energy perturbation calculations. We show that three quarters of our chemical changes are predicted to improve the binding affinity, with an average improvement for the beneficial mutations of approximately 1 kcal/mol. In the cases where experimental data are available, the agreement between prediction and experiment is also good. The results demonstrate that charge optimization in explicit solvent is a useful tool for predicting beneficial chemical changes such as pyridinations, fluorinations, and oxygen to sulfur mutations.
| S-EPMC7007198 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which mostly results from single nucleotide polymorphisms in antibiotic target genes, poses a major threat to tuberculosis treatment outcomes. Relative binding free energy (RBFE) calculations can rapidly predict the effects of mutations, but this approach has not been tested on large, complex proteins. We use RBFE calculations to predict the effects of M. tuberculosis RNA polymerase and DNA gyrase mutations on rifampicin and moxifloxacin susceptibility respectively. These mutations encompass a range of amino acid substitutions with known effects and include large steric perturbations and charged moieties. We find that moderate numbers (n = 3-15) of short RBFE calculations can predict resistance in cases where the mutation results in a large change in the binding free energy. We show that the method lacks discrimination in cases with either a small change in energy or that involve charged amino acids, and we investigate how these calculation errors may be decreased.
| S-EPMC9545121 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Recent advances in improved force fields and sampling methods have made it possible for the accurate calculation of protein–ligand binding free energies. Alchemical free energy perturbation (FEP) using an explicit solvent model is one of the most rigorous methods to calculate relative binding free energies. However, for cases where there are high energy barriers separating the relevant conformations that are important for ligand binding, the calculated free energy may depend on the initial conformation used in the simulation due to the lack of complete sampling of all the important regions in phase space. This is particularly true for ligands with multiple possible binding modes separated by high energy barriers, making it difficult to sample all relevant binding modes even with modern enhanced sampling methods. In this paper, we apply a previously developed method that provides a corrected binding free energy for ligands with multiple binding modes by combining the free energy results from multiple alchemical FEP calculations starting from all enumerated poses, and the results are compared with Glide docking and MM-GBSA calculations. From these calculations, the dominant ligand binding mode can also be predicted. We apply this method to a series of ligands that bind to c-Jun N-terminal kinase-1 (JNK1) and obtain improved free energy results. The dominant ligand binding modes predicted by this method agree with the available crystallography, while both Glide docking and MM-GBSA calculations incorrectly predict the binding modes for some ligands. The method also helps separate the force field error from the ligand sampling error, such that deviations in the predicted binding free energy from the experimental values likely indicate possible inaccuracies in the force field. An error in the force field for a subset of the ligands studied was identified using this method, and improved free energy results were obtained by correcting the partial charges assigned to the ligands. This improved the root-mean-square error (RMSE) for the predicted binding free energy from 1.9 kcal/mol with the original partial charges to 1.3 kcal/mol with the corrected partial charges.
| S-EPMC4462751 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Alchemical absolute binding free energy calculations are of increasing interest in drug discovery. These calculations require restraints between the receptor and ligand to restrict their relative positions and, optionally, orientations. Boresch restraints are commonly used, but they must be carefully selected in order to sufficiently restrain the ligand and to avoid inherent instabilities. Applying multiple distance restraints between anchor points in the receptor and ligand provides an alternative framework without inherent instabilities which may provide convergence benefits by more strongly restricting the relative movements of the receptor and ligand. However, there is no simple method to calculate the free energy of releasing these restraints due to the coupling of the internal and external degrees of freedom of the receptor and ligand. Here, a method to rigorously calculate free energies of binding with multiple distance restraints by imposing intramolecular restraints on the anchor points is proposed. Absolute binding free energies for the human macrophage migration inhibitory factor/MIF180, system obtained using a variety of Boresch restraints and rigorous and nonrigorous implementations of multiple distance restraints are compared. It is shown that several multiple distance restraint schemes produce estimates in good agreement with Boresch restraints. In contrast, calculations without orientational restraints produce erroneously favorable free energies of binding by up to approximately 4 kcal mol-1. These approaches offer new options for the deployment of alchemical absolute binding free energy calculations.
| S-EPMC10308817 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Integral membrane proteins are regulated by specific interactions with lipids from the surrounding bilayer. The structures of protein-lipid complexes can be determined through a combination of experimental and computational approaches, but the energetic basis of these interactions is difficult to resolve. Molecular dynamics simulations provide the primary computational technique to estimate the free energies of these interactions. We demonstrate that the energetics of protein-lipid interactions may be reliably and reproducibly calculated using three simulation-based approaches: potential of mean force calculations, alchemical free energy perturbation, and well-tempered metadynamics. We employ these techniques within the framework of a coarse-grained force field and apply them to both bacterial and mammalian membrane protein-lipid systems. We demonstrate good agreement between the different techniques, providing a robust framework for their automated implementation within a pipeline for annotation of newly determined membrane protein structures.
| S-EPMC6785801 | biostudies-literature