Dataset Information

Serological Response to BNT162b2 Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients with Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases: Results From the RHEUVAX Cohort.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

In the light of the current COVID-19 epidemic and the availability of effective vaccines, this study aims to identify factors associated with non-response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines as immunological alteration associated with immune rheumatic diseases (IRD) and immunosuppressive medications may impair the response to vaccination.

Methods

Volunteers in the health profession community with IRD, age, and sex-matched controls (CTRL) who underwent vaccination with two doses of BNT162b2 were recruited for this study. Anti-Trimeric Spike protein antibodies were assayed eight ± one weeks after the second vaccine dose. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors independently associated with non-response and low antibody titers.

Results

Samples were obtained from 237 IRD patients (m/f 73/164, mean age 57, CI 95% [56-59]): 4 autoinflammatory diseases (AI), 62 connective tissue diseases (CTD), 86 rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 71 spondylarthritis (SpA) and 14 vasculitis (Vsc). 232 CTRL were recruited (m/f 71/161, mean age 57, CI 95% [56-58]). Globally, IRD had a lower seroconversion rate (88.6% vs 99.6%, CI 95% OR [1.61-5.73], p<0.001) and lower antibody titer compared to controls (median (IQR) 403 (131.5-1012) versus 1160 (702.5-1675), p<0.001). After logistic regression, age, corticosteroid (CCS), Abatacept and Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) use were associated with non-response. Lower antibody titer was associated with the use of MMF, ABA, CCS, Rituximab, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor, JAK inhibitors, and higher age.

Conclusion

The response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is often impaired in IRD patients under treatment and may pose them at higher risk of severe COVID-19. Specific vaccination protocols are desirable for these patients.

SUBMITTER: Mauro D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9247185 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundRecent surveys in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD) showed a high degree of vaccine hesitancy. Current knowledge about patients' attitudes toward vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is limited.ObjectivesTo assess the willingness of CIRD patients to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 and to identify the influencing factors compared with non-CIRD patients.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, two cohorts of consecutive patients with and without CIRD were recruited in parallel when presenting to our tertiary hospital and asked to answer questions of a structured interview to assess vaccination willingness to SARS-CoV-2 their experience with SARS-CoV-2 and their personal history of infections and vaccinations. Vaccination willingness was assessed using a numerical rating scale (0: fully disagree; 10: fully agree). Arbitrarily defined cut-offs were used to define definite (score ⩾7) and probable willingness (score of 5 or 6) to be vaccinated. Factors associated with willingness were assessed using Kendall's tau-b correlation measure and linear regression analysis.ResultsA total of 514 CIRD and 100 non-CIRD patients, mean age of 54.7 ± 12.8 and 55.6 ± 9.8 years, respectively, were included. Definite and probable willingness to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 was declared by 79.6% and 90.7% versus 76.0% and 85.0% of CIRD and non-CIRD patients, respectively. Only 60% of CIRD patients believed that the vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 were safe, and 42% indicated to be afraid of side effects. Vaccination willingness was significantly correlated with being in a risk group for COVID-19 (tau-b = -0.149), hypertension (tau-b = 0.14), and information about disease prevention (tau-b = 0.19), while a history of infections or immunosuppressive therapy was not. Vaccination willingness was significantly associated with higher education (b = 0.65) and age (b = 0.06).ConclusionThis survey highlights several predictors of relevance for the vaccination willingness of patients with CIRD and controls including appropriate information about its relevance. The good news, however, is that the vast majority of CIRD patients indicated their willingness to be vaccinated. However, there was some uncertainty regarding the safety and efficacy of the vaccines. Since the major influencing factors were education and information about SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine and COVID-19 Disease, patient education should be improved soon.

Project description:BackgroundInflammatory bowel disease (IBD) including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are associated with higher thrombotic risk and enhanced thrombin generation (TG) in adults. Despite encouraging data reporting vaccine safety and low IBD flare rates in adults with IBD, vaccine hesitancy was demonstrated to be high in families of children with IBD. We aimed to find out whether TG is increased in children with IBD as compared to healthy controls and whether TG parameters show significant changes following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination.Patients and methodsIn this observational case-control study, 38 children with IBD (CD:18, UC: 20) aged 12-18 years and 62 healthy age-and sex-matched children were enrolled. Blood was collected before the first dose and 2-6 weeks after the second dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) mRNA vaccine dose. Blood cell counts, fibrinogen, inflammatory markers (hsCRP, ferritin), anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels were investigated, TG assay was carried-out using platelet-poor plasma. Detailed clinical parameters including disease activity scores (PUCAI, PCDAI) were registered pre-and post- vaccination. A guided questionnaire was used to collect data on adverse reactions (AEs) post- vaccination.ResultsBaseline TG parameters did not differ between patients and controls. Endogenous thrombin potential showed a significant positive correlation with markers of inflammation and with PCDAI. Inflammatory parameters and TG did not increase in patients and controls post-vaccination. Vaccination significantly increased antibody levels in all three investigated groups, but post-vaccination anti-SARS-CoV-2 S IgG/IgM levels were below the 5th percentile value of healthy children in more than one third of patients. Those receiving TNFα inhibitor therapy presented significantly lower SARS-CoV-2 S IgG/IgM levels as compared to patients on other immunosuppressive regimens. Systemic AEs did not differ between patients and controls while lower rate of local symptoms was found post-vaccination in children with IBD. Only 2 IBD flares were detected 2-6 weeks after the second dose of vaccination.ConclusionOur study is the first to support the safety and efficacy of anti-SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccination in children with IBD with detailed pre-and post-vaccination laboratory data including TG. Results of this study may further increase confidence and reduce vaccine hesitancy in caretakers of pediatric IBD patients.